Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ, USA.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2022 Feb;66(2-3):209-226. doi: 10.1177/0306624X21990811. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Inmate misconduct continues to threaten safety and order within correctional institutions. Yet few studies have examined its longitudinal nature. In this paper we explore the correspondence between correctional programming and inmate misconduct. To do this, we draw from Linning et al.'s time-course framework devised to improve the design and evaluation of interventions by considering effects that can occur before, during, and after programming. We provide the first empirical demonstration of their framework using prisoner misconduct data collected from all Ohio prisons between January 2008 and June 2012. A cross-lagged panel analysis provides support for the use of a time-course framework. Results show that misconduct decreased during programming. However, we observed increases in misconduct prior to and following exposure to programming. Our results suggest that future work needs to improve our understanding of causal mechanisms of inmate misconduct and when their effects are expected.
在押人员的不当行为继续威胁着监管机构的安全和秩序。然而,很少有研究探讨其纵向性质。在本文中,我们探讨了矫正计划与在押人员不当行为之间的一致性。为此,我们借鉴了 Linning 等人制定的时间序列框架,该框架旨在通过考虑计划之前、期间和之后可能发生的影响,来改进干预措施的设计和评估。我们首次使用 2008 年 1 月至 2012 年 6 月期间从俄亥俄州所有监狱收集的囚犯不当行为数据,对其框架进行了实证验证。交叉滞后面板分析为使用时间序列框架提供了支持。结果表明,在计划期间不当行为减少了。但是,我们观察到在接触矫正计划之前和之后,不当行为有所增加。我们的研究结果表明,未来的工作需要增进对在押人员不当行为的因果机制及其预期效果的理解。