Third Medical Department with Hematology, Medical Oncology, Rheumatology and Infectiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Salzburg Cancer Research Institute Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Salzburg, Austria.
Third Medical Department with Hematology, Medical Oncology, Rheumatology and Infectiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Salzburg Cancer Research Institute Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Salzburg, Austria.
Lancet Haematol. 2021 Feb;8(2):e135-e148. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30374-4.
Approval of hypomethylating agents in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia is based on trials done in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. We aimed to investigate whether hypomethylating agents provide a benefit in subgroups of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia compared with other treatments.
For this retrospective cohort study, data were retrieved between Nov 30, 2017, and Jan 5, 2019, from 38 centres in the USA and Europe. We included non-selected, consecutive patients diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia, who received chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia-directed therapy. Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia according to 2016 WHO criteria at initial diagnosis (ie, ≥20% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood) or with unavailability of treatment data were excluded. Outcomes assessed included overall survival, time to next treatment, and time to transformation to acute myeloid leukaemia. Analyses were adjusted by age, sex, platelet count, and Chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia-Specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS). Patients were grouped by first received treatment with either hydroxyurea, hypomethylating agents, or intensive chemotherapy, and stratified by risk according to blast count, French-American-British subtype, CPSS, WHO 2016 subtype, and the eligibility criteria of the DACOTA trial (NCT02214407).
949 patients diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia between April 13, 1981, and Oct 26, 2018, were included. Median follow-up was 23·4 months (IQR 11·5-42·3) from diagnosis and 16·2 months (6·6-31·6) from start of first-line treatment. 412 (43%) of 949 patients received hypomethylating agents as first treatment, 391 (41%) hydroxyurea, and 83 (9%) intensive chemotherapy. Adjusted median overall survival for patients treated with hydroxyurea versus hypomethylating agents was 15·6 months (95% CI 13·1-17·3) versus 20·7 months (17·9-23·4); hazard ratio (HR) 1·39 (1·17-1·65; p=0·0002) and 14·0 months (9·8-17·2) versus 20·7 months (17·9-23·4; HR 1·55 [1·16-2·05]; p=0·0027) for those treated with intensive chemotherapy versus hypomethylating agents. In patients with myeloproliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (myeloproliferative CMML), median overall survival was 12·6 months (10·7-15·0) versus 17·6 months (14·8-21·5; HR 1·38 [1·12-1·70]; p=0·0027) for patients treated with hydroxyurea versus hypomethylating agents, and 12·3 months (8·4-16·6) versus 17·6 months (14·8-21·5; HR 1·44 [1·02-2·03]; p=0·040) for intensive chemotherapy versus hypomethylating agents. Hypomethylating agents did not confer an overall survival advantage for patients classified as having lower-risk disease (ie, myelodysplastic chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia with <10% blasts, CMML-0, or lower-risk CPSS).
These data suggest hypomethylating agents as the preferred therapy for patients with higher-risk chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and those with myeloproliferative CMML. Our findings also suggest that CPSS is a valuable tool to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from hypomethylating agents. Further evidence from prospective cohorts would be desirable.
The Austrian Group for Medical Tumor Therapy.
批准低甲基化剂用于慢性髓单核细胞白血病患者是基于在骨髓增生异常综合征患者中进行的试验。我们旨在研究低甲基化剂是否与其他治疗方法相比,为慢性髓单核细胞白血病患者的亚组提供益处。
对于这项回顾性队列研究,我们于 2017 年 11 月 30 日至 2019 年 1 月 5 日期间从美国和欧洲的 38 个中心检索了数据。我们纳入了未选择的、连续诊断为慢性髓单核细胞白血病的患者,他们接受了慢性髓单核细胞白血病定向治疗。在初始诊断时根据 2016 年 WHO 标准(即骨髓或外周血中≥20%的原始细胞)患有急性髓细胞白血病或无法获得治疗数据的患者被排除在外。评估的结果包括总生存期、下一次治疗时间和转化为急性髓细胞白血病的时间。分析通过年龄、性别、血小板计数和慢性髓单核细胞白血病特异性预后评分系统(CPSS)进行调整。根据患者首次接受羟基脲、低甲基化剂或强化化疗的治疗分组,并根据 blast 计数、法国-美国-英国亚型、CPSS、WHO 2016 亚型和 DACOTA 试验(NCT02214407)的入选标准进行分层。
共纳入 1981 年 4 月 13 日至 2018 年 10 月 26 日期间诊断的 949 例慢性髓单核细胞白血病患者。从诊断到一线治疗开始的中位随访时间为 23.4 个月(IQR 11.5-42.3),从诊断到一线治疗开始的中位随访时间为 16.2 个月(6.6-31.6)。949 例患者中,412 例(43%)接受低甲基化剂作为一线治疗,391 例(41%)接受羟基脲治疗,83 例(9%)接受强化化疗。与羟基脲相比,接受低甲基化剂治疗的患者的中位总生存期为 15.6 个月(95%CI 13.1-17.3)与 20.7 个月(17.9-23.4);风险比(HR)为 1.39(1.17-1.65;p=0.0002),与 14.0 个月(9.8-17.2)与 20.7 个月(17.9-23.4;HR 1.55 [1.16-2.05];p=0.0027)相比,接受强化化疗的患者与低甲基化剂相比。在骨髓增生性慢性髓单核细胞白血病(骨髓增生性 CMML)患者中,与羟基脲相比,中位总生存期为 12.6 个月(10.7-15.0)与 17.6 个月(14.8-21.5);风险比(HR)为 1.38(1.12-1.70);p=0.0027),与 12.3 个月(8.4-16.6)与 17.6 个月(14.8-21.5);风险比(HR)为 1.44(1.02-2.03);p=0.040)与低甲基化剂相比,强化化疗。对于被归类为低危疾病的患者(即骨髓增生异常综合征伴<10%的原始细胞、CMML-0 或低危 CPSS),低甲基化剂并未带来总体生存优势。
这些数据表明,低甲基化剂是治疗高危慢性髓单核细胞白血病患者和骨髓增生性 CMML 患者的首选治疗方法。我们的研究结果还表明,CPSS 是识别最有可能从低甲基化剂中获益的患者的有用工具。还需要来自前瞻性队列的进一步证据。
奥地利医学肿瘤学研究组。