• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用低于传统临界值的粪便免疫化学检测值来个体化结直肠癌筛查。

Using fecal immunochemical test values below conventional cut-off to individualize colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Plantener Eva, Deding Ulrik, Madsen Jeppe Buur, Kroijer Rasmus, Madsen Jonna Skov, Baatrup Gunnar

机构信息

Odense University Hospital, Department of Surgery, Svendborg, Denmark.

University of Southern Denmark, Department of Clinical Research, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E413-E419. doi: 10.1055/a-1743-2651. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1055/a-1743-2651
PMID:35528219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9068275/
Abstract

Of the participants in the Danish screening program, 89.9 % to 92.5 % have fecal immunochemical test (FIT) values < 10 μg/g feces (equivalent to 50 ng hemoglobin/mL buffer). This study aimed to investigate the risk of interval colorectal cancer (CRC) in this group before the next biennial screening round. This cohort study included all citizens from the region of Southern Denmark who participated in the Danish bowel screening program from 2014 trough 2016 and had a FIT value < 10 μg/g feces. Individuals receiving a CRC diagnosis were identified through the national CRC registry, with a follow up of 2 years corresponding to the current screening interval. We also examined the 3-year CRC incidence. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.  Data from 185,654 citizens presenting with a FIT value < 10 μg/g feces were eligible for analysis. Overall, interval CRC incidence was 0.07 % within 2 years with HRs of 4.16 (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.67;6.48) and 5.8 (95 % CI 3.34;10.05) for FIT values of 4 to 6.9 μg/g feces and 7 to 9.9 μg/g feces, respectively, compared to those having a FIT value below the limit of quantification of 4 μg/g feces. After 3 years, the overall CRC incidence increased to 0.14 %; however, this was not significant. This study demonstrates a positive correlation between FIT value and risk of interval cancer even for very low values. It further suggests that an increase in the screening interval could be reasonable in the low FIT categories.

摘要

在丹麦筛查项目的参与者中,89.9%至92.5%的人粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)值<10μg/g粪便(相当于50ng血红蛋白/mL缓冲液)。本研究旨在调查该组在下一轮两年一次的筛查之前发生间期结直肠癌(CRC)的风险。这项队列研究纳入了2014年至2016年参与丹麦肠道筛查项目且FIT值<10μg/g粪便的丹麦南部地区所有公民。通过国家CRC登记处确定接受CRC诊断的个体,并进行了相当于当前筛查间隔的2年随访。我们还检查了3年CRC发病率。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型估计风险比(HRs)。185,654名FIT值<10μg/g粪便的公民的数据符合分析条件。总体而言,2年内间期CRC发病率为0.07%,粪便FIT值为4至6.9μg/g和7至9.9μg/g的人群,与FIT值低于定量下限4μg/g的人群相比,HR分别为4.16(95%置信区间[CI]2.67;6.48)和5.8(95%CI 3.34;10.05)。3年后,总体CRC发病率升至0.14%;然而,这并不显著。这项研究表明,即使FIT值非常低,其与间期癌症风险之间也存在正相关。它进一步表明,对于低FIT类别,延长筛查间隔可能是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/e798778dc72c/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/7b9eee84fa63/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/b8f7e87a0a51/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/e798778dc72c/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/7b9eee84fa63/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/b8f7e87a0a51/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8af/9068275/e798778dc72c/10-1055-a-1743-2651-i2456ei3.jpg

