• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便免疫化学检测水平与国家结直肠癌筛查计划中病理结果的相关性。

Correlation of Fecal Immunochemical Testing Levels With Pathology Results in a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.

机构信息

Center for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland.

National Screening Service, Kings Inn House, Dublin 1, Ireland.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):e00277. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000277.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000277
PMID:33512944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7806233/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) positivity is determined by a threshold decided by individual screening programs. Data are limited on correlation between FIT levels and pathology identified at colonoscopy. Our aim was to examine the correlation between FIT levels and pathology identified in a national colorectal cancer screening program.

METHODS

FIT levels (n = 9,271) were analyzed and correlated with patient demographics and pathology identified, including adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, number/size of adenomas, and presence of dysplasia. Levels were divided into 2 categories: FIT levels were defined as "high" or "low" based on whether they were above or below the median (479 ngHb/mL). Multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 8,084 patients (87%) underwent colonoscopy. Those younger than 65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.267, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.107-1.45, P = 0.001), those with an adenoma >10 mm (OR 1.736, 95% CI 01.512-1.991, P < 0.001), and those with left-sided adenomas (OR 1.484, 95% CI 1.266-1.74, P < 0.001) had higher FIT levels. Cancers (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.09-3.75, P < 0.001) and high-grade dysplasia (OR 1.356, 95% CI 1.08-1.7, P = 0.008) had higher FIT levels, but varied greatly. The number of adenomas was not significant.

DISCUSSION

In this study, FIT levels were high for left-sided and large adenomas, suggesting that FIT has poor sensitivity for detection of diminutive and right-sided neoplasia. FIT levels had no association with gender and declined with age. Adenoma burden did not correlate with FIT levels; this is a novel finding. FIT levels vary greatly even in those with advanced neoplasia; therefore, FIT is unlikely to be useful as a risk stratification tool.

摘要

简介

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的阳性结果由各个筛查项目确定的阈值决定。目前有关 FIT 水平与结肠镜检查中发现的病理学之间相关性的数据有限。我们的目的是研究全国结直肠癌筛查项目中 FIT 水平与病理学之间的相关性。

方法

分析了 9271 例 FIT 水平,并将其与患者的人口统计学特征和病理学特征进行了相关性分析,包括腺瘤、无蒂锯齿状病变、腺瘤的数量/大小以及是否存在异型增生。水平分为 2 类:根据是否高于或低于中位数(479ngHb/mL),将 FIT 水平定义为“高”或“低”。进行了多变量分析。

结果

共有 8084 例患者(87%)接受了结肠镜检查。年龄小于 65 岁的患者(比值比 [OR] 1.267,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.107-1.45,P = 0.001)、腺瘤>10mm 的患者(OR 1.736,95%CI 01.512-1.991,P<0.001)和左半结肠腺瘤患者(OR 1.484,95%CI 1.266-1.74,P<0.001)的 FIT 水平较高。癌症(OR 2.8,95%CI 2.09-3.75,P<0.001)和高级别异型增生(OR 1.356,95%CI 1.08-1.7,P = 0.008)的 FIT 水平较高,但差异很大。腺瘤的数量没有显著相关性。

