Urology Unit, Ospedale Policlinico e Nuovo Ospedale Civile S. Agostino Estense, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy .
Urology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 15;91(4):e2020112. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4.9132.
Background and aim of the work Patients with neurogenic bladder (NB) have an increased risk of developing bladder stones due to bladder catheter, incomplete bladder emptying, recurrent urinary tract infections, and immobilization. In these patients, minimally invasive treatments are usually adopted, as noninvasive extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy is limited by the risk of not clearing all stone fragments, and open surgery is usually discouraged. The aim of our study was to present our experience with trans-urethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) in patients treated by a tertiary referral center for NB. Methods We retrospectively collected pre-, intra- and post-operative data from our patients, who underwent TUCL from October 2013 to October 2019. The procedure was performed with a 24 Fr cystoscope and a ballistic lithotripter. Lapaxy was performed with Ellik bladder evacuator. All procedures were performed by two expert surgeons. Stone-free rate (SFR) was defined as the percentage of patients with absence of residual fragments > 2 mm in diameter. Results We performed consecutively 90 TUCLs in 75 patients during the selected period. SFR was 94.1%. Intra- and post-operative complications occurred in one (1.1%) patient. Our statistical analysis outlined the SFR was affected in a statistically significant way by sex, NB etiology, stone cumulative diameter, and operative time. Conclusion Our series proved the safety and efficacy of TUCL with ballistic lithotripsy in NB patients. Further multicenter randomized controlled trials are mandatory to validate definitively TUCL as the gold standard therapy for bladder urolithiasis in NB patients, and to identify risk factors limiting the SFR.
背景与目的
神经源性膀胱(NB)患者由于膀胱导管、不完全排空膀胱、反复尿路感染和固定不动,存在形成膀胱结石的风险增加。在这些患者中,通常采用微创治疗,因为非侵入性体外冲击波碎石术受到不能清除所有结石碎片的风险的限制,而且通常不鼓励开放性手术。我们研究的目的是介绍我们在三级转诊中心治疗 NB 患者时进行经尿道膀胱碎石术(TUCL)的经验。
方法
我们从 2013 年 10 月至 2019 年 10 月期间接受 TUCL 的患者中回顾性收集了术前、术中、术后的数据。该程序使用 24 Fr 膀胱镜和弹道碎石器进行。Lapaxy 使用 Ellik 膀胱抽吸器进行。所有程序均由两位专家外科医生完成。无结石率(SFR)定义为无残留碎片> 2mm 直径的患者百分比。
结果
在选定的时间段内,我们连续对 75 名患者进行了 90 次 TUCL,SFR 为 94.1%。术中及术后并发症发生在 1 例(1.1%)患者中。我们的统计分析表明,SFR 受到性别、NB 病因、结石累积直径和手术时间的影响,具有统计学意义。
结论
我们的系列研究证明了弹道碎石术 TUCL 在 NB 患者中的安全性和有效性。需要进一步的多中心随机对照试验来明确 TUCL 作为 NB 患者膀胱尿石症的金标准治疗,并确定限制 SFR 的危险因素。