Chasen Ariel, Scheuermann Nicole L, Balser Teri, Chouvalova Anastasia, Coffman Clark, Conner Amanda, Cruz Adriel, Eden Alexander, Erdmann Robert M, Foster-Hartnett Dawn, Gerstner Benjamin, Ishikawa Cathy, Liepkalns Justine, Metzger Kelsey J, Segura Miriam, Smith-Keiling Beverly L, Williams Erika L, Wright Ashli M, Caporale Natalia
Department of STEM Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705.
Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2025 Sep 1;24(3):ar32. doi: 10.1187/cbe.24-02-0074.
Professional science societies stand at the intersection of science, education, and research, providing crucial professional development and career opportunities for scientists. Their structures and policies can either promote more equitable ideologies, practices and outcomes or deepen existing disparities within science. In recent years, many societies have implemented diversity statements and initiatives, but few studies have examined their actual impact on membership composition and the experiences of their minoritized members. Critical education scholars emphasize the importance of examining these experiences through frameworks that center their voices, acknowledge institutional racism, and address the power imbalances that exclude marginalized groups. This study uses the matrix of domination framework (Collins, 1990) and its four domains of power (structural, disciplinary, interpersonal, and cultural/hegemonic) to investigate the perceptions and experiences of inclusion/exclusion of the members of the Society for the Advancement of Biology Education Research (SABER). We identified factors that contribute to and detract from the society's equity goals by analyzing members' experiences at different systemic levels. By framing members' experiences through the lens of dimensions of power, we reveal relationships and structures that may have otherwise remained invisible, offering new insights into strategies that can better aid professional societies toward their equity goals.
专业科学协会处于科学、教育和研究的交叉点,为科学家提供至关重要的职业发展和职业机会。它们的结构和政策既可以促进更公平的意识形态、实践和成果,也可以加深科学界现有的差距。近年来,许多协会实施了多元化声明和举措,但很少有研究考察它们对会员构成及其少数群体成员经历的实际影响。批判性教育学者强调通过以他们的声音为中心、承认制度性种族主义并解决排除边缘化群体的权力不平衡问题的框架来审视这些经历的重要性。本研究使用支配矩阵框架(柯林斯,1990 年)及其四个权力领域(结构、学科、人际和文化/霸权)来调查生物学教育研究促进协会(SABER)成员对包容/排斥的看法和经历。我们通过分析成员在不同系统层面的经历,确定了有助于和有损该协会公平目标的因素。通过从权力维度的角度构建成员的经历,我们揭示了那些可能原本不为人知的关系和结构,为能够更好地帮助专业协会实现其公平目标的策略提供了新的见解。