J Adhes Dent. 2021;23(1):7-19. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b916811.
To systematically review in vitro studies that evaluated adhesive-dentin bond strength with or without the addition of desensitizers.
A search was conducted in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) without publication date or language limits in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Two reviewers selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias independently. The inclusion criterion was the evaluation of the effect of immediate or aged bond strength after applying desensitizer in the bonding step. The risk of bias was assessed following the method used by Sarkis-Onofre et al.41 Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3.
A total of 1636 articles were found using the search strategy above; 59 articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 32 were systematically reviewed, with 18 considered in the meta-analysis. Results showed a significant difference among various kinds of desensitizers. The subgroup comparison showed high heterogeneity among the different kinds of desensitizers. The use of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP) and arginine-CaCO3 showed no negative effect on the immediate bond strength, whereas other desensitizers showed some influence.
Different desensitizers have various effects on microtensile bond strength. Desensitizers may be selected based on the bond strength and especially used to relieve tooth sensitivity after tooth preparation.
系统评价评估有无使用脱敏剂时牙本质粘结强度的体外研究。
根据系统评价的首选报告项目(PRISMA),我们在四个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library)中进行了无出版日期或语言限制的搜索。两名评审员独立选择研究、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。纳入标准是评估在粘结步骤中使用脱敏剂后即刻或老化粘结强度的效果。偏倚风险评估采用 Sarkis-Onofre 等人的方法。使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行荟萃分析。
使用上述搜索策略共发现 1636 篇文章;对 59 篇文章进行全文分析,系统评价 32 篇,荟萃分析 18 篇。结果表明,各种脱敏剂之间存在显著差异。亚组比较显示,不同种类的脱敏剂之间存在高度异质性。使用酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙(CPP-ACP)和精氨酸-CaCO3 对即刻粘结强度没有负面影响,而其他脱敏剂则有一定影响。
不同的脱敏剂对微拉伸粘结强度有不同的影响。可以根据粘结强度选择脱敏剂,特别是在牙体预备后用于缓解牙齿敏感。