• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测洛锡安出生队列 1936 年轻度认知障碍的稳定性、进展或逆转的因素。

Predictors of Mild Cognitive Impairment Stability, Progression, or Reversion in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.

机构信息

Lothian Birth Cohorts, School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):225-232. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201282.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-201282
PMID:33523010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8075399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) describes a borderland between healthy cognition and dementia. Progression to and reversion from MCI is relatively common but more research is required to understand the factors affecting this fluidity and improve clinical care interventions.

OBJECTIVE

We explore these transitions in MCI status and their predictive factors over a six-year period in a highly-phenotyped longitudinal study, the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.

METHODS

MCI status was derived in the LBC1936 at ages 76 (n = 567) and 82 years (n = 341) using NIA-AA diagnostic guidelines. Progressions and reversions between healthy cognition and MCI over the follow-up period were assessed. Multinomial logistic regression assessed the effect of various predictors on the likelihood of progressing, reverting, or maintaining cognitive status.

RESULTS

Of the 292 participants who completed both time points, 41 (14%) participants had MCI at T1 and 56 (19%) at T2. Over the follow-up period, 74%remained cognitively healthy, 12%transitioned to MCI, 7%reverted to healthy cognition, and 7%maintained their baseline MCI status. Findings indicated that membership of these transition groups was affected by age, cardiovascular disease, and number of depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Findings that higher baseline depressive symptoms increase the likelihood of reverting from MCI to healthy cognition indicate that there may be an important role for the treatment of depression for those with MCI. However, further research is required to identify prevention strategies for those at high risk of MCI and inform effective interventions that increase the likelihood of reversion to, and maintenance of healthy cognition.

摘要

背景

轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 描述了健康认知与痴呆之间的交界地带。从 MCI 进展到恢复以及从 MCI 恢复到正常认知是相对常见的,但需要更多的研究来了解影响这种流动性的因素,并改善临床护理干预措施。

目的

我们在一项高度表型的纵向研究——洛锡安出生队列 1936 中,探索了 MCI 状态的这些转变及其在六年期间的预测因素。

方法

在 LBC1936 中,使用 NIA-AA 诊断标准,在 76 岁(n=567)和 82 岁(n=341)时确定 MCI 状态。在随访期间评估认知健康与 MCI 之间的进展和恢复情况。多项逻辑回归评估了各种预测因素对进展、恢复或维持认知状态的可能性的影响。

结果

在完成两次时间点的 292 名参与者中,41 名(14%)参与者在 T1 时有 MCI,56 名(19%)参与者在 T2 时有 MCI。在随访期间,74%的参与者保持认知健康,12%的参与者转变为 MCI,7%的参与者恢复到健康认知,7%的参与者维持其基线 MCI 状态。研究结果表明,这些转变组的成员资格受到年龄、心血管疾病和抑郁症状数量的影响。

