Suppr超能文献

在青少年和成年人进行中高强度体力活动时,ActiGraph GT3X+ 位置放置的可靠性在估计能量消耗方面的研究。

Reliability of ActiGraph GT3X+ placement location in the estimation of energy expenditure during moderate and high-intensity physical activities in young and older adults.

机构信息

HAVAE (Handicap, Aging, Autonomy, Environment) EA6310, Limoges University, Limoges, France.

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Parakou, Parakou, Benin.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(13):1489-1496. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1880689. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

WHO defines physical activity (PA) as any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure (EE). The purpose of this study was to compare the EE estimations by ActiGraph GT3X+ with a gold standard measurement, the portable gas analyser in a set of 3 different PAs. This cross-sectional study involved 56 participants, age range (years, [min, max]: young people [20, 33], older adults [65, 83]). Participants completed a single session of three experimental PAs including biking, treadmill walking, and treadmill running. Each participant wore five GT3X+ triaxial accelerometers and a portable gas analyser used as the gold standard measurement. The GT3X+ were placed on the wrists, the waist (centred at the pelvis), and the ankles. ActiGraph GT3X+ and MetaMax3B records were investigated through intraclass correlation coefficient. Magnitude of measurement error was estimated using Effect Size. The GT3X+ wrist and GT3X+ waist underestimated EE regardless of the PA type. The GT3X+ ankles strongly overestimated EE during biking (mean bias = 489 ± 392%) and walking (mean bias = 106 ± 58%), while it underestimated EE during running (mean bias = -47 ± 27%). The ActiGraph GT3X+ does not provide accurate EE estimates across a range of placement locations during moderate and high-intensity PA.

摘要

世界卫生组织将身体活动(PA)定义为骨骼肌产生的需要能量消耗(EE)的任何身体运动。本研究的目的是比较 ActiGraph GT3X+ 的 EE 估计值与便携式气体分析仪在 3 种不同 PA 中的金标准测量值。这项横断面研究涉及 56 名参与者,年龄范围(岁,[最小,最大]:年轻人[20,33],老年人[65,83])。参与者完成了三次实验性 PA 中的一次,包括骑自行车、跑步机步行和跑步机跑步。每位参与者佩戴五个 GT3X+三轴加速度计和一个便携式气体分析仪作为金标准测量。GT3X+ 分别佩戴在手腕、腰部(位于骨盆中心)和脚踝上。通过组内相关系数研究了 ActiGraph GT3X+ 和 MetaMax3B 的记录。使用效应量估计测量误差的幅度。无论 PA 类型如何,GT3X+ 手腕和 GT3X+ 腰部都低估了 EE。GT3X+ 脚踝在骑自行车时(平均偏差为 489 ± 392%)和步行时(平均偏差为 106 ± 58%)严重高估 EE,而在跑步时低估 EE(平均偏差为-47 ± 27%)。ActiGraph GT3X+ 在中高强度 PA 期间在各种位置均不能提供准确的 EE 估计值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验