Suppr超能文献

文化紧密-宽松度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数之间的关系:全球分析。

The relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Mar;5(3):e135-e144. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms-or cultural tightness-looseness-was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive.

METHODS

We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness-looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate.

FINDINGS

The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4·99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8·71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups cooperate much faster under threat and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat.

INTERPRETATION

Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats.

FUNDING

Office of Naval Research, US Navy.

摘要

背景

COVID-19 大流行是一场全球卫生危机,但某些国家在限制 COVID-19 病例和死亡人数方面取得了更大的成功。我们认为,集体威胁需要大量的协调,而严格遵守社会规范是使群体能够做到这一点的关键机制。在这里,我们研究了社会规范的强度——或者文化的紧密度——与各国在 2020 年 10 月之前限制病例和死亡人数的成功程度之间的关系。我们预计,具有严格规范和对违规行为进行惩罚的紧密文化,与规范较弱且更宽容的松散文化相比,每百万人的病例和死亡人数会更少。

方法

我们使用普通最小二乘法回归估计了截至 2020 年 10 月 16 日文化紧密度与 COVID-19 病例和死亡率之间的关系。我们拟合了一系列逐步模型,以捕捉在控制漏报、人口统计学、地缘政治因素、其他文化维度和气候因素的情况下,文化紧密度是否可以解释病例和死亡率的变化。

发现

结果表明,与具有高度文化紧密度的国家相比,具有高度文化松散度的国家的病例数估计分别高出 4.99 倍(分别为 7132 例/百万人和 1428 例/百万人),死亡人数高出 8.71 倍(分别为 183 例/百万人和 21 例/百万人),考虑到许多控制因素。一个正式的进化博弈论模型表明,在受到威胁时,紧密群体合作得更快,并且比松散群体有更高的存活率。结果表明,在集体威胁时期,加强社会规范可能会带来进化优势。

解释

截至 2020 年 10 月,严格遵守规范的国家比宽松的国家取得了更大的成功。需要采取新的干预措施来帮助各国加强社会规范,因为它们仍在与 COVID-19 和其他集体威胁作斗争。

资助

美国海军研究办公室。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ba/7946418/c4455cc80c52/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验