• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西红蜂胶对艰难梭菌浮游和生物膜形式的抑制作用。

Inhibitory effect of Brazilian red propolis on planktonic and biofilm forms of Clostridioides difficile.

机构信息

Group of Applied Medical Microbiology - GrAMM, Postgraduate Program in Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil; Biomedicine School, Christus University, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil; Department of Morphology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

Group of Applied Medical Microbiology - GrAMM, Postgraduate Program in Medical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.

出版信息

Anaerobe. 2021 Jun;69:102322. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102322. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102322
PMID:33515722
Abstract

Clostridioides difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming, anaerobic bacillus which is the leading cause of health-care-associated infective diarrhea. The rising incidence of antibiotic resistance in pathogens such as C. difficile makes researches on alternative antibacterial products very important, especially those exploring natural products like propolis. Brazilian Red Propolis, found in the Northeast region of Brazil, is composed by products from regional plants that have the antimicrobial properties. This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of Brazilian Red Propolis (BRP) against C. difficile strains in planktonic and biofilm forms. The susceptibility of four strains of C. difficile to BRP was analyzed by broth microdilution method and vancomycin was included as control drug. BRP-exposed C. difficile cells were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Then, the effects of BRP on growing and mature C. difficile biofilms were also evaluated. BRP minimum inhibitory concentration was 625 μg/mL against all tested strains, while vancomycin MIC range was 0.5-2 μg/mL. SEM showed the loss of homogeneity in bacterial cell wall and cell fragmentation, after BRP-exposure. BRP, at MIC, reduced (P < 0.05) the biomass, matrix proteins and matrix carbohydrates of growing biofilms, and, at 8xMIC, reduced (P < 0.05) the biomass and matrix proteins of mature biofilms. The present study demonstrated that BRP inhibits planktonic growth, damages cell wall, decreases biofilm growth and harms mature biofilms of C. difficile.

摘要

艰难梭菌是一种革兰氏阳性、产芽孢、厌氧杆菌,是导致医疗保健相关感染性腹泻的主要原因。由于病原体如艰难梭菌对抗生素的耐药性不断上升,因此对替代抗菌产品的研究非常重要,特别是那些探索天然产物如蜂胶的研究。巴西红蜂胶存在于巴西东北部地区,由具有抗菌特性的当地植物产品组成。本研究旨在评估巴西红蜂胶(BRP)对浮游和生物膜形式艰难梭菌菌株的体外活性。采用肉汤微量稀释法分析了 4 株艰难梭菌对 BRP 的敏感性,并将万古霉素作为对照药物。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估 BRP 暴露后的艰难梭菌细胞。然后,还评估了 BRP 对生长中和成熟的艰难梭菌生物膜的影响。BRP 对所有测试菌株的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)为 625μg/mL,而万古霉素的 MIC 范围为 0.5-2μg/mL。SEM 显示,BRP 暴露后细菌细胞壁失去均匀性,出现细胞碎片化。BRP 在 MIC 时减少了生长生物膜的生物量、基质蛋白和基质碳水化合物(P<0.05),在 8xMIC 时减少了成熟生物膜的生物量和基质蛋白(P<0.05)。本研究表明,BRP 可抑制浮游生长、破坏细胞壁、减少生物膜生长并损害艰难梭菌的成熟生物膜。

相似文献

1
Inhibitory effect of Brazilian red propolis on planktonic and biofilm forms of Clostridioides difficile.巴西红蜂胶对艰难梭菌浮游和生物膜形式的抑制作用。
Anaerobe. 2021 Jun;69:102322. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2021.102322. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
2
The effect of berberine chloride and/or its combination with vancomycin on the growth, biofilm formation, and motility of Clostridioides difficile.盐酸小檗碱及其与万古霉素联合应用对艰难梭菌生长、生物膜形成和运动性的影响。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;39(7):1391-1399. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03857-0. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Analysis of Clostridium difficile biofilms: imaging and antimicrobial treatment.艰难梭菌生物膜分析:成像与抗菌治疗。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jan 1;73(1):102-108. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx353.
4
High sporulation and overexpression of virulence factors in biofilms and reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and linezolid in recurrent Clostridium [Clostridioides] difficile infection isolates.生物膜中高孢子形成和毒力因子过度表达,以及复发艰难梭菌(梭状芽胞杆菌)感染分离株对万古霉素和利奈唑胺的敏感性降低。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 31;14(7):e0220671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220671. eCollection 2019.
5
Multiple factors modulate biofilm formation by the anaerobic pathogen Clostridium difficile.多种因素调节厌氧病原体艰难梭菌的生物膜形成。
J Bacteriol. 2013 Feb;195(3):545-55. doi: 10.1128/JB.01980-12. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
6
Inhibitory effect of fidaxomicin on biofilm formation in Clostridioides difficile. fidaxomicin 对艰难梭菌生物膜形成的抑制作用。
J Infect Chemother. 2020 Jul;26(7):685-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
7
Brazilian red propolis reduces orange-complex periodontopathogens growing in multispecies biofilms.巴西红蜂胶可减少多物种生物膜中生长的橙色复合体牙周致病菌。
Biofouling. 2019 Mar;35(3):308-319. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2019.1598976. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
8
Development and validation of a chemostat gut model to study both planktonic and biofilm modes of growth of Clostridium difficile and human microbiota.用于研究艰难梭菌和人类微生物群浮游生长模式及生物膜生长模式的恒化器肠道模型的开发与验证
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 6;9(2):e88396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088396. eCollection 2014.
9
Repurposing a platelet aggregation inhibitor ticagrelor as an antimicrobial against Clostridioides difficile.将血小板聚集抑制剂替卡格雷重新用作抗艰难梭菌的抗菌药物。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6497. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63199-x.
10
Clostridioides difficile Biofilm.艰难梭菌生物膜。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1435:249-272. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42108-2_12.

引用本文的文献

1
Advancements in Antimicrobial Surface Coatings Using Metal/Metaloxide Nanoparticles, Antibiotics, and Phytochemicals.使用金属/金属氧化物纳米颗粒、抗生素和植物化学物质的抗菌表面涂层的进展
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;15(13):1023. doi: 10.3390/nano15131023.
2
Clostridioides difficile Biofilm.艰难梭菌生物膜。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1435:249-272. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42108-2_12.
3
Comparative biofilm-forming ability between strains isolated in Latin America and the epidemic NAP1/027 strain.拉丁美洲分离株与流行 NAP1/027 株的生物膜形成能力比较。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Dec 1;12:1033698. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1033698. eCollection 2022.