• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

恶性间皮瘤患者一线化疗后换用维持性吉西他滨治疗(NVALT19):一项研究者发起的随机、开放标签的2期试验。

Switch-maintenance gemcitabine after first-line chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma (NVALT19): an investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

作者信息

de Gooijer Cornedine J, van der Noort Vincent, Stigt Jos A, Baas Paul, Biesma Bonne, Cornelissen Robin, van Walree Nico, van Heemst Robbert C, Soud Magdolen Youssef-El, Groen Harry J M, den Brekel Agnes J Staal-van, Buikhuisen Wieneke A, Bootsma Gerben P, Dammeijer Floris, van Tinteren Harm, Lalezari Ferry, Aerts Joachim G, Burgers Jacobus A

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Biometrics, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):585-592. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30362-3. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30362-3
PMID:33515500
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Almost all patients with malignant mesothelioma eventually have disease progression after first-line therapy. Previous studies have investigated maintenance therapy, but none has shown a great effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of switch-maintenance gemcitabine in patients with malignant mesothelioma without disease progression after first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 18 hospitals in the Netherlands (NVALT19). We recruited patients aged older than 18 years with unresectable malignant mesothelioma with no evidence of disease progression after at least four cycles of first-line chemotherapy (with platinum and pemetrexed), who had a WHO performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function, and measurable or evaluable disease. Exclusion criteria were active uncontrolled infection or severe cardiac dysfunction, serious disabling conditions, symptomatic CNS metastases, radiotherapy within 2 weeks before enrolment, and concomitant use of any other drugs under investigation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using the minimisation method, to maintenance intravenous gemcitabine (1250 mg/m on days 1 and 8, in cycles of 21 days) plus supportive care, or to best supportive care alone, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, serious intercurrent illness, patient request for discontinuation, or need for any other anticancer agent, except for palliative radiotherapy. A CT scan of the thorax or abdomen (or both) and pulmonary function tests were done at baseline and repeated every 6 weeks. The primary outcome was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all participants who received one or more doses of the study drug or had at least one visit for supportive care. Recruitment is now closed; treatment and follow-up are ongoing. This study is registered with the Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR4132/NL3847.

FINDINGS

Between March 20, 2014, and Feb 27, 2019, 130 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to gemcitabine plus supportive care (65 patients [50%]) or supportive care alone (65 patients [50%]). No patients were lost to follow-up; median follow-up was 36·5 months (95% CI 34·2 to not reached), and one patient in the supportive care group withdrew consent. Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the gemcitabine group (median 6·2 months [95% CI 4·6-8·7]) than in the supportive care group (3·2 months [2·8-4·1]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·71]; p=0·0002). The benefit was confirmed by masked independent central review (HR 0·49 [0·33-0·72]; p=0·0002). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 33 (52%) of 64 patients in the gemcitabine group and in ten (16%) of 62 patients in the supportive care group. The most frequent adverse events were anaemia, neutropenia, fatigue or asthenia, pain, and infection in the gemcitabine group, and pain, infection, and cough or dyspnoea in the supportive care group. One patient (2%) in the gemcitabine group died, due to a treatment-related infection.

INTERPRETATION

Switch-maintenance gemcitabine, after first-line chemotherapy, significantly prolonged progression-free survival compared with best supportive care alone, among patients with malignant mesothelioma. This study confirms the activity of gemcitabine in treating malignant mesothelioma.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding) and Stichting NVALT studies.