相似文献

1
Using fecal immunochemical test values below conventional cut-off to individualize colorectal cancer screening.利用低于传统临界值的粪便免疫化学检测值来个体化结直肠癌筛查。
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E413-E419. doi: 10.1055/a-1743-2651. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Association Between Concentrations of Hemoglobin Determined by Fecal Immunochemical Tests and Long-term Development of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia.粪便免疫化学检测血红蛋白浓度与结直肠高级别腺瘤长期进展的相关性。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov;153(5):1251-1259.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.034. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
3
Factors associated with interval colorectal cancer after negative FIT: Results of two screening rounds in the Dutch FIT-based CRC screening program.阴性粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)后与结直肠癌间隔期相关的因素:荷兰基于 FIT 的 CRC 筛查计划中两次筛查轮次的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2023 Apr 15;152(8):1536-1546. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34373. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Lower Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Values Improve Detection of Colorectal Cancer in System-Level Screens.较低的粪便免疫化学检测截断值可提高系统层面筛查结直肠癌的检出率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):647-653. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.077. Epub 2019 May 11.
5
Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age.第一轮粪便免疫化学筛选试验阴性结果后间隔期结直肠癌的发生率,按截止值和参与者的性别及年龄划分。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;18(7):1493-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
6
Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.多次粪便免疫化学检测受试者的间期结直肠癌发病率。
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):439-447.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Impact of a higher fecal immunochemistry test cut-off on pathology detected in subsequent rounds of a colorectal screening program.更高的粪便免疫化学检测截断值对后续轮次结直肠筛查项目中检出的病理结果的影响。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar;89(3):518-522. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.015. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
8
Colorectal Cancer Stage Distribution at First and Repeat Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening.首次和重复粪便免疫化学检测筛查中结直肠癌的分布阶段。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Dec;21(13):3424-3432.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.07.028. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
9
Interval cancers in a population-based screening program for colorectal cancer with gender-specific cut-off levels for fecal immunochemical test.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查计划中,粪便免疫化学试验采用性别特异性截断值时的间隔期癌症。
J Med Screen. 2022 Sep;29(3):156-165. doi: 10.1177/09691413221085218. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
The second round of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program: Impact of an increased fecal immunochemical test cut-off level on yield of screening.荷兰结直肠癌筛查项目第二轮:粪便免疫化学检测截断值提高对筛查效果的影响。
Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 15;147(4):1098-1106. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32839. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the Transverse Colon Overlooked? Establishing a Comprehensive Colonoscopy Database from a Multicenter Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.横结肠是否被忽视了?通过一项多中心整群随机对照试验建立一个全面的结肠镜检查数据库。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;15(5):591. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050591.
2
National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea.韩国的国家结直肠癌筛查计划。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2023 Dec;105(6):333-340. doi: 10.4174/astr.2023.105.6.333. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Interval cancers in a national colorectal screening programme based on faecal immunochemical testing: Implications for faecal haemoglobin concentration threshold and sex inequality.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer incidence, mortality, and stage distribution in European countries in the colorectal cancer screening era: an international population-based study.结直肠癌筛查时代欧洲国家结直肠癌发病、死亡和分期分布:一项基于人群的国际研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):1002-1013. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00199-6. Epub 2021 May 25.
2
Piloting gender-oriented colorectal cancer screening with a faecal immunochemical test: population-based registry study from Finland.采用粪便免疫化学检测进行面向性别的结直肠癌筛查试点:芬兰基于人群的登记研究
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 8;11(2):e046667. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046667.
3
基于粪便免疫化学检测的全国性结直肠癌筛查项目中的间期癌:对粪便血红蛋白浓度阈值及性别不平等的影响
J Med Screen. 2024 Mar;31(1):21-27. doi: 10.1177/09691413231188252. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities in interval colorectal cancer are explained by differences in faecal haemoglobin concentration and age: a register-based cohort study.社会经济不平等与结直肠间期癌的关系:基于注册的队列研究。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023 May;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001113.
5
Colon Cancer Screening Methods: 2023 Update.结肠癌筛查方法:2023年更新
Cureus. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):e37509. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37509. eCollection 2023 Apr.
6
Faecal haemoglobin concentrations are associated with all-cause mortality and cause of death in colorectal cancer screening.粪便血红蛋白浓度与结直肠癌筛查的全因死亡率和死因有关。
BMC Med. 2023 Jan 24;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02724-3.
The optimal cut-off value in fit-based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study.
基于拟合的结直肠癌筛查的最佳截断值:一项观察性研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Mar;10(5):1872-1879. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3761. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Correlation of Fecal Immunochemical Testing Levels With Pathology Results in a National Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.粪便免疫化学检测水平与国家结直肠癌筛查计划中病理结果的相关性。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):e00277. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000277.
5
Interval colorectal cancers after negative faecal immunochemical test in a 13-year screening programme.在一项为期 13 年的筛查计划中,粪便免疫化学检测阴性后的间隔期结肠癌。
J Med Screen. 2021 Jun;28(2):131-139. doi: 10.1177/0969141320918613. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Incidence of Interval Colorectal Cancer After Negative Results From First-Round Fecal Immunochemical Screening Tests, by Cutoff Value and Participant Sex and Age.第一轮粪便免疫化学筛选试验阴性结果后间隔期结直肠癌的发生率,按截止值和参与者的性别及年龄划分。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jun;18(7):1493-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives.癌症筛查中的粪便免疫化学检测——粪便免疫化学检测阳性和阴性者的结肠镜检查结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Mar;54(3):303-310. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1585569. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
8
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Detecting Earlier-Stage Disease-A Nationwide Cohort Study in Denmark.丹麦全国队列研究:结直肠癌筛查对检出早期疾病的效果。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Jul;155(1):99-106. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.062. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Validity of data in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database.丹麦结直肠癌筛查数据库中数据的有效性。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 17;9:105-111. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S124454. eCollection 2017.
10
Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database.丹麦结直肠癌组数据库
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Oct 25;8:465-468. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S99481. eCollection 2016.