• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结果:一项大型单中心经验。

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large Single-Centre Experience.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Coronary Heart Disease Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Catheterization Laboratories, Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:8829686. doi: 10.1155/2021/8829686. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/8829686
PMID:33519307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7815387/
Abstract

AIMS

This study sought to report the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients who underwent unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large centre.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 913 consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM PCI from January 2004 to December 2008 at Fu Wai Hospital were retrospectively analysed; the mean age was 60.0 ± 10.9 years, females accounted for 22% of patients, diabetes was present in 27.7% of patients, and an LM bifurcation lesion occurred in 82.9% of patients. During the median follow-up of 9.7 years, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) occurred in 25.6% (234) of patients, and the rates of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 14.9%, 11.0%, and 7.1%, respectively. Cardiac death occurred in only 7.9% of patients. The estimated event rate was 41.9% for death/myocardial infarction/any revascularization and 45.9% for death/MI/stroke/any revascularization. Definite/probable stent thrombosis occurred in 4.3% (39) of patients. According to the subgroup analysis, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with less long-term MACCEs. Further multivariate analysis identified that age and LVEF<40% were the only independent predictors for 10-year death. Age, LVEF<40%, creatinine clearance, and incomplete revascularization were independent predictors for death/MI, while a two-stent strategy, diabetes, a transradial approach, and the use of bare metal stents (BMSs) or first-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Unprotected LM PCI in a large cohort of consecutive patients in a single large centre demonstrated favourable long-term outcomes up to 10 years even with the use of BMSs and first-generation of DESs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在报告在一个大型中心接受非保护左主干(LM)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者的 10 年临床结果。

方法和结果

回顾性分析 2004 年 1 月至 2008 年 12 月期间在阜外医院接受非保护 LM PCI 的 913 例连续患者;平均年龄为 60.0±10.9 岁,女性占患者的 22%,27.7%的患者患有糖尿病,82.9%的患者发生 LM 分叉病变。在中位随访 9.7 年期间,25.6%(234 例)的患者发生主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs),全因死亡、心肌梗死和卒中年发生率分别为 14.9%、11.0%和 7.1%。仅 7.9%的患者发生心脏性死亡。死亡/心肌梗死/任何血运重建的估计事件发生率为 41.9%,死亡/心肌梗死/卒中和任何血运重建的发生率为 45.9%。确定/可能的支架血栓形成发生率为 4.3%(39 例)。根据亚组分析,血管内超声指导的 PCI 与较低的长期 MACCEs 相关。进一步的多变量分析确定,年龄和 LVEF<40%是 10 年死亡的唯一独立预测因素。年龄、LVEF<40%、肌酐清除率和不完全血运重建是死亡/心肌梗死的独立预测因素,而双支架策略、糖尿病、经桡动脉入路以及使用裸金属支架(BMS)或第一代药物洗脱支架(DES)不是。