结论

研究结果表明,较高的基线抑郁症状增加了从 MCI 恢复到认知健康的可能性,这表明对于 MCI 患者,治疗抑郁可能具有重要作用。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定对 MCI 高危人群的预防策略,并为增加恢复到健康认知和维持健康认知的可能性提供有效的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cd/8075399/46b51cd423e2/jad-80-jad201282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cd/8075399/42e5c2a1948f/jad-80-jad201282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cd/8075399/46b51cd423e2/jad-80-jad201282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cd/8075399/42e5c2a1948f/jad-80-jad201282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7cd/8075399/46b51cd423e2/jad-80-jad201282-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of Mild Cognitive Impairment Stability, Progression, or Reversion in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.预测洛锡安出生队列 1936 年轻度认知障碍的稳定性、进展或逆转的因素。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;80(1):225-232. doi: 10.3233/JAD-201282.
2
Diagnostic Stability of Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Predictors of Reversion to Normal Cognitive Functioning.轻度认知障碍的诊断稳定性,以及向正常认知功能恢复的预测因素。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;48(5-6):317-329. doi: 10.1159/000506255. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
3
Predictors of Reversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Normal Cognition.从轻度认知障碍恢复到正常认知的预测因素
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2017;43(3-4):204-214. doi: 10.1159/000456070. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
4
Reversible predictors of reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognition: a 4-year longitudinal study.从轻度认知障碍恢复正常认知的可逆预测因素:一项为期 4 年的纵向研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Mar 13;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0480-5.
5
Estimating Bidirectional Transitions and Identifying Predictors of Mild Cognitive Impairment.评估双向转变并识别轻度认知障碍的预测因素。
Neurology. 2023 Jan 17;100(3):e297-e307. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201386. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Cognitive Reserve and Mild Cognitive Impairment: Predictors and Rates of Reversion to Intact Cognition vs Progression to Dementia.认知储备与轻度认知障碍:向认知完好状态逆转与向痴呆进展的预测指标和比率。
Neurology. 2022 Mar 15;98(11):e1114-e1123. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200051. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal or near-normal cognition: risk factors and prognosis.从轻度认知障碍恢复为正常或接近正常认知:风险因素和预后。
Neurology. 2012 Oct 9;79(15):1591-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e26b7. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
8
Estimating Alzheimer's Disease Progression Rates from Normal Cognition Through Mild Cognitive Impairment and Stages of Dementia.从正常认知到轻度认知障碍及痴呆阶段估算阿尔茨海默病的进展速度。
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2018;15(8):777-788. doi: 10.2174/1567205015666180119092427.
9
Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.1936 年洛锡安出生队列人群轻度认知障碍的流行率。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2021;35(3):230-236. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000433.
10
Comorbid Mild Cognitive Impairment and Depressive Symptoms Predict Future Dementia in Community Older Adults: A 24-Month Follow-Up Longitudinal Study.共病轻度认知障碍和抑郁症状可预测社区老年人未来患痴呆症的风险:一项为期24个月的随访纵向研究。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1473-1482. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160244.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Patterns and Predictors of Cognitive Impairment Classification Stability.认知障碍分类稳定性的纵向模式及预测因素
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 May 21;40(4):802-813. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae107.
2
Cortico-limbic volume abnormalities in late life depression are distinct from β amyloid and white matter pathologies.老年期抑郁症中的皮质-边缘叶体积异常与β淀粉样蛋白和白质病变不同。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Apr;30(4):1267-1276. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02677-4. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
Motoric cognitive risk syndrome trajectories and incident dementia over 10 years.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.1936 年洛锡安出生队列人群轻度认知障碍的流行率。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2021;35(3):230-236. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000433.
2
Inflammation as a risk factor for the development of frailty in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.炎症作为洛锡安出生队列 1936 年发生脆弱的风险因素。
Exp Gerontol. 2020 Oct 1;139:111055. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111055. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Diagnostic Stability of Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Predictors of Reversion to Normal Cognitive Functioning.
运动认知风险综合征轨迹与10年期间的新发痴呆症
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2023 Jul 30;5:100178. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2023.100178. eCollection 2023.
4
Are neuropsychiatric symptoms a marker of small vessel disease progression in older adults? Evidence from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.神经精神症状是否是老年人小血管疾病进展的标志物?来自洛锡安出生队列 1936 年的证据。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;38(1):e5855. doi: 10.1002/gps.5855.
5
Mild Cognitive Impairment, Reversion Rates, and Associated Factors: Comparison of Two Diagnostic Approaches.轻度认知障碍、逆转率及相关因素:两种诊断方法的比较。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;91(2):585-601. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220597.
6
The Power of Birth Cohorts to Study Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment.出生队列在研究认知障碍危险因素中的作用。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Dec;22(12):847-854. doi: 10.1007/s11910-022-01244-0. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
7
Urinary AD7c-NTP Evaluates Cognition Impairment and Differentially Diagnoses AD and MCI.尿 AD7c-NTP 评估认知障碍,并能区分 AD 和 MCI。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2022 Jan-Dec;37:15333175221115247. doi: 10.1177/15333175221115247.
8
Cognitive Test Scores and Progressive Cognitive Decline in the Aberdeen 1921 and 1936 Birth Cohorts.阿伯丁1921年和1936年出生队列中的认知测试分数与渐进性认知衰退
Brain Sci. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):318. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12030318.
轻度认知障碍的诊断稳定性,以及向正常认知功能恢复的预测因素。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;48(5-6):317-329. doi: 10.1159/000506255. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
4
Reversible predictors of reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognition: a 4-year longitudinal study.从轻度认知障碍恢复正常认知的可逆预测因素:一项为期 4 年的纵向研究。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019 Mar 13;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13195-019-0480-5.
5
Frailty as a Predictor of Cognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.衰弱作为认知障碍的预测指标:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Feb 19;6:26. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00026. eCollection 2019.
6
Mild Cognitive Impairment Reversion and Progression: Rates and Predictors in Community-Living Older Persons in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Studies Cohort.轻度认知障碍的逆转与进展:新加坡纵向老龄化研究队列中社区居住老年人的发生率及预测因素
Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2018 Jun 19;8(2):226-237. doi: 10.1159/000488936. eCollection 2018 May-Aug.
7
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and the Diagnostic Stability of Mild Cognitive Impairment.神经精神症状与轻度认知障碍的诊断稳定性。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(4):1841-1855. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170527.
8
Cohort Profile Update: The Lothian Birth Cohorts of 1921 and 1936.队列简介更新:1921年和1936年的洛锡安出生队列。
Int J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug 1;47(4):1042-1042r. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy022.
9
Coronary heart disease and risk for cognitive impairment or dementia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.冠心病与认知障碍或痴呆风险:系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0184244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184244. eCollection 2017.
10
Anxiety and Depression as Longitudinal Predictors of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults.焦虑和抑郁作为老年人轻度认知障碍的纵向预测因素
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 May;62(5):343-350. doi: 10.1177/0706743717699175. Epub 2017 Mar 27.