讨论

在这项研究中,左半结肠和大腺瘤的 FIT 水平较高,表明 FIT 对检测微小和右半结肠肿瘤的敏感性较差。FIT 水平与性别无关,且随年龄增长而下降。腺瘤负担与 FIT 水平无关;这是一个新的发现。即使在有进展性肿瘤的患者中,FIT 水平也差异很大;因此,FIT 不太可能作为一种风险分层工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c5/7806233/39903d508018/ct9-12-e00277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c5/7806233/39903d508018/ct9-12-e00277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6c5/7806233/39903d508018/ct9-12-e00277-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Correlation of Fecal Immunochemical Testing Levels With Pathology Results in a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.粪便免疫化学检测水平与国家结直肠癌筛查计划中病理结果的相关性。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):e00277. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000277.
2
The multitarget fecal immunochemical test versus the fecal immunochemical test for programmatic colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional intervention study with paired design.多靶点粪便免疫化学试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于结直肠癌筛查项目:一项具有配对设计的横断面干预研究。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):1299. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10372-2.
3
Higher risk of advanced histology in adenoma less than 10 mm in fecal immunochemical test screening: Implication for management.粪便免疫化学试验筛查中直径小于 10mm 的腺瘤有进展为高级别组织学的更高风险:对管理的启示。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;35(10):1738-1745. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15040. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Impact of a higher fecal immunochemistry test cut-off on pathology detected in subsequent rounds of a colorectal screening program.更高的粪便免疫化学检测截断值对后续轮次结直肠筛查项目中检出的病理结果的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):518-522. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
5
Equivalency of fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy in familial colorectal cancer screening.粪便免疫化学检测与结肠镜检查在家族性结直肠癌筛查中的等效性。
Gastroenterology. 2014 Nov;147(5):1021-30.e1; quiz e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
6
Fecal Immunochemical Test Detects Sessile Serrated Adenomas and Polyps With a Low Level of Sensitivity.粪便免疫化学试验检测带蒂锯齿状腺瘤和息肉的灵敏度较低。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun;15(6):872-879.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.029. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
7
[Efficacy comparison among high risk factors questionnaire and Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score and their combinations with fecal immunochemical test in screening advanced colorectal tumor].[高危因素问卷与亚太地区结直肠癌筛查评分及其与粪便免疫化学检测联合应用在筛查进展期结直肠癌中的效果比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jul 25;25(7):612-620. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20211127-00478.
8
High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases.泰国人群中晚期结直肠肿瘤的高患病率:1404例病例的前瞻性结肠镜筛查
BMC Gastroenterol. 2016 Aug 23;16(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12876-016-0526-0.
9
Low Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Blood-Based Markers of DNA Hypermethylation for Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas/Polyps.粪便免疫化学检测和基于血液的 DNA 高甲基化标志物对检测无蒂锯齿状腺瘤/息肉的敏感性低。
Dig Dis Sci. 2019 Sep;64(9):2555-2562. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05569-8. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
10
Predictive Modeling of Colonoscopic Findings in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.基于粪便免疫化学试验的结直肠癌筛查计划中结肠镜检查结果的预测模型。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jul;67(7):2842-2848. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07160-6. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Colon lesions in elderly individuals with positive and negative fecal immunochemical test results among PERSIAN Guilan cohort study (PGCS) population.波斯湾吉兰队列研究(PGCS)人群中粪便免疫化学检测结果呈阳性和阴性的老年个体的结肠病变
Caspian J Intern Med. 2025 Dec 24;16(3):451-457. doi: 10.22088/cjim.16.3.451. eCollection 2025 Summer.
2
Faecal haemoglobin concentration and colorectal cancer site, stage and grade in a symptomatic cohort.有症状队列中的粪便血红蛋白浓度与结直肠癌的部位、分期及分级
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Dec;26(12):2039-2045. doi: 10.1111/codi.17187. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Diagnostic application of the ColonFlag AI tool in combination with faecal immunochemical test in patients on an urgent lower gastrointestinal cancer pathway.
在紧急下消化道癌症诊疗流程中,ColonFlag人工智能工具与粪便免疫化学检测相结合的诊断应用。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 16;11(1):e001372. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2024-001372.
4
Sessile serrated polyp detection rates after fecal immunochemical test or multitarget stool DNA test: Systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便免疫化学检测或多靶点粪便DNA检测后无蒂锯齿状息肉的检出率:系统评价与Meta分析
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Apr 5;12(4):E474-E487. doi: 10.1055/a-2256-3411. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Accuracy of a faecal immunochemical test in patients under colonoscopy surveillance of colorectal adenoma and cancer.结肠镜监测结直肠腺瘤和癌症患者粪便免疫化学检测的准确性。
Ups J Med Sci. 2023 Jun 23;128. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v128.8869. eCollection 2023.
6
Faecal immunochemical testing for haemoglobin in detecting bowel polyps in symptomatic patients: multicentre prospective cohort study.粪便免疫化学检测血红蛋白在有症状患者中检测肠息肉的应用:多中心前瞻性队列研究。
BJS Open. 2023 Mar 7;7(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac161.
7
Using fecal immunochemical test values below conventional cut-off to individualize colorectal cancer screening.利用低于传统临界值的粪便免疫化学检测值来个体化结直肠癌筛查。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E413-E419. doi: 10.1055/a-1743-2651. eCollection 2022 Apr.