ToNIC, Toulouse NeuroImaging Center, University of Toulouse, 27102Inserm, UPS, France.
Children's Hospital, Toulouse-Purpan University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
J Child Neurol. 2021 Jul;36(8):625-634. doi: 10.1177/0883073820981270. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Attention span, which has been shown to have an impact on reading quality in many other conditions, is one of the main cognitive disorders of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The aim of this work is to observe the impact of attention on reading comprehension, in NF1 and non-NF1 children. A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 children (8-12 years old) with or without NF1 (75 NF1 vs 75 non-NF1; 72 female, 78 male), matched for age, sex, handedness, and reading level, thus forming a continuum from good to poor readers in both NF1 and non-NF1 groups. Children with intellectual deficiency or neurologic or psychiatric disorder were excluded. Attentional skills were assessed by combining a parent questionnaire (Child Behavior CheckList) and a performance-based assessment (Conner's Continuous Performance Test-Second Edition). Reading comprehension was assessed through a standardized reading comprehension test (ORLEC Lobrot). The performance-based attention scores were associated with text and sentence comprehension ability ( = .0235 and = .0164, respectively), while indirect questionnaire attention scores were only associated with sentence comprehension ( = .0263). For both groups, the correlations between questionnaire and performance-based measures were low. We have shown that reading comprehension is greatly influenced by attention in NF1 and non-NF1, even if predictors of good reading comprehension also include IQ score and reading accuracy. Indirect observer-rated questionnaires and direct performance-based measures of attention do not assess the same variables, are linked to different components of reading skills, and are not interchangeable assessments of attention difficulties. Both assessments are complementary and must be used simultaneously, leading to recommendations that support multimodal assessment of attention.
注意广度,它在许多其他情况下都被证明对阅读质量有影响,是神经纤维瘤病 1 型(NF1)的主要认知障碍之一。本研究旨在观察注意力对 NF1 和非 NF1 儿童阅读理解的影响。我们进行了一项多中心、横断面研究,纳入了 150 名儿童(8-12 岁),包括 NF1 患儿(75 名 NF1 患儿和 75 名非 NF1 患儿)和非 NF1 患儿(72 名女性,78 名男性),两组儿童在年龄、性别、利手和阅读水平上均匹配,因此在 NF1 和非 NF1 组中形成了从阅读良好到阅读较差的连续体。排除了智力障碍或神经或精神障碍的儿童。通过结合父母问卷(儿童行为检查表)和基于表现的评估(康纳连续表现测验第二版)来评估注意力技能。通过标准化阅读理解测试(ORLEC Lobrot)评估阅读理解能力。基于表现的注意力评分与文本和句子理解能力相关(分别为 =.0235 和 =.0164),而间接问卷注意力评分仅与句子理解相关( =.0263)。对于两组儿童,问卷和基于表现的测量之间的相关性较低。我们已经表明,即使阅读理解的良好预测因素还包括智商得分和阅读准确性,注意力也会极大地影响 NF1 和非 NF1 儿童的阅读理解。间接观察者评定问卷和直接基于表现的注意力测量不能评估相同的变量,与阅读技能的不同成分相关,并且不能相互替代注意力困难的评估。两种评估方法是互补的,必须同时使用,这导致了支持多模式注意力评估的建议。