Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Department of Nephrology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2020 Sep 1;319(3):F515-F522. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00258.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Maximal O uptake is impaired in end-stage renal disease (ESRD), reducing quality of life and longevity. While determinants of maximal exercise intolerance are well defined, little is known of limitation during submaximal constant load exercise. By comparing individuals with ESRD and healthy controls, the aim of this exploratory study was to characterize mechanisms of exercise intolerance in participants with ESRD by assessing cardiopulmonary physiology at rest and during exercise. Resting spirometry and echocardiography were performed in 20 dialysis-dependent participants with ESRD (age: 59 ± 12 yr, 14 men and 6 women) and 20 healthy age- and sex-matched controls. Exercise tolerance was assessed with ventilatory gas exchange and central hemodynamics during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and 30 min of submaximal constant load exercise. Left ventricular mass (292 ± 102 vs. 185 ± 83 g, = 0.01) and filling pressure (/: 6.48 ± 3.57 vs. 12.09 ± 6.50 m/s, = 0.02) were higher in participants with ESRD; forced vital capacity (3.44 ± 1 vs. 4.29 ± 0.95 L/min, = 0.03) and peak O uptake (13.3 ± 2.7 vs. 24.6 ± 7.3 mL·kg·min, < 0.001) were lower. During constant load exercise, the relative increase in the arterial-venous O difference (13 ± 18% vs. 74 ± 18%) and heart rate (32 ± 18 vs. 75 ± 29%) were less in participants with ESRD despite exercise being performed at a higher percentage of maximum minute ventilation (48 ± 3% vs. 39 ± 3%) and heart rate (82 ± 2 vs. 64 ± 2%). Ventilatory and chronotropic incompetence contribute to exercise intolerance in individuals with ESRD. Both are potential targets for medical and lifestyle interventions.
最大摄氧量在终末期肾病 (ESRD) 中受损,降低了生活质量和寿命。虽然最大运动不耐受的决定因素已经得到很好的定义,但对于亚最大恒负荷运动期间的限制知之甚少。通过将 ESRD 患者与健康对照进行比较,这项探索性研究的目的是通过评估静息和运动时的心肺生理学来描述 ESRD 患者运动不耐受的机制。对 20 名依赖透析的 ESRD 患者(年龄:59±12 岁,14 名男性和 6 名女性)和 20 名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照进行了静息肺活量测定和超声心动图检查。在最大心肺运动试验期间以及 30 分钟的亚最大恒负荷运动期间,通过通气气体交换和中心血液动力学评估运动耐量。ESRD 患者的左心室质量(292±102 比 185±83 g, = 0.01)和充盈压(/: 6.48±3.57 比 12.09±6.50 m/s, = 0.02)更高;用力肺活量(3.44±1 比 4.29±0.95 L/min, = 0.03)和峰值 O 摄取量(13.3±2.7 比 24.6±7.3 mL·kg·min, < 0.001)更低。在恒负荷运动期间,尽管运动在最大分钟通气量的更高百分比(48±3%比 39±3%)和心率(82±2 比 64±2%)下进行,但 ESRD 患者的动脉-静脉 O 差(13±18%比 74±18%)和心率(32±18%比 75±29%)的相对增加幅度较小。通气和变时性不全导致 ESRD 患者运动不耐受。两者都是医学和生活方式干预的潜在靶点。