Suppr超能文献

短种植体和常规种植体在剩余上颌牙槽嵴中的应用:36 个月随访观察。

Short Implants and Conventional Implants in The Residual Maxillary Alveolar Ridge: A 36-Month Follow-Up Observation.

机构信息

Department of Dental Surgery, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.

Department of Prosthodontics, Oral Rehabilitation Clinic, Poznań Medical University, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 14;24:5645-5652. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910404.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Short dental implants are considered an alternative method of treatment to the maxillary sinus elevation and bone augmentation procedure at the sites of a reduced alveolar ridge height. The aim of the study was to determine the most effective therapeutic approach for a single tooth replacement in a reduced maxillary alveolar crest. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 30 partially edentulous patients having a residual crestal height of 6 mm and a minimal width of the alveolar ridge of 6-7 mm: 15 patients received regular dental implants (OsseoSpeed™ L11 Ø4 mm and L13 Ø4 mm) and the implantation was preceded by the sinus lift procedure from a lateral window approach with the application of a xenogeneic bone graft, whereas the remaining 15 patients received short implants (OsseoSpeed™ L6 mm Ø4 mm) without the sinus lift and augmentation procedure. All implants were loaded with single non-splinted crowns. Radiological examination (CBCT, RVG) was performed before the surgery and after 36 months. Primary and secondary stabilization with Osstell ISQ® and Periotest® were assessed. RESULTS Good results in primary and secondary stability were achieved in both systems. The marginal bone level (MBL) loss was low (0.22±0.46 mm and 0.34±0.24 mm, for short and conventional implants, respectively). No significant difference in MBL between groups was found. CONCLUSIONS Short implants can be successfully used to support single crowns in the lateral part of the maxilla.

摘要

背景

短种植体被认为是上颌窦提升和牙槽嵴高度降低部位骨增量术的替代治疗方法。本研究的目的是确定在牙槽嵴高度降低的部位,用于单颗牙替代的最有效治疗方法。

材料与方法

我们招募了 30 名部分缺牙患者,牙槽嵴残余高度为 6mm,牙槽嵴最小宽度为 6-7mm:15 名患者接受常规种植体(OsseoSpeed™ L11 Ø4mm 和 L13 Ø4mm)治疗,在种植前采用外侧开窗法进行鼻窦提升术,并应用异种骨移植,而其余 15 名患者接受短种植体(OsseoSpeed™ L6mm Ø4mm)治疗,不进行鼻窦提升和骨增量术。所有种植体均采用单非夹板冠负载。手术前和 36 个月后进行放射学检查(CBCT、RVG)。采用 Osstell ISQ®和 Periotest®评估初级和次级稳定性。

结果

两种系统均实现了良好的初级和次级稳定性。边缘骨水平(MBL)丢失较低(短种植体和常规种植体分别为 0.22±0.46mm 和 0.34±0.24mm)。两组间 MBL 无显著差异。

结论

短种植体可成功用于支持上颌骨外侧的单冠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验