Clinical Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, and Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Clinical, Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Vaccine. 2022 Apr 26;40(19):2802-2809. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.069. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
The CARD (Comfort Ask Relax Distract) system is a vaccine delivery framework that integrates evidence-based interventions to reduce stress-related responses and improve the vaccination experience for children undergoing vaccinations at school. In preliminary studies, CARD was acceptable and effective. The objective was to evaluate CARD in a large, pragmatic trial to confirm its effectiveness in real-world settings.
Hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomized trial in schools receiving vaccination services from Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Public Health. Forty schools with grade 7 students (12 years old) were randomized to CARD and control (n = 20/group). Nurses in CARD schools planned clinics with principals and educated students about CARD ahead of time. Principals disseminated information to staff and parents and sent reminders. Vaccination day processes minimized fear and facilitated student self-selected coping strategies. Nurses in control schools followed usual practices, which excluded principal meetings, education, reminders, and systematic integration of fear-reducing or child-selected coping strategies. Outcomes included stress-related symptoms (fear - primary outcome, pain, dizziness, fainting, post-vaccination reactions), use of coping interventions, vaccination uptake, attitudes and implementation outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity).
Altogether, 1919 students were included. Fear and pain were lower in CARD schools: OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.47-0.90) and OR 0.62 (95% CI 0.50-0.77), respectively. No students fainted in CARD schools compared to 0.8% in control (p = 0.02). Dizziness and post-vaccination reactions did not differ. Student-led coping interventions were used more frequently in CARD schools. Vaccination uptake was 76.1% in CARD schools and 72.5% in control schools (OR 1.13 (95% CI 0.85-1.50)). Staff and students had positive attitudes about CARD and implementation outcomes; however, recommendations were made to improve fidelity.
CARD reduced stress-related responses in students undergoing vaccinations at school and was positively received by students and public health staff. CARD is recommended to improve the quality of vaccination delivery services.
NCT03966300.
CARD(安慰、询问、放松、分散注意力)系统是一种疫苗接种框架,它整合了基于证据的干预措施,以减少与压力相关的反应,并改善在学校接种疫苗的儿童的接种体验。在初步研究中,CARD 是可以接受和有效的。本研究的目的是在一项大型的实用试验中评估 CARD,以确认其在现实环境中的有效性。
在接受惠灵顿-达福林-格罗夫公共卫生疫苗接种服务的学校中进行混合有效性-实施性集群随机试验。40 所 7 年级(12 岁)学生的学校被随机分为 CARD 组和对照组(每组 20 名)。CARD 学校的护士与校长一起规划诊所,并提前向学生宣传 CARD。校长向工作人员和家长传播信息并发送提醒。接种日的流程减少了恐惧,并促进了学生自我选择的应对策略。对照组学校的护士遵循常规做法,不包括校长会议、教育、提醒以及恐惧减轻或儿童选择的应对策略的系统整合。结果包括与压力相关的症状(恐惧-主要结果,疼痛、头晕、晕厥、接种后反应)、应对干预措施的使用、疫苗接种率、态度和实施结果(可接受性、适当性、可行性、保真度)。
共有 1919 名学生被纳入研究。CARD 组学生的恐惧和疼痛程度较低:OR 0.65(95%CI 0.47-0.90)和 OR 0.62(95%CI 0.50-0.77)。CARD 组没有学生晕厥,而对照组为 0.8%(p=0.02)。头晕和接种后反应无差异。CARD 组学生更频繁地使用以学生为主导的应对干预措施。CARD 组疫苗接种率为 76.1%,对照组为 72.5%(OR 1.13(95%CI 0.85-1.50))。工作人员和学生对 CARD 持积极态度,实施结果也较好;然而,建议提高保真度。
CARD 降低了在学校接种疫苗的学生的与压力相关的反应,并受到学生和公共卫生工作人员的欢迎。CARD 被推荐用于改善疫苗接种服务的质量。
NCT03966300。