• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经骨凿技术行窦底提升术,不使用生物材料。

Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad de Sevilla, 41009 Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031103.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031103
PMID:33513756
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908564/
Abstract

According to classic Hirschfeld studies, the first teeth to be lost are the first and second maxillary molars. After the teeth are extracted and the alveolar process is developed, the maxillary sinus is reabsorbed and pneumatized with a decrease in bone availability in the posterior sector of the maxilla. This process often creates the need to perform regeneration techniques for the placement of implants in this area due to the low availability of bone. The most frequently used and documented technique for the elevation of the sinus maxillary floor is elevation by the side window, as proposed by Tatum. In 1994, Summers proposed a technique that allowed the elevation of the sinus floor from a crestal access using an instrument called an osteotome, as well as the placement of the implant in the same surgical act. The aimed of the study was to evaluate the survival of 32 implants placed in posterior maxilla with bone availability less than 5 mm performing a sinus lift augmentation technique with osteotome without biomaterials. The results of this study show a survival rate of 100% for 32 implants placed in situations with an initial bone availability of 2 to 5 mm without the use of graft material. The infra-drilling technique used offers an increase in the primary stability of implants that allows adequate osteointegration Implants placed were charged at 12 weeks. In all cases, spontaneous bone formation was observed, even in cases where a positive Valsalva maneuver was observed. This proposed technique reduces treatment time and the need for more invasive maxillary sinus augmentation techniques.

