• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语法类别与短语的神经处理

Grammatical category and the neural processing of phrases.

作者信息

Burroughs Amelia, Kazanina Nina, Houghton Conor

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81901-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-81901-5
PMID:33510230
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7844293/
Abstract

The interlocking roles of lexical, syntactic and semantic processing in language comprehension has been the subject of longstanding debate. Recently, the cortical response to a frequency-tagged linguistic stimulus has been shown to track the rate of phrase and sentence, as well as syllable, presentation. This could be interpreted as evidence for the hierarchical processing of speech, or as a response to the repetition of grammatical category. To examine the extent to which hierarchical structure plays a role in language processing we recorded EEG from human participants as they listen to isochronous streams of monosyllabic words. Comparing responses to sequences in which grammatical category is strictly alternating and chosen such that two-word phrases can be grammatically constructed-cold food loud room-or is absent-rough give ill tell-showed cortical entrainment at the two-word phrase rate was only present in the grammatical condition. Thus, grammatical category repetition alone does not yield entertainment at higher level than a word. On the other hand, cortical entrainment was reduced for the mixed-phrase condition that contained two-word phrases but no grammatical category repetition-that word send less-which is not what would be expected if the measured entrainment reflected purely abstract hierarchical syntactic units. Our results support a model in which word-level grammatical category information is required to build larger units.

摘要

词汇、句法和语义处理在语言理解中的相互关联作用一直是长期争论的主题。最近,研究表明,大脑皮层对频率标记的语言刺激的反应能够追踪短语、句子以及音节的呈现速率。这既可以被解释为语音分层处理的证据,也可以被看作是对语法类别重复的一种反应。为了探究分层结构在语言处理中所起作用的程度,我们在人类参与者聆听单音节词的等时流时记录了他们的脑电图(EEG)。将对语法类别严格交替且能构建双词短语(如“cold food”“loud room”)的序列的反应,与不存在语法类别(如“rough give”“ill tell”)的序列的反应进行比较,结果显示,仅在语法条件下才会出现以双词短语速率的皮层夹带现象。因此,仅语法类别重复并不会在高于单词的层面产生同步现象。另一方面,对于包含双词短语但无语法类别重复(如“that word send less”)的混合短语条件,皮层夹带现象减少了,而如果所测量的夹带现象纯粹反映抽象的分层句法单位,那么情况并非如此。我们的研究结果支持了这样一种模型,即构建更大的语言单位需要词级语法类别信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/d23301516873/41598_2021_81901_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/464941ac7398/41598_2021_81901_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/07ac3c8424c1/41598_2021_81901_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/7434b14e1a4d/41598_2021_81901_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/d23301516873/41598_2021_81901_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/464941ac7398/41598_2021_81901_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/07ac3c8424c1/41598_2021_81901_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/7434b14e1a4d/41598_2021_81901_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f7/7844293/d23301516873/41598_2021_81901_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Grammatical category and the neural processing of phrases.语法类别与短语的神经处理
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81901-5.
2
Structural and sequential regularities modulate phrase-rate neural tracking.结构和顺序的规律性调节短语速率的神经追踪。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67153-z.
3
The Influence of Auditory Attention on Rhythmic Speech Tracking: Implications for Studies of Unresponsive Patients.听觉注意力对节奏性言语追踪的影响:对无反应患者研究的启示
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Aug 11;15:702768. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.702768. eCollection 2021.
4
Delta, theta, beta, and gamma brain oscillations index levels of auditory sentence processing.δ波、θ波、β波和γ波脑振荡反映听觉句子处理的水平。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jun;133:516-528. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
5
Relationship of Grammatical Context on Children's Recognition of s/z-Inflected Words.语法语境与儿童对s/z词尾变化单词的识别之间的关系。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2017 Oct;28(9):799-809. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.16151.
6
Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.语言结构和意义将神经振荡组织成内容特定的层级。
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9467-9475. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0302-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
7
Rule-based and Word-level Statistics-based Processing of Language: Insights from Neuroscience.基于规则和基于词级统计的语言处理:来自神经科学的见解。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2017;32(5):570-575. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1215477. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
8
The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: new evidence on the role of syntax and semantics.正常发育儿童与语法特定性语言障碍儿童的数量-质量区分:关于句法和语义作用的新证据
J Commun Disord. 2008 May-Jun;41(3):274-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
9
Word category conversion causes processing costs: evidence from adjectival passives.词类转换导致加工成本:形容词被动语态的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):651-6. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.651.
10
Low-frequency neural activity reflects rule-based chunking during speech listening.低频神经活动反映了言语听知觉中基于规则的组块化。
Elife. 2020 Apr 20;9:e55613. doi: 10.7554/eLife.55613.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-frequency cortical activity reflects context-dependent parsing of word sequences.低频皮层活动反映了对词序列的上下文相关解析。
iScience. 2025 May 13;28(6):112650. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112650. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
2
Decoding the Neural Dynamics of Headed Syntactic Structure Building.解读有标记句法结构构建的神经动力学
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 23;45(17):e2126242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2126-24.2025.
3
Segmentation window of speech information processing in the human auditory cortex.人类听觉皮层中语音信息处理的分段窗口。