摘要

背景

几乎所有恶性间皮瘤患者在一线治疗后最终都会出现疾病进展。既往研究曾对维持治疗进行过调查,但均未显示出显著效果。我们旨在评估在一线化疗后无疾病进展的恶性间皮瘤患者中,转换维持使用吉西他滨的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们在荷兰的18家医院开展了一项随机、开放标签的2期试验(NVALT19)。我们招募年龄大于18岁、患有不可切除的恶性间皮瘤且在至少四个周期的一线化疗(含铂和培美曲塞)后无疾病进展证据的患者,这些患者的世界卫生组织体能状态为0 - 2,器官功能良好,且疾病可测量或可评估。排除标准包括活动性未控制感染或严重心脏功能障碍、严重致残状况、有症状的中枢神经系统转移、入组前2周内接受过放疗以及同时使用任何其他正在研究的药物。患者采用最小化法随机分配(1:1),接受维持静脉注射吉西他滨(第1天和第8天剂量为1250 mg/m²,每21天为一个周期)加支持治疗,或仅接受最佳支持治疗,直至疾病进展、出现不可接受的毒性、发生严重并发疾病、患者要求停药或需要使用任何其他抗癌药物(姑息性放疗除外)。在基线时进行胸部或腹部(或两者)CT扫描及肺功能测试,并每6周重复一次。主要结局是意向性治疗人群的无进展生存期。对所有接受一剂或多剂研究药物或至少有一次支持治疗访视的参与者进行安全性分析。现已停止招募;治疗和随访仍在进行中。本研究已在荷兰试验注册中心注册,注册号为NTR4132/NL3847。

结果

在2014年3月20日至2019年2月27日期间,共纳入130例患者并随机分配至吉西他滨加支持治疗组(65例患者[50%])或仅支持治疗组(65例患者[50%])。无患者失访;中位随访时间为36.5个月(95%CI 34.2至未达到),支持治疗组有1例患者撤回同意。吉西他滨组的无进展生存期显著长于支持治疗组(中位6.2个月[95%CI 4.6 - 8.7]),而支持治疗组为3.2个月[2.8 - 4.1];风险比[HR] 0.48 [95%CI 0.33 - 0.71];p = 0.0002)。经盲态独立中央审查确认了该获益(HR 0.49 [0.33 - 0.72];p = 0.0002)。吉西他滨组64例患者中有33例(52%)发生3 - 4级不良事件,支持治疗组62例患者中有10例(16%)发生。吉西他滨组最常见的不良事件是贫血、中性粒细胞减少、疲劳或乏力、疼痛和感染,支持治疗组是疼痛、感染以及咳嗽或呼吸困难。吉西他滨组有1例患者(2%)因治疗相关感染死亡。

