Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Centre for Sport, Exercise, and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Apr 1;130(4):1033-1042. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00888.2020. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
Hemodialysis is associated with numerous symptoms and side effects that, in part, may be due to subclinical hypoxia. However, acute cardiopulmonary and metabolic physiology during hemodialysis is not well defined. Intradialytic and interdialytic exercise appear to be beneficial and may alleviate these side effects. To better understand these potential benefits, the acute physiological response to exercise should be evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare and characterize the acute physiological response during hemodialysis, intradialytic exercise, and interdialytic exercise. Cardiopulmonary physiology was evaluated during three conditions: ) hemodialysis without exercise (HD), ) intradialytic exercise (IDEx), and ) interdialytic exercise (Ex). Exercise consisted of 30-min constant load cycle ergometry at 90% V̇OAT (anaerobic threshold). Central hemodynamics (via noninvasive bioreactance) and ventilatory gas exchange were recorded during each experimental condition. Twenty participants (59 ± 12 yr, 16/20 male) completed the protocol. Cardiac output (Δ = -0.7 L/min), O uptake (Δ = -1.4 mL/kg/min), and arterial-venous O difference (Δ = -2.0 mL/O/100 mL) decreased significantly during HD. Respiratory exchange ratio exceeded 1.0 throughout HD and IDEx. Minute ventilation was lower ( = 0.001) during IDEx (16.5 ± 1.1 L/min) compared with Ex (19.8 ± 1.0 L/min). Arterial-venous O difference was partially restored further to IDEx (4.6 ± 1.9 mL/O/100 mL) compared with HD (3.5 ± 1.2 mL/O/100 mL). Hemodialysis altered cardiopulmonary and metabolic physiology, suggestive of hypoxia. This dysregulated physiology contributed to a greater physiological demand during intradialytic exercise compared with interdialytic exercise. Despite this, intradialytic exercise partly normalized cardiopulmonary physiology during treatment, which may translate to a reduction in the symptoms and side effects of hemodialysis. This study is the first, to our knowledge, to directly compare cardiopulmonary and metabolic physiology during hemodialysis, intradialytic exercise, and interdialytic exercise. Hemodialysis was associated with increased respiratory exchange ratio, blunted minute ventilation, and impaired O uptake and extraction. We also identified a reduced ventilatory response during intradialytic exercise compared with interdialytic exercise. Impaired arterial-venous O difference during hemodialysis was partly restored by intradialytic exercise. Despite dysregulated cardiopulmonary and metabolic physiology during hemodialysis, intradialytic exercise was well tolerated.
血液透析会引起多种症状和副作用,部分原因可能是亚临床缺氧。然而,血液透析期间的急性心肺和代谢生理学尚不清楚。血液透析期间和透析间期的运动似乎是有益的,可能减轻这些副作用。为了更好地理解这些潜在益处,应该评估运动的急性生理反应。本研究旨在比较和描述血液透析、血液透析期间运动和透析间期运动期间的急性生理反应。在三种情况下评估心肺生理学:)无运动的血液透析(HD),)血液透析期间运动(IDEx),和)透析间期运动(Ex)。运动包括 30 分钟以 90% V̇OAT(无氧阈)为恒定负荷的脚踏车测功计运动。在每个实验条件下记录中心血液动力学(通过非侵入性生物电抗)和呼吸气体交换。20 名参与者(59±12 岁,16/20 名男性)完成了方案。HD 期间心输出量(Δ=-0.7L/min)、O 摄取(Δ=-1.4mL/kg/min)和动静脉 O 差(Δ=-2.0mL/O/100mL)明显降低。整个 HD 和 IDEx 期间呼吸交换比超过 1.0。分钟通气量在 IDEx(16.5±1.1L/min)比 Ex(19.8±1.0L/min)更低(=0.001)。与 HD(3.5±1.2mL/O/100mL)相比,IDEx 进一步部分恢复了动静脉 O 差(4.6±1.9mL/O/100mL)。血液透析改变了心肺和代谢生理学,提示存在缺氧。这种失调的生理学导致血液透析期间运动的生理需求增加,与透析间期运动相比。尽管如此,血液透析期间的运动部分使心肺生理学正常化,这可能减少血液透析的症状和副作用。本研究是第一个直接比较血液透析、血液透析期间运动和透析间期运动期间心肺和代谢生理学的研究。血液透析与呼吸交换比增加、分钟通气量降低以及 O 摄取和提取受损有关。我们还发现,与透析间期运动相比,血液透析期间的通气反应降低。血液透析期间的动静脉 O 差通过血液透析期间的运动得到部分恢复。尽管血液透析期间心肺和代谢生理学失调,但血液透析期间运动耐受良好。