• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硅酸钙基封闭剂的微观结构与元素表征

Microstructural and Elemental Characterization of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.

作者信息

Radwanski Mateusz, Piwonski Ireneusz, Szmechtyk Tomasz, Sauro Salvatore, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Str., 92-213 Lodz, Poland.

Department of Materials Technology and Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, 163 Pomorska St., 90-236 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 May 18;15(10):756. doi: 10.3390/nano15100756.

DOI:10.3390/nano15100756
PMID:40423146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12114322/
Abstract

Calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBS) vary in chemical composition, which can influence treatment outcomes. Therefore, the study aimed at comparing several commercially available CSBS regarding microstructure and elemental characterization. Four CSBS (AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer, BioRoot RCS, BioRoot Flow, TotalFill BC Sealer) and a control resin-based sealer (AH Plus) were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray powder diffraction analysis (XRD). The specimens were analyzed after setting (SEM, EDX, XRD), as well as after 7 (SEM) and 28 days (SEM, EDX) of incubation in Hank's balanced salt solution. AH Plus exhibited a uniform matrix and small amounts of calcium (Ca), significantly decreasing after incubation. In contrast, CSBSs exhibited crystalline forms on the surface and increased Ca content, significantly increasing after 28 days of incubation. The main crystalline phase for all tested CSBS was zirconium oxide, while for ERBS it was calcium tungstate. In conclusion, the amount of calcium increased on the surface of CSBSs after incubation, which alkalinized the pH, promoting mineralization, apatite formation, and antibacterial potential. Despite this, the formation of a hydroxyapatite layer was not demonstrated, possibly due to the high dissolution potential of CSBSs.

摘要

硅酸钙基封闭剂(CSBS)的化学成分各不相同,这可能会影响治疗效果。因此,本研究旨在比较几种市售CSBS的微观结构和元素特征。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能量色散X射线光谱仪(EDX)和X射线粉末衍射分析(XRD)对四种CSBS(AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂、BioRoot RCS、BioRoot Flow、TotalFill BC封闭剂)和一种对照树脂基封闭剂(AH Plus)进行评估。在固化后(SEM、EDX、XRD)以及在汉克平衡盐溶液中孵育7天(SEM)和28天(SEM、EDX)后对标本进行分析。AH Plus呈现出均匀的基质和少量的钙(Ca),孵育后显著减少。相比之下,CSBS在表面呈现出晶体形式且钙含量增加,孵育28天后显著增加。所有测试的CSBS的主要晶相为氧化锆,而对照树脂基封闭剂的主要晶相为钨酸钙。总之,孵育后CSBS表面的钙含量增加,使pH值碱化,促进矿化、磷灰石形成和抗菌潜力。尽管如此,未证实形成羟基磷灰石层,这可能是由于CSBS的高溶解潜力所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/bb112bb5db86/nanomaterials-15-00756-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/38843871bf6a/nanomaterials-15-00756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/b7f2d378419e/nanomaterials-15-00756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/f6a48cf3da9f/nanomaterials-15-00756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/bb112bb5db86/nanomaterials-15-00756-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/38843871bf6a/nanomaterials-15-00756-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/b7f2d378419e/nanomaterials-15-00756-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/f6a48cf3da9f/nanomaterials-15-00756-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e2f/12114322/bb112bb5db86/nanomaterials-15-00756-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
Microstructural and Elemental Characterization of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.硅酸钙基封闭剂的微观结构与元素表征
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2025 May 18;15(10):756. doi: 10.3390/nano15100756.
2
Physicochemical Changes in Root-Canal Sealers under Thermal Challenge: A Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate- and Epoxy-Resin-Based Sealers.热挑战下根管封闭剂的物理化学变化:硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基封闭剂的对比分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;17(8):1932. doi: 10.3390/ma17081932.
3
Chemical-Physical Properties and Bioactivity of New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers.新型预混硅酸钙-生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化性能及生物活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 11;23(22):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213914.
4
Heating stability, physical and chemical analysis of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的加热稳定性及理化分析。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1175-1188. doi: 10.1111/iej.13496. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Chemical, Antibacterial, and Cytotoxic Properties of Four Different Endodontic Sealer Leachates Over Time.四种不同根管封闭剂浸出液随时间变化的化学、抗菌和细胞毒性特性
J Endod. 2024 Nov;50(11):1612-1621. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.08.015. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
6
The solubility, pH value, chemical structure, radiopacity, and cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers: an in vitro study.四种不同根管封闭剂的溶解度、pH 值、化学结构、射线可透性和细胞毒性:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5413-5425. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05160-6. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
7
Comparison of the antibacterial activity of calcium silicate- and epoxy resin-based endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms: a confocal laser-scanning microscopy analysis.比较硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗菌活性:共聚焦激光扫描显微镜分析。
Odontology. 2019 Oct;107(4):513-520. doi: 10.1007/s10266-019-00425-7. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
8
Properties of Tricalcium Silicate Sealers.硅酸三钙封闭剂的性能
J Endod. 2016 Oct;42(10):1529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
9
Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Various Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers: In Vitro Study.各种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化性能和生物相容性:体外研究。
J Endod. 2023 Jul;49(7):871-879. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 22.
10
Evaluation of new bioceramic endodontic sealers: An in vitro study.新型生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的评价:一项体外研究。
Dent Med Probl. 2022 Jan-Mar;59(1):85-92. doi: 10.17219/dmp/133954.

