Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3M2, Canada.
Alberta Health Services, 10101 Southport Road SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2W 3N2, Canada.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;21(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10247-4.
Negative experiences with school-based immunizations can contribute to vaccine hesitancy in youth and adulthood. We developed an evidence-based, multifaceted and customizable intervention to improve the immunization experience at school called the CARD™ (C-Comfort, A-Ask, R-Relax, D-Distract) system. We evaluated the feasibility of CARD™ implementation for school-based immunizations in Calgary, Canada.
In a mixed methods study, two Community Health Centres providing immunization services, including 5 schools each with grade 9 students (aged approximately 14 years), were randomized to CARD™ or control (usual care). In the CARD™ group, public health staff and students were educated about coping strategies prior to immunization clinics. Clinics were organized to reduce fear and to support student's choices for coping strategies. Public health staff in the CARD™ group participated in a focus group discussion afterwards. We sought a recruitment rate of 80% for eligible schools, an external stakeholder focus group (e.g., school staff) with 6 or more individuals, 85% of individual injection-related data acquisition (student and immunizer surveys), and 80% absolute agreement between raters for a subset of data that were double-coded. Across focus groups, we examined perceptions of acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility and fidelity of CARD™.
Nine (90%) of eligible schools participated. Of 219 students immunized, injection-related student and immunizer data forms were acquired for 195 (89.0%) and 196 (89.5%), respectively. Reliability of data collection was high. Fifteen public health and 5 school staff participated in separate focus groups. Overall, attitudes towards CARD™ were positive and compliance with individual components of CARD™ was high. Public health staff expressed skepticism regarding the value of student participation in the CARD™ system. Suggestions were made regarding processes to refine implementation.
While most outcome criteria were satisfied and overall perceptions of implementation outcomes were positive, some important challenges and opportunities were identified. Feedback is being used to inform a large cluster trial that will evaluate the impact of CARD™ during school-based immunizations.
The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03948633 ); Submitted April 24, 2019.
在校疫苗接种中产生的负面体验可能会导致青少年和成年人对接种疫苗犹豫不决。我们开发了一种基于证据的、多方面的和可定制的干预措施,以改善学校的免疫接种体验,称为 CARD™(C-舒适、A-询问、R-放松、D-分散注意力)系统。我们评估了在加拿大卡尔加里实施基于学校的免疫接种的 CARD™ 的可行性。
在一项混合方法研究中,两个提供免疫服务的社区卫生中心,每个中心包括 5 所学校(9 年级学生,年龄约 14 岁),随机分为 CARD™组或对照组(常规护理)。在 CARD™组中,公共卫生工作人员和学生在免疫接种前接受应对策略方面的教育。诊所的组织旨在减少恐惧,并支持学生选择应对策略。CARD™组的公共卫生工作人员随后参加了焦点小组讨论。我们希望招募率达到 80%,有外部利益相关者焦点小组(如学校工作人员),有 6 名或更多的参与者,85%的个人注射相关数据采集(学生和免疫人员调查),以及 80%的评分员对一组数据的绝对一致,这些数据是双编码的。在焦点小组中,我们检查了对 CARD™的可接受性、适当性、可行性和保真度的看法。
9 所(90%)符合条件的学校参加了。在 219 名接受免疫接种的学生中,获得了 195 名(89.0%)和 196 名(89.5%)学生和免疫人员与注射相关的数据表。数据收集的可靠性很高。15 名公共卫生和 5 名学校工作人员参加了单独的焦点小组。总的来说,对 CARD™的态度是积极的,对 CARD™各个组成部分的遵守程度很高。公共卫生工作人员对学生参与 CARD™系统的价值表示怀疑。提出了一些关于完善实施过程的建议。
虽然大多数结果标准都得到了满足,对实施结果的总体看法是积极的,但也发现了一些重要的挑战和机遇。正在根据反馈信息,为一项大型群组试验提供信息,该试验将评估 CARD™在学校免疫接种中的影响。
该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT03948633);2019 年 4 月 24 日提交。