解读

在恶性间皮瘤患者中,一线化疗后转换维持使用吉西他滨与仅接受最佳支持治疗相比,显著延长了无进展生存期。本研究证实了吉西他滨治疗恶性间皮瘤的活性。

资助

荷兰癌症协会(Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding)和NVALT研究基金会。

相似文献

1
Switch-maintenance gemcitabine after first-line chemotherapy in patients with malignant mesothelioma (NVALT19): an investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.恶性间皮瘤患者一线化疗后换用维持性吉西他滨治疗(NVALT19):一项研究者发起的随机、开放标签的2期试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):585-592. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30362-3. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
Maintenance therapy with vinflunine plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma with a response after first-line chemotherapy (MAJA; SOGUG 2011/02): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 2 trial.在一线化疗后有缓解的晚期尿路上皮癌患者中,使用长春氟宁联合最佳支持治疗与最佳支持治疗相比的维持治疗(MAJA;SOGUG 2011/02):一项多中心、随机、对照、开放标签、二期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):672-681a. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30242-5. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
3
Thalidomide versus active supportive care for maintenance in patients with malignant mesothelioma after first-line chemotherapy (NVALT 5): an open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study.沙利度胺对比一线化疗后恶性间皮瘤患者维持治疗中的积极支持性护理(NVALT 5):一项开放标签、多中心、随机 3 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):543-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70125-6. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
4
Dendritic cells loaded with allogeneic tumour cell lysate plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in patients with pleural mesothelioma as maintenance therapy after chemotherapy (DENIM): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2/3 study.树突状细胞负载同种异体肿瘤细胞裂解物联合最佳支持治疗与单纯最佳支持治疗在化疗后作为间皮瘤患者维持治疗中的比较(DENIM):一项多中心、开放标签、随机、2/3 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Jul;25(7):865-878. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00191-8. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
5
Gemcitabine with or without ramucirumab as second-line treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (RAMES): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.培美曲塞联合或不联合雷莫芦单抗二线治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤(RAMES):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、Ⅱ期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1438-1447. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00404-6. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
6
Tumour Treating Fields in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin as first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (STELLAR): a multicentre, single-arm phase 2 trial.肿瘤电场治疗联合培美曲塞和顺铂或卡铂作为不可切除恶性胸膜间皮瘤的一线治疗(STELLAR):一项多中心、单臂、Ⅱ期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1702-1709. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30532-7. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
7
Trilaciclib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.特立西布联合化疗对比单独化疗治疗转移性三阴性乳腺癌患者的多中心、随机、开放标签、二期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1587-1601. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30616-3. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
8
Pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (KEYNOTE-361): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.帕博利珠单抗单药或联合化疗对比化疗作为晚期尿路上皮癌一线治疗(KEYNOTE-361):一项随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jul;22(7):931-945. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00152-2. Epub 2021 May 26.
9
Irinotecan and Gemcitabine as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma following Platinum plus Pemetrexed Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study.伊立替康联合吉西他滨二线治疗培美曲塞联合铂类化疗失败的恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者的回顾性研究
Oncology. 2021;99(3):161-168. doi: 10.1159/000510691. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
10
Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.培美曲塞联合最佳支持治疗维持治疗对比安慰剂联合最佳支持治疗用于培美曲塞联合顺铂诱导治疗后的晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(PARAMOUNT):一项双盲、III 期、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Mar;13(3):247-55. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70063-3. Epub 2012 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Pleural mesothelioma.胸膜间皮瘤
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Aug 7;11(1):56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00640-3.
2
[Recent Advances in Medical Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma].[恶性胸膜间皮瘤的医学治疗新进展]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2025 May 20;28(5):391-399. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2025.102.18.
3
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy in Unresectable Pleural Mesothelioma: Overview of Efficacy, Safety, and Future Outlook.肿瘤电场(TTFields)疗法治疗不可切除的胸膜间皮瘤:疗效、安全性及未来展望概述
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2025 May;26(5):398-414. doi: 10.1007/s11864-025-01320-w. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
4
Follow-up after first-Line nivOlumab plus ipilimumab in patients with diffuse pleuRal mesotheliomA: a real-world Dutch cohort study-FLORA.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗弥漫性胸膜间皮瘤患者后的随访:一项荷兰真实世界队列研究——FLORA
ESMO Open. 2025 Feb;10(2):104123. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104123. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
5
Newest therapeutic strategies impacting on rarest thoracic malignancies: The clinical case report of biphasic pleural mesothelioma.影响最罕见胸部恶性肿瘤的最新治疗策略:双向性胸膜间皮瘤的临床病例报告
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 14;10(16):e36306. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36306. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
6
Targeted Therapy in Mesotheliomas: Uphill All the Way.间皮瘤的靶向治疗:一路艰难前行。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 22;16(11):1971. doi: 10.3390/cancers16111971.
7
Evaluating niraparib versus active symptom control in patients with previously treated mesothelioma (NERO): a study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, two-arm, open-label phase II trial in UK secondary care centres.评估尼拉帕利对比积极症状控制用于既往治疗的间皮瘤患者(NERO):一项在英国二级保健中心进行的多中心、随机、两臂、开放标签的 II 期试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 22;13(11):e073120. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073120.
8
Updates in Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤治疗的新进展
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Dec;24(12):1758-1789. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01148-2. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
9
Pleural Mesothelioma in the Era of Immunotherapy.免疫治疗时代的胸膜间皮瘤
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Jul 20;17:11795549231178173. doi: 10.1177/11795549231178173. eCollection 2023.
10
Improvements in Systemic Therapies for Advanced Malignant Mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤系统治疗的进展。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 21;24(13):10415. doi: 10.3390/ijms241310415.