• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读障碍在神经纤维瘤病 1 型(NF1)儿童中的表现:需要对注意力进行多模态评估。

Reading Comprehension Impairment in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): The Need of Multimodal Assessment of Attention.

机构信息

ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, 27102Inserm, UPS, France.

Children's Hospital, Toulouse-Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

出版信息

J Child Neurol. 2021 Jul;36(8):625-634. doi: 10.1177/0883073820981270. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1177/0883073820981270
PMID:33507832
Abstract

Attention span, which has been shown to have an impact on reading quality in many other conditions, is one of the main cognitive disorders of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The aim of this work is to observe the impact of attention on reading comprehension, in NF1 and non-NF1 children. A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 children (8-12 years old) with or without NF1 (75 NF1 vs 75 non-NF1; 72 female, 78 male), matched for age, sex, handedness, and reading level, thus forming a continuum from good to poor readers in both NF1 and non-NF1 groups. Children with intellectual deficiency or neurologic or psychiatric disorder were excluded. Attentional skills were assessed by combining a parent questionnaire (Child Behavior CheckList) and a performance-based assessment (Conner's Continuous Performance Test-Second Edition). Reading comprehension was assessed through a standardized reading comprehension test (ORLEC Lobrot). The performance-based attention scores were associated with text and sentence comprehension ability ( = .0235 and = .0164, respectively), while indirect questionnaire attention scores were only associated with sentence comprehension ( = .0263). For both groups, the correlations between questionnaire and performance-based measures were low. We have shown that reading comprehension is greatly influenced by attention in NF1 and non-NF1, even if predictors of good reading comprehension also include IQ score and reading accuracy. Indirect observer-rated questionnaires and direct performance-based measures of attention do not assess the same variables, are linked to different components of reading skills, and are not interchangeable assessments of attention difficulties. Both assessments are complementary and must be used simultaneously, leading to recommendations that support multimodal assessment of attention.

摘要

注意广度,它在许多其他情况下都被证明对阅读质量有影响,是神经纤维瘤病 1 型(NF1)的主要认知障碍之一。本研究旨在观察注意力对 NF1 和非 NF1 儿童阅读理解的影响。我们进行了一项多中心、横断面研究,纳入了 150 名儿童(8-12 岁),包括 NF1 患儿(75 名 NF1 患儿和 75 名非 NF1 患儿)和非 NF1 患儿(72 名女性,78 名男性),两组儿童在年龄、性别、利手和阅读水平上均匹配,因此在 NF1 和非 NF1 组中形成了从阅读良好到阅读较差的连续体。排除了智力障碍或神经或精神障碍的儿童。通过结合父母问卷(儿童行为检查表)和基于表现的评估(康纳连续表现测验第二版)来评估注意力技能。通过标准化阅读理解测试(ORLEC Lobrot)评估阅读理解能力。基于表现的注意力评分与文本和句子理解能力相关(分别为 =.0235 和 =.0164),而间接问卷注意力评分仅与句子理解相关( =.0263)。对于两组儿童,问卷和基于表现的测量之间的相关性较低。我们已经表明,即使阅读理解的良好预测因素还包括智商得分和阅读准确性,注意力也会极大地影响 NF1 和非 NF1 儿童的阅读理解。间接观察者评定问卷和直接基于表现的注意力测量不能评估相同的变量,与阅读技能的不同成分相关,并且不能相互替代注意力困难的评估。两种评估方法是互补的,必须同时使用,这导致了支持多模式注意力评估的建议。

相似文献

1
Reading Comprehension Impairment in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1): The Need of Multimodal Assessment of Attention.阅读障碍在神经纤维瘤病 1 型(NF1)儿童中的表现:需要对注意力进行多模态评估。
J Child Neurol. 2021 Jul;36(8):625-634. doi: 10.1177/0883073820981270. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
The nature and frequency of cognitive deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1.1型神经纤维瘤病患儿认知缺陷的性质和频率。
Neurology. 2005 Oct 11;65(7):1037-44. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000179303.72345.ce.
3
Neuropsychological profile in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 compared to a control group.神经纤维瘤病 1 型成人的神经心理学特征与对照组比较。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Sep;57(9):874-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01648.x. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
4
Deficit in phonological processes: a characteristic of the neuropsychological profile of children with NF1.语音加工缺陷:NF1 患儿神经心理学特征之一。
Child Neuropsychol. 2018 May;24(4):558-574. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2017.1313970. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
5
Motor dysfunction in NF1: Mediated by attention deficit or inherent to the disorder?NF1 中的运动功能障碍:是由注意力缺陷引起的还是固有障碍?
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018 Jan;22(1):164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
Cognitive features that distinguish preschool-age children with neurofibromatosis type 1 from their peers: a matched case-control study.认知特征将患有神经纤维瘤病 1 型的学龄前儿童与其同龄人区分开来:一项匹配的病例对照研究。
J Pediatr. 2013 Nov;163(5):1479-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.038. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
7
Visual-processing deficits in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: A clinical marker of reading difficulties.患有 1 型神经纤维瘤病儿童的视觉处理缺陷:阅读困难的临床标志物。
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2022 May;38:25-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
8
Profiling the Word Reading Abilities of School-Age Children with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.剖析1型神经纤维瘤病学龄儿童的单词阅读能力
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2021 May;27(5):484-496. doi: 10.1017/S135561772000106X. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
9
Understanding autism spectrum disorder and social functioning in children with neurofibromatosis type 1: protocol for a cross-sectional multimodal study.了解神经纤维瘤病 1 型患儿的自闭症谱系障碍和社会功能:一项横断面多模态研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 26;9(9):e030601. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030601.
10
Treatment of ADHD in neurofibromatosis type 1.1型神经纤维瘤病中注意力缺陷多动障碍的治疗
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002 Mar;44(3):164-70. doi: 10.1017/s0012162201001876.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of intellectual, neuropsychological, and psychoeducational functioning in neurofibromatosis type 1.1 型神经纤维瘤病的智力、神经心理学和心理教育功能的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Med Genet A. 2022 Aug;188(8):2277-2292. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62773. Epub 2022 May 12.
2
Attention and Motor Learning in Adult Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 1.注意力和运动学习在成年 1 型神经纤维瘤病患者中的作用。
J Atten Disord. 2022 Feb;26(4):563-572. doi: 10.1177/10870547211012035. Epub 2021 May 12.