引用本文的文献

1
New Glass-Ceramics in the System CaSiO-Ca(PO)-Phase Composition, Microstructure, and Effect on the Cell Viability.CaSiO-Ca(PO)体系中的新型微晶玻璃——相组成、微观结构及其对细胞活力的影响
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 19;18(16):3887. doi: 10.3390/ma18163887.

本文引用的文献

1
A laboratory study to assess the physico-chemical properties of BioRoot RCS and BioRoot Flow exposed to citric acid and EDTA irrigating solutions.一项实验室研究评估了暴露于柠檬酸和 EDTA 冲洗液中的 BioRoot RCS 和 BioRoot Flow 的理化性能。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 28;28(12):662. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06067-6.
2
Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers: Apatite Deposition on Root Canal Dentin and pH Variation Analysis.硅酸钙基封闭剂:根管牙本质上的磷灰石沉积及pH值变化分析
Eur J Dent. 2025 May;19(2):374-381. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788685. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Biocompatibility, bioactivity, porosity, and sealer/dentin interface of bioceramic ready-to-use sealers using a dentin-tube model.
生物陶瓷即用型封闭剂的生物相容性、生物活性、孔隙率及与牙本质的密封剂/牙本质界面:基于牙本质管模型的研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 22;14(1):16768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66616-7.
4
Evaluation of Setting Time, Flowability, Film Thickness, and Radiopacity of Experimental Monocalcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers.实验性硅酸钙单根根管封闭剂的凝固时间、流动性、薄膜厚度和射线不透性评估。
Int J Dent. 2024 Apr 20;2024:8541653. doi: 10.1155/2024/8541653. eCollection 2024.
5
Physicochemical Changes in Root-Canal Sealers under Thermal Challenge: A Comparative Analysis of Calcium Silicate- and Epoxy-Resin-Based Sealers.热挑战下根管封闭剂的物理化学变化:硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基封闭剂的对比分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Apr 22;17(8):1932. doi: 10.3390/ma17081932.
6
The efficacy of premixed bioceramic sealers versus standard sealers on root canal treatment outcome, extrusion rate and post-obturation pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在根管治疗效果、挤出率和根管治疗后疼痛方面,预混生物陶瓷封闭剂与标准封闭剂的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Endod J. 2024 Aug;57(8):1021-1042. doi: 10.1111/iej.14069. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
7
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
8
Dentine Remineralisation Induced by "Bioactive" Materials through Mineral Deposition: An In Vitro Study.“生物活性”材料通过矿物质沉积诱导牙本质再矿化:一项体外研究。
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2024 Jan 27;14(3):274. doi: 10.3390/nano14030274.
9
Characterization and Assessment of Physical Properties of 3 Single Syringe Hydraulic Cement-based Sealers.3 种单支注射器水基根管封闭剂的物理性能评价与表征
J Endod. 2024 Mar;50(3):381-388. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
10
Physicochemical properties of AH plus bioceramic sealer, Bio-C Sealer, and ADseal root canal sealer.AH plus 生物陶瓷糊剂、Bio-C 根管封闭剂和 ADseal 根管封闭剂的理化性能。
Head Face Med. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13005-023-00403-z.