Formosa Marika, Ebejer Stephen J
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
SAGE Open Nurs. 2024 Oct 29;10:23779608241292839. doi: 10.1177/23779608241292839. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a frequent postoperative complication that nurses commonly need to provide asepsis-specific meticulous care for. The application of a closed-incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) device is regarded as a novel technique that aims to lower the risk of external wound contamination.
The purpose of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of iNPWT on high-risk closed laparotomy incisions with the aim to inform nursing practitioners and physicians engaged in multieffort wound care practices. Nursing professionals play a crucial role in mitigating the incidence of SSIs, from the time of application, through ongoing assessment tissue condition, and ensuring asepsis, thereby enhancing patient care and safety.
Is prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy effective in reducing the incidence of (closed) surgical site wound infections postlaparotomy?
The population studied included patients undergoing laparotomy surgery. The intervention under review included the application of iNPWT, compared to the use of standard gauze dressing. The expected outcome was SSI reduction.
A systematized literature search was conducted using various databases to identify published studies that address the PICO question. The PRISMA checklist and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tools allowed to exclude irrelevant articles and to critically appraise the evidence, respectively. Eleven key articles were retrieved including four RCTs and seven systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The results indicated an overall positive association between iNPWT and a reduction in SSI in laparotomy surgeries when compared to standard dressings.
Data across most studies reviewed support the benefits with the use of iNPWT as a preventive strategy to lower the rates of SSI, with some claiming no difference. Although heterogeneity in the studies precludes a definite conclusion, nurses may make a more informed decision when navigating the demands of SSI prevention targeted nursing care.
手术部位感染(SSIs)是一种常见的术后并发症,护士通常需要针对无菌操作提供细致的护理。闭合切口负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)装置的应用被视为一种旨在降低外部伤口污染风险的新技术。
本综述的目的是评估iNPWT对高风险闭合性剖腹手术切口的有效性,以便为参与多方面伤口护理实践的护理人员和医生提供信息。从应用之时起,通过持续评估组织状况并确保无菌操作,护理专业人员在降低SSIs发生率方面发挥着关键作用,从而提高患者护理质量和安全性。
预防性负压伤口治疗对降低剖腹手术后(闭合性)手术部位伤口感染的发生率是否有效?
PICO要素:研究人群包括接受剖腹手术的患者。所审查的干预措施包括应用iNPWT,并与使用标准纱布敷料进行比较。预期结果是减少手术部位感染。
使用各种数据库进行了系统的文献检索,以识别针对PICO问题的已发表研究。PRISMA清单和批判性评估技能计划工具分别用于排除不相关的文章并对证据进行批判性评估。检索到11篇关键文章,包括4项随机对照试验以及7项系统评价和荟萃分析。结果表明,与标准敷料相比,iNPWT与剖腹手术中手术部位感染的减少总体呈正相关。
大多数综述研究的数据支持将iNPWT作为降低手术部位感染率的预防策略的益处,也有一些研究称没有差异。尽管研究中的异质性排除了得出明确结论的可能性,但护士在应对预防手术部位感染的针对性护理需求时可能会做出更明智的决定。