Are dishonest politicians more likely to be reelected? A Bayesian view.
作者信息
Verschuere Bruno, De Schryver Maarten, van den Bergh Don, Wagenmakers Eric-Jan, Meijer Ewout
机构信息
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
Research Support Office, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
出版信息
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022718118.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Are dishonest politicians more likely to be reelected? A Bayesian view.不诚实的政客更有可能再次当选吗？一种贝叶斯观点。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022718118.
2
Common and distinct neural correlates of self-serving and prosocial dishonesty.自利型和利他型不诚实行为的共同和独特神经关联。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):3086-3103. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24062. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
The neural basis of dishonest decisions that serve to harm or help the target.对目标造成伤害或帮助的不诚实决策的神经基础。
Brain Cogn. 2014 Oct;90:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 28.
4
Dishonest Behavior in the Classroom and Clinical Setting: Perceptions and Engagement.课堂与临床环境中的不诚实行为：认知与参与度
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Feb 1;57(2):79-87. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180123-04.
5
Neural correlates of outcome processing post dishonest choice: an fMRI and ERP study.诚实选择后结果加工的神经关联：一项 fMRI 和 ERP 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Feb;68:148-57. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
6
Reasons for academic honesty and dishonesty with solutions: a study of pharmacy and medical students in New Zealand.学术诚信与不诚信的原因及解决办法：对新西兰药学和医学专业学生的一项研究
J Med Ethics. 2014 Oct;40(10):702-9. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101420. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
7
Automatic honesty forgoing reward acquisition and punishment avoidance: a functional MRI investigation.自动诚信行为：放弃奖励获取与避免惩罚的功能性磁共振成像研究
Neuroreport. 2017 Sep 27;28(14):879-883. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000848.
8
Reduced engagement of the anterior cingulate cortex in the dishonest decision-making of incarcerated psychopaths.入狱精神病患者在不诚实决策中前扣带皮层参与减少。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Sep 5;13(8):797-807. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy050.
9
The Role of Reward System in Dishonest Behavior: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.奖励系统在不诚实行为中的作用：一项功能近红外光谱研究。
Brain Topogr. 2021 Jan;34(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s10548-020-00804-2. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
10
The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception when remembering neutral and emotional events.背外侧前额叶皮层在回忆中性和情绪事件时的欺骗作用。
Neurosci Res. 2011 Feb;69(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
引用本文的文献
1
Reply to Verschuere et al.: On prior choice and effect size.对韦尔舒厄尔等人的回复：关于先验选择和效应量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 9;118(6). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2024269118.
本文引用的文献
1
Author Correction: Using Bayes factor hypothesis testing in neuroscience to establish evidence of absence.作者更正：在神经科学中使用贝叶斯因子假设检验来确立无证据的证明。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Nov;23(11):1453. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00710-7.
2
Eliciting preferences for truth-telling in a survey of politicians.在对政治家的调查中引出关于说实话的偏好。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22002-22008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008144117. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
3
Redefine statistical significance.重新定义统计学显著性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jan;2(1):6-10. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z.
4
The meaning of "significance" for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]. 1969.不同类型研究中“显著性”的含义[由埃里克 - 扬·瓦根梅克斯、丹尼·博斯博姆、乔西娜·韦尔哈根、罗吉尔·基维特、马尔扬·巴克、安热利克·克拉默、多拉·马特兹克、唐·梅伦伯格和汉·L·J·范德马斯翻译并注释]。1969年。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
5
The new statistics: why and how.新的统计数据：原因和方法。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Jan;25(1):7-29. doi: 10.1177/0956797613504966. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.虚假阳性心理学：在数据收集和分析中不披露的灵活性使得任何事物都可以被呈现为显著的。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
7
A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values.解决p值普遍存在问题的实用方法。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Oct;14(5):779-804. doi: 10.3758/bf03194105.
Zotero 插件