Department of Radiotherapy, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:1533033821990017. doi: 10.1177/1533033821990017.
Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone are both standard treatment regimens for managing locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, the results of comparisons between them in clinical trials vary. Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to illustrate their advantages and disadvantages in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
We thoroughly searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases and then merged the effect indicators of hazard ratios and risk ratios using RevMan 5.1.
Seven randomized controlled trials totaling 2,319 patients were included in our research. The synthesized results showed that induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved overall survival (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.63-0.89, = 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.80, < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.80, < 0.001) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.68 95%, CI: 0.54-0.86, = 0.001) versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. It also increased the risk of anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. However, the incidence of leukopenia and mucositis was similar in induction chemotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed better survival outcomes with induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy than with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in the triweekly cisplatin subgroup (all < 0.01), whereas induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy could only improve progression-free survival and locoregional recurrence-free survival in the weekly cisplatin subgroup (HR = 0.78, = 0.02; and HR = 0.66, = 0.03, respectively).
Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy improved survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy. For the weekly cisplatin regimen subgroup, it did not improve remote control or overall survival versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone, warranting further clarification.
诱导化疗联合同期放化疗和单纯同期放化疗均为局部晚期鼻咽癌的标准治疗方案。然而,临床试验中两者比较的结果存在差异。因此,我们设计了这项荟萃分析,以说明它们在局部晚期鼻咽癌患者中的优缺点。
我们全面检索了 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane Library 数据库,并使用 RevMan 5.1 合并了危险比和风险比的效应指标。
纳入了 7 项随机对照试验,共计 2319 例患者。综合结果显示,诱导化疗联合同期放化疗可提高总生存(HR=0.75,95%CI:0.63-0.89, = 0.001)、无进展生存(HR=0.69,95%CI:0.60-0.80, < 0.001)、无远处转移生存(HR=0.65,95%CI:0.53-0.80, < 0.001)和局部区域无复发生存(HR=0.68,95%CI:0.54-0.86, = 0.001),但同期放化疗中增加了贫血、血小板减少和中性粒细胞减少的风险。然而,诱导化疗和诱导化疗联合同期放化疗的白细胞减少和黏膜炎发生率相似。此外,亚组分析显示,与单纯同期放化疗相比,三星期一次顺铂组(均<0.01)诱导化疗联合同期放化疗的生存结局更好,而每周一次顺铂组仅能改善无进展生存和局部区域无复发生存(HR=0.78, = 0.02;和 HR=0.66, = 0.03)。
与单纯同期放化疗相比,诱导化疗联合同期放化疗可改善局部晚期鼻咽癌患者的生存结局。对于每周一次顺铂方案亚组,与单纯同期放化疗相比,它并未改善远处控制或总体生存,这需要进一步澄清。