摘要

根据经典的 Hirschfeld 研究,最先脱落的牙齿是上颌第一和第二磨牙。拔牙后,牙槽骨发育,上颌窦被吸收并发生气腔化,上颌后区的骨量减少。由于骨量不足,这个过程通常需要进行再生技术,以便在该区域植入种植体。最常使用和记录的上颌窦底提升技术是 Tatum 提出的侧壁开窗提升术。1994 年,Summers 提出了一种技术,该技术允许使用称为骨凿的器械从牙槽嵴顶进入来提升窦底,并在同一手术中植入种植体。本研究的目的是评估在骨量小于 5mm 的情况下,使用无生物材料的骨凿窦提升技术,在后上颌放置 32 个种植体的存活率。本研究结果显示,在初始骨量为 2 至 5mm 的情况下,不使用移植物材料,32 个种植体的存活率为 100%。使用的亚钻孔技术为植入物提供了更高的初始稳定性,从而允许进行充分的骨整合。植入物在 12 周时进行充电。在所有情况下,均观察到了自发性骨形成,即使在观察到阳性瓦尔萨尔瓦动作的情况下也是如此。该技术减少了治疗时间和对更具侵入性的上颌窦提升技术的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/262010bff4c1/ijerph-18-01103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/143e57f4c240/ijerph-18-01103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/0205839b2c36/ijerph-18-01103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/8b51cdeaab4b/ijerph-18-01103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/8c517ead882f/ijerph-18-01103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/4be3de245ef5/ijerph-18-01103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/262010bff4c1/ijerph-18-01103-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/143e57f4c240/ijerph-18-01103-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/0205839b2c36/ijerph-18-01103-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/8b51cdeaab4b/ijerph-18-01103-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/8c517ead882f/ijerph-18-01103-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/4be3de245ef5/ijerph-18-01103-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e4f6/7908564/262010bff4c1/ijerph-18-01103-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Sinus Floor Elevation via an Osteotome Technique without Biomaterials.经骨凿技术行窦底提升术,不使用生物材料。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 27;18(3):1103. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031103.
2
Osteotome sinus floor elevation without bone grafts--a 3-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.骨凿窦底提升术不植骨--应用 AstraTech 种植体的 3 年回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):198-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00254.x. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
3
Extra-Short Implants with Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation: A Prospective Clinical Study.骨凿上颌窦底提升并用超短种植体:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Mar/Apr;35(2):415-422. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7950.
4
Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants--a 1-year retrospective study with Astra Tech implants.骨凿上颌窦底提升术与种植体同期植入——一项使用Astra Tech种植体的1年回顾性研究
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008 Mar;10(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00062.x.
5
[Crestal core elevation technique--case series and literature review].[嵴顶骨核提升技术——病例系列及文献综述]
Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993). 2008 Apr;25(2):27-35, 74.
6
Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.使用(经牙槽嵴)骨凿技术进行上颌窦底提升术,有无植入材料。第一部分:种植体存留率及患者感受。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jul;20(7):667-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01704.x. Epub 2009 May 26.
7
Clinical evaluation of modified transalveolar sinus floor elevation and osteotome sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.改良经牙槽嵴窦底提升术与骨凿窦底提升术在上颌后牙区的临床评估:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Sep 14;19(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2879-x.
8
Placement of tapered implants using an osteotome sinus floor elevation technique without bone grafting: 1-year results.使用骨凿进行上颌窦底提升技术且不植骨植入锥形种植体:1年随访结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Jul-Aug;24(4):727-33.
9
Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.上颌窦提升术对骨内种植体存留率的影响。一项系统评价。
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):328-43. doi: 10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.328.
10
Crestal Window Sinus Lift and Its Long-Term Clinical Outcomes.牙槽嵴开窗式上颌窦提升术及其长期临床疗效
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 September/October;40(5):757–764. doi: 10.11607/prd.4292. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and radiological outcomes of osseodensification and crestal approach sinus kit for transcrestal sinus elevation - A randomized clinical trial.经牙槽嵴入路使用骨致密化和牙槽嵴顶入路鼻窦套件进行上颌窦提升术的临床和影像学结果——一项随机临床试验
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2025 Apr 24;22:17. doi: 10.4103/drj.drj_711_23. eCollection 2025.
2
Does ozone gel enhance the bone width and buccal plate of bone thickness surrounding the implant following osseodensification? A randomized controlled clinical trial.在骨致密化后,臭氧凝胶是否会增加种植体周围骨宽度和颊侧骨板厚度?一项随机对照临床试验。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr 14;29(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01367-x.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of the Simultaneous Use of Biomaterials in Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Humans.评价生物材料在牙槽嵴窦内提升术中的联合应用:一项针对人类的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 14;17(6):1888. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061888.
2
Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants (≤6 mm): A meta-analysis.短种植体(≤6mm)功能时间对其可预测性的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Mar;47(3):403-415. doi: 10.1111/joor.12925. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
Change in Crown-to-Implant Ratio of Implants Placed in Grafted and Nongrafted Posterior Maxillary Sites: A 5-year Prospective Randomized Study.
Evaluation of accuracy and membrane perforation in robotic-assisted implant surgery for transalveolar sinus floor elevation: a retrospective case series.
经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升机器人辅助种植手术的准确性及膜穿孔评估:一项回顾性病例系列研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05848-z.
4
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Transalveolar Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation with Rotatory Instruments: An 8-Year Follow-Up Prospective Clinical Study.使用旋转器械进行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升术的长期临床结果:一项8年随访的前瞻性临床研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 9;14(2):365. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020365.
5
Radiographic Study of Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Using Osseodensification Technique with Graft Material: A Pilot Study.使用植骨材料的骨致密化技术进行经牙槽嵴上颌窦底提升的影像学研究:一项初步研究。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2024 May 4;9(5):276. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9050276.
6
Long-term effectiveness of UV functionalised short (≤ 6 mm) dental implants placed in the posterior segments of the atrophied maxilla: controlled case series.经紫外线功能化处理的短(≤6mm)牙科种植体在前萎缩上颌后段的长期效果:对照病例系列研究。
Odontology. 2024 Oct;112(4):1316-1325. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00926-0. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
7
Biomechanical analysis of the maxillary sinus floor membrane during internal sinus floor elevation with implants at different angles of the maxillary sinus angles.在上颌窦不同角度植入种植体进行上颌窦底内提升时上颌窦底膜的生物力学分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2024 Mar 12;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40729-024-00530-5.
8
Assessment of the intrasinusidal volume before and after maxillary sinus augmentation using mri - a pilot study of eight patients.使用 MRI 评估上颌窦提升前后的窦内容积 - 八例患者的初步研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 29;24(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03858-x.
9
Schneiderian Membrane Collateral Damage Caused by Collagenated and Non-Collagenated Xenografts: A Histological Study in Rabbits.胶原化和非胶原化异种移植物引起的鼻窦黏膜附带损伤:一项兔的组织学研究
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jan 26;11(2):31. doi: 10.3390/dj11020031.
10
Predictors of peri-implant bone remodeling outcomes after the osteotome sinus floor elevation: a retrospective study.经骨凿上颌窦底提升术后种植体周围骨重塑结局的预测因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 20;22(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02592-6.
种植体冠根比在前牙区和后牙区的变化:一项为期 5 年的前瞻性随机研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Sep/Oct;34(5):1231-1236. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6766.
4
Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting: A 10-Year Study of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography vs Periapical Radiography.不植骨的骨凿上颌窦底提升术:锥形束计算机断层扫描与根尖片的10年研究
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 May/Jun;39(3):e89-e97. doi: 10.11607/prd.3777.
5
Outcomes of maxillary sinus floor augmentation without grafts in atrophic maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials.萎缩性上颌骨无植骨上颌窦底提升术的疗效:基于随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Oral Rehabil. 2019 Mar;46(3):282-290. doi: 10.1111/joor.12753. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
6
What Is the Most Effective Rehabilitation Method for Posterior Maxillas With 4 to 8 mm of Residual Alveolar Bone Height Below the Maxillary Sinus With Implant-Supported Prostheses? A Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis.对于上颌窦下方剩余牙槽骨高度为4至8毫米的后牙区,采用种植支持式修复体时,最有效的修复方法是什么?一项频率学派网状Meta分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jan;77(1):70.e1-70.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
7
Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation.短种植体和常规种植体在剩余上颌牙槽嵴中的应用:36 个月随访观察。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 14;24:5645-5652. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910404.
8
Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation Without Grafting: A 10-Year Clinical and Cone-Beam Sinus Assessment.不使用移植物的窦底骨切开术提升:一项为期 10 年的临床和锥形束鼻窦评估。
Implant Dent. 2018 Aug;27(4):439-444. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000793.
9
4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.后牙区萎缩性颌骨增量骨中4毫米长种植体与更长种植体的比较:一项多中心随机对照试验的加载后1年结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):31-47.
10
Short dental implants as compared to maxillary sinus augmentation procedure for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla: Three-year results of a randomized clinical study.短种植体与上颌窦提升术在后牙游离缺失修复中的比较:一项随机临床研究的 3 年结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Feb;20(1):9-20. doi: 10.1111/cid.12563. Epub 2017 Nov 28.