Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 2210, Chicago, IL 60611, United States; Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., Suite 2210, Chicago, IL 60611, United States.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Apr;30(4):105632. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105632. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
The "weekend effect" has been shown to affect outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. We sought to compare metrics and outcomes of emergent stroke thrombectomy at three affiliated comprehensive stroke centers on weekdays versus nights/weekends for a three-year period beginning in 2015, when thrombectomy became common practice for large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke.
We performed a retrospective analysis of all stroke thrombectomy patients treated from 2015 to 2018 to compare standard thrombectomy metrics and outcomes in patients presenting during weekdays or nights/weekends.
Two hundred-sixteen mechanical thrombectomy cases were evaluated, with 50.9% of patients presenting on weekdays and 49.1% presenting on nights/weekends. There were no statistical differences in baseline characteristics in demographics, stroke risk factors, or stroke severity, but patients presenting on nights/weekends had longer times from last known normal to presentation (130 versus 72.5 minutes, p=0.03). Door-to-groin times were delayed in patients presenting on nights/weekends compared to weekdays (median 104.5 versus 86 minutes, respectively; p=0.007) but groin-to-reperfusion times were similar (51.5 versus 48 minutes, respectively; p=0.4). Successful reperfusion was similar in both groups (90.6% nights/weekends versus 90% weekdays; p=1.0) as were the incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (10.4% nights/weekend versus 7.3% weekdays; p=0.48) and 90-day good functional outcomes based on the modified Rankin Scale did not differ between the two groups in a shift analysis (p=0.545).
Despite delays in door-to-groin puncture times in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting on nights/weekends compared to weekdays, we did not identify significant differences in successful reperfusion or functional outcomes in this cohort. Further studies are warranted to continue to evaluate differences in stroke care on nights/weekends versus weekdays.
“周末效应”已被证明会影响急性缺血性脑卒中的结果。我们旨在比较 2015 年开始广泛应用血管内取栓术治疗大血管闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中以来,在 3 家综合卒中中心的 3 年期间,工作日与夜间/周末紧急进行卒中取栓术的各项指标和结果。
我们对 2015 年至 2018 年期间接受机械取栓术的所有卒中患者进行了回顾性分析,比较了在工作日或夜间/周末就诊的患者的标准取栓术指标和结果。
共评估了 216 例机械取栓术病例,其中 50.9%的患者在工作日就诊,49.1%的患者在夜间/周末就诊。在人口统计学、卒中危险因素或卒中严重程度方面,两组患者的基线特征无统计学差异,但夜间/周末就诊的患者从最后一次正常到就诊的时间较长(130 分钟比 72.5 分钟,p=0.03)。与工作日相比,夜间/周末就诊的患者门到股动脉时间延迟(中位数分别为 104.5 分钟和 86 分钟,p=0.007),但股动脉到再灌注时间相似(51.5 分钟和 48 分钟,p=0.4)。两组患者的再灌注成功率相似(90.6%的夜间/周末组与 90%的工作日组;p=1.0),症状性颅内出血发生率也相似(夜间/周末组 10.4%,工作日组 7.3%;p=0.48),基于改良 Rankin 量表的 90 天良好功能结局在移位分析中两组间无差异(p=0.545)。
尽管夜间/周末就诊的急性缺血性脑卒中患者门到股动脉穿刺时间延迟,但在本队列中,我们并未发现再灌注成功或功能结局有显著差异。需要进一步研究以继续评估夜间/周末与工作日的卒中护理差异。