结论

在一个大型中心的连续患者的大型队列中进行非保护 LM PCI 甚至使用 BMS 和第一代 DES 也能在 10 年内获得良好的长期结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/3f475408b320/JITC2021-8829686.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/23f6f77c76aa/JITC2021-8829686.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/8c093e1e8fd3/JITC2021-8829686.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/4084e9363ef8/JITC2021-8829686.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/3f475408b320/JITC2021-8829686.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/23f6f77c76aa/JITC2021-8829686.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/8c093e1e8fd3/JITC2021-8829686.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/4084e9363ef8/JITC2021-8829686.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8b9/7815387/3f475408b320/JITC2021-8829686.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large Single-Centre Experience.无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期临床结果:一项大型单中心经验。
J Interv Cardiol. 2021 Jan 12;2021:8829686. doi: 10.1155/2021/8829686. eCollection 2021.
2
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
3
Long-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for ostial/mid-shaft lesions versus distal bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery: the DELTA Registry (drug-eluting stent for left main coronary artery disease): a multicenter registry evaluating percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main treatment.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗开口/中段病变与无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期临床结局:DELTA 注册研究(左主干冠状动脉疾病药物洗脱支架):一项多中心注册研究,评估经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干的疗效。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1242-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.005.
4
Three-Year Major Clinical Outcomes of Angiography-Guided Single Stenting Technique in Non-Complex Left Main Coronary Artery Diseases.血管造影引导下单支架置入技术治疗非复杂性左主干冠状动脉疾病的三年主要临床结局
Int Heart J. 2017 Oct 12;58(5):704-713. doi: 10.1536/ihj.17-115. Epub 2017 Sep 30.
5
Long-Term Outcomes of Different Two-Stent Techniques With Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Bifurcation Disease: Insights From the FAILS-2 Study.第二代药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干分叉病变不同双支架技术的长期预后:来自FAILS-2研究的见解
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Aug;30(8):276-281.
6
Impact of Operator Experience and Volume on Outcomes After Left Main Coronary Artery Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.术者经验和手术量对左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 24;9(20):2086-2093. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.08.011.
7
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
8
Impact of 3-dimensional bifurcation angle on 5-year outcome of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main coronary artery disease: a substudy of the SYNTAX trial (synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery).三维分叉角度对左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 5 年预后的影响:SYNTAX 试验(紫杉醇药物洗脱支架与心脏搭桥术的联合治疗)的一项亚组研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.009.
9
Impact of coronary anatomy and stenting technique on long-term outcome after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease.药物洗脱支架置入治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病后,冠状动脉解剖结构和支架技术对长期预后的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan;7(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
10
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk of Adverse Events in relation to High Bleeding Risk among Patients Receiving Drug-Eluting Stents: Insights from a Large Single-Center Cohort Study.药物洗脱支架置入患者中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的复杂性及与高出血风险相关的不良事件风险:一项大型单中心队列研究的见解
J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Apr 25;2020:2985435. doi: 10.1155/2020/2985435. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term Follow-up Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Unprotected Left Main.无保护左主干原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期随访光学相干断层扫描评估
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 19;25(12):445. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512445. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Single versus Double Stenting in NSTEMI Patients with Complex Left Main Bifurcation Disease.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并复杂左主干分叉病变患者的单支架与双支架置入术对比
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 20;11(12):3559. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123559.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term (10-year) outcomes of stenting or bypass surgery for acute coronary syndromes and stable ischemic heart disease with unprotected left main coronary artery disease.无保护左主干病变的急性冠状动脉综合征和稳定型缺血性心脏病患者行支架置入术或旁路手术的 10 年长期结局。
Am Heart J. 2019 Dec;218:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.014. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
2
Five-Year Outcomes after PCI or CABG for Left Main Coronary Disease.左主干冠状动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术后 5 年的结果。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 7;381(19):1820-1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
3
Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗三血管病变或左主干病变患者:多中心随机对照 SYNTAX 试验 10 年随访结果。
Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1325-1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention for obstructive bifurcation lesions: the 14th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗阻塞性分叉病变:来自欧洲分叉俱乐部的第 14 份共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2019 May 20;15(1):90-98. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00144.
5
Impact of unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term clinical outcomes: a large single-center study.无保护左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对长期临床结局的影响:一项大型单中心研究。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jun;30(4):249-254. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000725.
6
Long-term clinical outcomes after a percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease excluded from clinical trials.在临床试验排除的无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者中,使用药物洗脱支架进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期临床结局。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Jun;30(4):239-248. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000718.
7
Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病:欧洲分叉俱乐部第 13 次共识文件。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):112-120. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00357.
8
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
9
Meta-Analysis of Comparison of 5-Year Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery in the Era of Drug-eluting Stents.药物洗脱支架时代无保护左主干冠状动脉患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术5年结局比较的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1514-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.048. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
10
Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干血运重建:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):173-182. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx008.