Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Dec;11(6):371-375. doi: 10.1007/s40037-021-00651-2. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
The Vanderbilt Community Circle (VC2) was designed to provide all faculty, staff, and students within the entire Vanderbilt University Medical Center community a dedicated venue to discuss current events and ongoing societal issues.
During the 2017-18 academic year, four VC2 events were held on: "Race, identity, and conflict in America," "Gun violence in America," "Gender in the workplace," and "Immigration in America." Facilitators guided participants to share their views and perspectives on these matters with pre-developed open-ended questions. Attendees started discussions in small groups and then eventually combined into a large one. Pre- and post-event surveys were administered to measure the program's effectiveness.
One-hundred and twenty-four participants were included, 75 of whom completed both the pre- and post-event surveys. Sixty-four of the 75 (85%) agreed or strongly agreed that "multiple perspectives and opinions were represented" and 73% felt that their "own perspective was broadened on the issue." Most (89%) believed that the format and setting of the event was conducive to dialogue and discussion, and almost all (91%) reported that they would attend a similar event in the future. Groningen Reflection Ability Scale scores were high before (94 [25th-75th: 88-99]) and remained high after the events (93 [25th-75th: 88-93.3], p > 0.05).
We successfully implemented a medical center-wide, recurring current events and dialogue forum in hopes of increasing reflection, unity, and understanding across our own community.
范德比尔特社区圈(VC2)旨在为范德比尔特大学医学中心的所有教职员工和学生提供一个专门的场所,讨论当前事件和正在进行的社会问题。
在 2017-18 学年,共举办了四次 VC2 活动,主题分别为:“美国的种族、身份和冲突”、“美国的枪支暴力”、“工作场所的性别”和“美国的移民”。主持人引导参与者围绕这些问题分享他们的观点和看法,并使用预先制定的开放式问题。与会者首先在小组中展开讨论,然后最终合并成一个大组。在活动前后进行了问卷调查,以衡量该项目的效果。
共有 124 名参与者,其中 75 名完成了活动前后的问卷调查。75 名参与者中有 64 名(85%)表示同意或强烈同意“代表了多种观点和意见”,73% 的人认为他们“对这个问题的看法更加开阔”。大多数(89%)人认为活动的形式和环境有利于对话和讨论,几乎所有人(91%)表示他们将来会参加类似的活动。活动前后的格罗宁根反思能力量表评分均较高(活动前:94 [25 分位数-75 分位数:88-99];活动后:93 [25 分位数-75 分位数:88-93.3],p>0.05)。
我们成功地实施了一个全医学中心范围内的、定期的时事和对话论坛,希望能够增进我们社区内部的反思、团结和理解。