本文引用的文献

1
Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks.现代人工神经网络中的语言泛化和组合性。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190307. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0307. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
2
Lexical representation explains cortical entrainment during speech comprehension.词汇表征解释了言语理解过程中的皮质同步。
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197304. eCollection 2018.
3
The neural oscillations of speech processing and language comprehension: state of the art and emerging mechanisms.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 24;14(1):25044. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76137-y.
4
Structural and sequential regularities modulate phrase-rate neural tracking.结构和顺序的规律性调节短语速率的神经追踪。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16603. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67153-z.
5
Bayesian analysis of phase data in EEG and MEG.脑电和脑磁相位数据的贝叶斯分析。
Elife. 2023 Sep 12;12:e84602. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84602.
6
Effects of Structure and Meaning on Cortical Tracking of Linguistic Units in Naturalistic Speech.结构和意义对自然语言中语言单位的皮层追踪的影响。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Jun 21;3(3):386-412. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00070. eCollection 2022.
7
Hierarchy, Not Lexical Regularity, Modulates Low-Frequency Neural Synchrony During Language Comprehension.在语言理解过程中,层级结构而非词汇规律性调节低频神经同步。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 22;3(4):538-555. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00077. eCollection 2022.
8
ROSE: A Neurocomputational Architecture for Syntax.ROSE:一种用于句法的神经计算架构。
ArXiv. 2023 Mar 15:arXiv:2303.08877v1.
9
What neural oscillations can and cannot do for syntactic structure building.神经振荡在句法结构构建方面的作用及局限性
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023 Feb;24(2):113-128. doi: 10.1038/s41583-022-00659-5. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
10
Neural classification maps for distinct word combinations in Broca's area.布洛卡区中不同单词组合的神经分类图谱。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:930849. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.930849. eCollection 2022.
言语加工和语言理解的神经振荡:最新进展和新兴机制。
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(7):2609-2621. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13748. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
4
Characterizing Neural Entrainment to Hierarchical Linguistic Units using Electroencephalography (EEG).利用脑电图(EEG)表征对分层语言单元的神经同步。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 28;11:481. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00481. eCollection 2017.
5
Cortical tracking of hierarchical linguistic structures in connected speech.连贯言语中层次语言结构的皮层追踪。
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):158-64. doi: 10.1038/nn.4186. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
6
Structures, Not Strings: Linguistics as Part of the Cognitive Sciences.结构,而非字符串:语言学作为认知科学的一部分。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):729-743. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.008. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
7
The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.现在或永不决口:语言的基本约束
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e62. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X1500031X. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
8
Evolution, brain, and the nature of language.进化、大脑与语言的本质。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):89-98. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.12.002. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
9
How hierarchical is language use?语言使用的层级结构是怎样的?
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 22;279(1747):4522-31. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1741. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
Insensitivity of the human sentence-processing system to hierarchical structure.人类句子处理系统对层次结构不敏感。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):829-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797611409589. Epub 2011 May 17.