Suppr超能文献

既往剖宫产原因影响产妇分娩方式的独立决策和再次剖宫产试产的成功率。

Reasons for previous Cesarean deliveries impact a woman's independent decision of delivery mode and the success of trial of labor after Cesarean.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Perinatal Medical Center, TOYOTA Memorial Hospital, 1-1, Heiwa-cho, Toyota, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 24;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2833-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cesarean delivery rates are increasing globally with almost half of them occurring due to a previous Cesarean delivery. A trial of labor after Cesarean (TOLAC) is considered a safe procedure, but most eligible women instead undergo Cesarean before 39 weeks of gestation. Lack of education about TOLAC is often associated with increased repeat Cesarean. To reveal the safety and feasibility of TOLAC, we conducted this observational, prospective study with women's independent decisions. We aimed to clarify the relationship between their chosen mode of delivery and the reason for their previous Cesarean. Additionally, we have tried to identify maternal and obstetric factors associated with failed TOLAC to improve its success rate.

METHODS

This was a prospective, observational study of 1086 pregnant women with at least one previous Cesarean delivery. Of these, 735 women met our TOLAC criteria (Table 1), and then, could choose TOLAC or repeat Cesarean after receiving detailed explanations regarding the risks and benefits of both procedures. The primary outcomes were the number of successful TOLAC procedures and 5-min Apgar scores < 7 for the trial of labor after Cesarean group and elective Cesarean group. We collected the maternal and neonatal data including the reasons of previous Cesarean.

RESULTS

In total, 64.1% of women chose TOLAC. The success rate was 91.3%. The uterine rupture rate was 0.6%. There were no significant differences in the rate of Apgar scores at 5 min < 7 between both groups. Histories of experience of labor in previous Cesarean delivery were observed in 30 and 50% of women who chose TOLAC and repeat Cesarean, respectively (p < 0.05). Factors related to failed TOLAC included ≥40 weeks of gestation (odds: 5.47, 95% CI: 2.55-11.70) and prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM) (odds: 4.47, 95% CI: 2.07-9.63).

CONCLUSIONS

TOLAC is a favorable delivery option for both mothers and neonates when women meet criteria and choose after receiving detailed explanations. Women who experience PROM or ≥ 40 weeks of gestation, their modes of delivery should be reconsulted.

摘要

背景

全球剖宫产率不断上升,其中近一半是由于前次剖宫产。剖宫产后试产(TOLAC)被认为是一种安全的手术,但大多数符合条件的女性仍在 39 孕周前行剖宫产。缺乏关于 TOLAC 的教育通常与重复剖宫产增加有关。为了揭示 TOLAC 的安全性和可行性,我们进行了这项观察性、前瞻性研究,让女性自主决策。我们旨在阐明她们选择的分娩方式与前次剖宫产的原因之间的关系。此外,我们还试图确定与 TOLAC 失败相关的产妇和产科因素,以提高其成功率。

方法

这是一项对 1086 名至少有一次前次剖宫产的孕妇进行的前瞻性、观察性研究。其中,735 名妇女符合我们的 TOLAC 标准(表 1),然后在详细解释两种手术的风险和益处后,可以选择 TOLAC 或重复剖宫产。主要结局是 TOLAC 成功的例数和剖宫产后 5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 的例数。我们收集了产妇和新生儿数据,包括前次剖宫产的原因。

结果

共有 64.1%的妇女选择 TOLAC。成功率为 91.3%。子宫破裂率为 0.6%。两组间 5 分钟 Apgar 评分<7 的发生率无显著差异。在选择 TOLAC 和重复剖宫产的妇女中,分别有 30%和 50%的人在前次剖宫产时有过分娩经历(p<0.05)。与 TOLAC 失败相关的因素包括≥40 孕周(比值比:5.47,95%可信区间:2.55-11.70)和胎膜早破(PROM)(比值比:4.47,95%可信区间:2.07-9.63)。

结论

当妇女符合标准并在接受详细解释后选择时,TOLAC 对母亲和新生儿都是一种有利的分娩选择。经历 PROM 或≥40 孕周的妇女,应重新考虑其分娩方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d48b/7092517/ce550a263d8e/12884_2020_2833_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验