• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Information on antibiotics in an Indonesian hospital outpatient setting: What is provided by pharmacy staff and recalled by patients?印度尼西亚一家医院门诊环境中抗生素的信息:药房工作人员提供了哪些信息,患者又回忆起了哪些信息?
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2167. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2167. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
2
The provision of advice by pharmacy staff in eastern Indonesian community pharmacies.印度尼西亚东部社区药房中药剂师提供的建议。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1452. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.2.1452. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
The impact of face-to-face educational outreach on diarrhoea treatment in pharmacies.面对面教育推广对药店腹泻治疗的影响。
Health Policy Plan. 1996 Sep;11(3):308-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/11.3.308.
4
Factors influencing the current practice of self-medication consultations in Eastern Indonesian community pharmacies: a qualitative study.影响印度尼西亚东部社区药房自我药疗咨询现状的因素:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 May 13;16:179. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1425-3.
5
A cross-sectional national survey of community pharmacy staff: Knowledge and antibiotic provision.横断面全国社区药房员工调查:知识与抗生素供应
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 25;14(4):e0215484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215484. eCollection 2019.
6
Information-gathering for self-medication via Eastern Indonesian community pharmacies: a cross-sectional study.印度尼西亚东部社区药房自我药疗的信息收集:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:8. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0670-6.
7
Evaluation of community pharmacy-based services for type-2 diabetes in an Indonesian setting: pharmacist survey.印度尼西亚社区药房2型糖尿病服务评估:药剂师调查
Int J Clin Pharm. 2015 Oct;37(5):873-82. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0135-y. Epub 2015 May 19.
8
Qualitative study using interviews and focus groups to explore the current and potential for antimicrobial stewardship in community pharmacy informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.采用访谈和焦点小组的定性研究,根据理论领域框架探索社区药剂师在当前和潜在的抗菌药物管理中的作用。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 28;8(12):e025101. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025101.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
10
Perspectives of pharmacy staff on dispensing subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics: a theory informed qualitative study.药剂人员对分发低于治疗剂量抗生素的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Oct;39(5):1110-1118. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0510-y. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding of Medication Information in Primary Health Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in a South Eastern European Population.东南欧人群初级卫生保健中药物信息的理解:一项横断面研究
Front Public Health. 2020 Aug 11;8:388. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00388. eCollection 2020.
2
Optimal antimicrobial duration for common bacterial infections.常见细菌感染的最佳抗菌疗程
Aust Prescr. 2019 Feb;42(1):5-9. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2019.001. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
3
Development and validation of a scale to measure the quality of patient medication counseling using Rasch model.使用拉施模型开发和验证用于衡量患者用药咨询质量的量表。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Oct-Dec;16(4):1327. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.04.1327. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
4
Universal health coverage in Indonesia: concept, progress, and challenges.印度尼西亚的全民健康覆盖:概念、进展和挑战。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):75-102. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31647-7. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
How to meet patients' individual needs for drug information - a scoping review.如何满足患者对药物信息的个性化需求——一项范围综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Nov 6;12:2339-2355. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S173651. eCollection 2018.
6
Source of medicines and medicine information by self-reported persons living with hypertension and diabetes in rural and urban Ghana.加纳城乡地区高血压和糖尿病患者自述的药品及药品信息来源
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):1151. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.03.1151. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
Variation in antibiotic use among and within different settings: a systematic review.不同环境下及环境内抗生素使用的差异:一项系统评价。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jun 1;73(suppl_6):vi17-vi29. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky115.
8
Antibiotic Expenditures by Medication, Class, and Healthcare Setting in the United States, 2010-2015.美国 2010-2015 年按药物、类别和医疗保健机构划分的抗生素支出情况。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jan 6;66(2):185-190. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix773.
9
Antibacterials dispensed in the community comprise 85%-95% of total human antibacterial consumption.社区配发的抗菌药物占人类抗菌药物总消费量的85%-95%。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Feb;43(1):59-64. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12610. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
10
Assessment of attitudes and practices of young Malaysian adults about antibiotics use: a cross-sectional study.马来西亚年轻成年人对抗生素使用的态度和行为评估:一项横断面研究。
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):929. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.929. Epub 2017 Jun 30.

印度尼西亚一家医院门诊环境中抗生素的信息:药房工作人员提供了哪些信息,患者又回忆起了哪些信息?

Information on antibiotics in an Indonesian hospital outpatient setting: What is provided by pharmacy staff and recalled by patients?

