de Gooijer Cornedine J, van der Noort Vincent, Stigt Jos A, Baas Paul, Biesma Bonne, Cornelissen Robin, van Walree Nico, van Heemst Robbert C, Soud Magdolen Youssef-El, Groen Harry J M, den Brekel Agnes J Staal-van, Buikhuisen Wieneke A, Bootsma Gerben P, Dammeijer Floris, van Tinteren Harm, Lalezari Ferry, Aerts Joachim G, Burgers Jacobus A
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):585-592. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30362-3. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Almost all patients with malignant mesothelioma eventually have disease progression after first-line therapy. Previous studies have investigated maintenance therapy, but none has shown a great effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of switch-maintenance gemcitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.
We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 18 hospitals in the Netherlands (NVALT19). We recruited patients aged older than 18 years with unresectable malignant mesothelioma with no evidence of disease progression after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy (with platinum and pemetrexed), who had a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and measurable or evaluable disease. Exclusion criteria were active uncontrolled infection or severe cardiac dysfunction, serious disabling conditions, symptomatic CNS metastases, radiotherapy within 2 weeks before enrolment, and concomitant use of any other drugs under investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to maintenance intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m on days 1 and 8, in cycles of 21 days) plus supportive care, or to best supportive care alone, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious intercurrent illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent, except for palliative radiotherapy. A CT scan of the thorax or abdomen (or both) and pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and repeated every 6 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all participants who received one or more doses of the study drug or had at least one visit for supportive care. Recruitment is now closed; treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR4132/NL3847.
Between March 20, 2014, and Feb 27, 2019, 130 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus supportive care (65 patients [50%]) or supportive care alone (65 patients [50%]). No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up was 36·5 months (95% CI 34·2 to not reached), and one patient in the supportive care group withdrew consent. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gemcitabine group (median 6·2 months [95% CI 4·6-8·7]) than in the supportive care group (3·2 months [2·8-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·71]; p=0·0002). The benefit was confirmed by masked independent central review (HR 0·49 [0·33-0·72]; p=0·0002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (52%) of 64 patients in the gemcitabine group and in ten (16%) of 62 patients in the supportive care group. The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, fatigue or asthenia, pain, and infection in the gemcitabine group, and pain, infection, and cough or dyspnoea in the supportive care group. One patient (2%) in the gemcitabine group died, due to a treatment-related infection.
Switch-maintenance gemcitabine, after first-line chemotherapy, significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with malignant mesothelioma. This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in treating malignant mesothelioma.
Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding) and Stichting NVALT studies.
几乎所有恶性间皮瘤患者在一线治疗后最终都会出现疾病进展。既往研究曾对维持治疗进行过调查,但均未显示出显著效果。我们旨在评估在一线化疗后无疾病进展的恶性间皮瘤患者中,转换维持使用吉西他滨的疗效和安全性。
我们在荷兰的18家医院开展了一项随机、开放标签的2期试验(NVALT19)。我们招募年龄大于18岁、患有不可切除的恶性间皮瘤且在至少四个周期的一线化疗(含铂和培美曲塞)后无疾病进展证据的患者,这些患者的世界卫生组织体能状态为0 - 2,器官功能良好,且疾病可测量或可评估。排除标准包括活动性未控制感染或严重心脏功能障碍、严重致残状况、有症状的中枢神经系统转移、入组前2周内接受过放疗以及同时使用任何其他正在研究的药物。患者采用最小化法随机分配(1:1),接受维持静脉注射吉西他滨(第1天和第8天剂量为1250 mg/m²,每21天为一个周期)加支持治疗,或仅接受最佳支持治疗,直至疾病进展、出现不可接受的毒性、发生严重并发疾病、患者要求停药或需要使用任何其他抗癌药物(姑息性放疗除外)。在基线时进行胸部或腹部(或两者)CT扫描及肺功能测试,并每6周重复一次。主要结局是意向性治疗人群的无进展生存期。对所有接受一剂或多剂研究药物或至少有一次支持治疗访视的参与者进行安全性分析。现已停止招募;治疗和随访仍在进行中。本研究已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NTR4132/NL3847。
在2014年3月20日至2019年2月27日期间,共纳入130例患者并随机分配至吉西他滨加支持治疗组(65例患者[50%])或仅支持治疗组(65例患者[50%])。无患者失访;中位随访时间为36.5个月(95%CI 34.2至未达到),支持治疗组有1例患者撤回同意。吉西他滨组的无进展生存期显著长于支持治疗组(中位6.2个月[95%CI 4.6 - 8.7]),而支持治疗组为3.2个月[2.8 - 4.1];风险比[HR] 0.48 [95%CI 0.33 - 0.71];p = 0.0002)。经盲态独立中央审查确认了该获益(HR 0.49 [0.33 - 0.72];p = 0.0002)。吉西他滨组64例患者中有33例(52%)发生3 - 4级不良事件,支持治疗组62例患者中有10例(16%)发生。吉西他滨组最常见的不良事件是贫血、中性粒细胞减少、疲劳或乏力、疼痛和感染,支持治疗组是疼痛、感染以及咳嗽或呼吸困难。吉西他滨组有1例患者(2%)因治疗相关感染死亡。
在恶性间皮瘤患者中,一线化疗后转换维持使用吉西他滨与仅接受最佳支持治疗相比,显著延长了无进展生存期。本研究证实了吉西他滨治疗恶性间皮瘤的活性。
荷兰癌症协会(Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding)和NVALT研究基金会。