Left ventricular strain for predicting the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: two methods for one question.

AIMS

Myocardial work (manually controlled software) and integral-derived longitudinal strain (automatic quantification of strain curves) are two promising tools to quantify dyssynchrony and potentially select the patients that are most likely to have a reverse remodelling due to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We sought to test and compare the value of these two methods in the prediction of CRT-response.

MATERIALS AND RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three patients undergoing CRT-implantation from three European referral centres were considered. The characteristics from the six-segment of the four-chamber view were computed to obtain regional myocardial work and the automatically generated integrals of strain. The characteristics were studied in mono-parametric and multiparametric evaluations to predict CRT-induced 6-month reverse remodelling. For each characteristic, the performance to estimate the CRT response was determined with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the difference between the performances was statistically evaluated. The best area under the curve (AUC) when only one characteristic used was obtained for a myocardial work (AUC = 0.73) and the ROC curve was significantly better than the others. The best AUC for the integrals was 0.63, and the ROC curve was not significantly greater than the others. However, with the best combination of works and integrals, the ROC curves were not significantly different and the AUCs were 0.77 and 0.72.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial work used in a mono-parametric estimation of the CRT-response has better performance compared to other methods. However, in a multiparametric application such as what could be done in a machine-learning approach, the two methods provide similar results.