作者信息

Naurita Melani, Wibowo Yosi I, Setiadi Adji P, Setiawan Eko, Halim Steven V, Sunderland Bruce

机构信息

BSc. Pharm. Master Student, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya . Surabaya ( Indonesia ).

PhD. Senior Lecturer. Centre for Medicines Information and Pharmaceutical Care (CMIPC), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Surabaya . Surabaya ( Indonesia ).

出版信息

Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021 Jan-Mar;19(1):2167. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2167. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

DOI:10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2167
PMID:33520037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7819704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The provision of information by pharmacy staff is a key factor to ensure patients' understanding and quality use of medications, including antibiotics. However, little is known regarding the transmission of information between pharmacy staff and patients in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify information on antibiotics provided by pharmacy staff and recalled by patients in an Indonesian outpatient setting.

METHODS

The study was conducted in a hospital outpatient clinic in Malang, Indonesia, in 2019. A checklist was used to obtain the data on information provided by pharmacy staff, while interviews were conducted to determine information recalled by patients (only presenting patients were included); a total of 15 information items - i.e. 14 essential and one secondary - were observed. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise data on the checklists ('given' versus 'not given') as well as responses from the interviews ('recalled' versus 'missed').

RESULTS

Eleven pharmacy staff (two pharmacists and nine pharmacy technicians) were involved in providing information for patients obtaining oral antibiotics during the study period. Of 14 essential information items, only about half was given by pharmacy staff, with pharmacists significantly providing on average more information items than pharmacy technicians (7.96 versus 7.67 respectively; p<0.001). The most frequently information items provided (>90%) included "antibiotic identification", "indication", administration directions (i.e. "dosage", "frequency", "hour of administration", "administration before/after meal", "route of administration"), and "duration of use". A total of 230 patients consented to the study, giving 79.9% response rate. The average number of information items recalled by patients was 7.09 (SD 1.45). Almost all patients could recall information on administration directions [i.e. "route of administration" (97.0%), "frequency" (95.2%), "dosage" (92.6%), "hour of administration" (85.7%), "administration before/after meal" (89.1%)] and "duration of use" (90.9%). Fewer patients were able to recall "antibiotic identification" (76.5%) and "indication" (77.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacy staff provided antibiotic information in a limited fashion, while patients showed adequate ability to recall the information given to them. Further study is needed to better understand the effective process of information transmission between pharmacy staff and patients, especially if more information was provided, to better optimise the use of antibiotics in outpatient settings in Indonesia.

摘要

背景

药房工作人员提供信息是确保患者理解并合理使用药物(包括抗生素)的关键因素。然而,关于印度尼西亚药房工作人员与患者之间信息传递的情况却知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在确定印度尼西亚门诊环境下药房工作人员提供的以及患者回忆起的抗生素相关信息。

方法

该研究于2019年在印度尼西亚玛琅的一家医院门诊进行。使用一份清单来获取药房工作人员提供的信息数据,同时进行访谈以确定患者回忆起的信息(仅纳入前来就诊的患者);共观察了15项信息内容,即14项基本信息和1项次要信息。采用描述性分析来总结清单上的数据(“已提供”与“未提供”)以及访谈的回复(“回忆起”与“遗漏”)。

结果

在研究期间,11名药房工作人员(2名药剂师和9名药房技术员)参与为获取口服抗生素的患者提供信息。在14项基本信息中,药房工作人员仅提供了约一半,药剂师平均提供的信息内容显著多于药房技术员(分别为7.96项和7.67项;p<0.001)。提供频率最高(>90%)的信息内容包括“抗生素识别”“适应症”、给药说明(即“剂量”“频率”“给药时间”“饭前/饭后给药”“给药途径”)以及“使用时长”。共有230名患者同意参与研究,回复率为79.9%。患者回忆起的信息内容平均数量为7.09项(标准差1.45)。几乎所有患者都能回忆起给药说明[即“给药途径”(97.0%)、“频率”(95.2%)、“剂量”(92.6%)、“给药时间”(85.7%)、“饭前/饭后给药”(89.1%)]以及“使用时长”(90.9%)。能回忆起“抗生素识别”(76.5%)和“适应症”(77.0%)的患者较少。

结论

药房工作人员提供抗生素信息的方式有限,而患者表现出了足够的能力来回忆所提供给他们的信息。需要进一步开展研究,以更好地了解药房工作人员与患者之间信息传递的有效过程,特别是在提供了更多信息的情况下,以便更好地优化印度尼西亚门诊环境中抗生素的使用。