• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝叶斯数据分析融合:基于二次数据的信息先验概率对未测量混杂因素的概率敏感性分析。

Bayesian data fusion: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding using informative priors based on secondary data.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):730-741. doi: 10.1111/biom.13436. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1111/biom.13436
PMID:33527348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8326294/
Abstract

Bayesian causal inference offers a principled approach to policy evaluation of proposed interventions on mediators or time-varying exposures. Building on the Bayesian g-formula method introduced by Keil et al., we outline a general approach for the estimation of population-level causal quantities involving dynamic and stochastic treatment regimes, including regimes related to mediation estimands such as natural direct and indirect effects. We further extend this approach to propose a Bayesian data fusion (BDF), an algorithm for performing probabilistic sensitivity analysis when a confounder unmeasured in a primary data set is available in an external data source. When the relevant relationships are causally transportable between the two source populations, BDF corrects confounding bias and supports causal inference and decision-making within the main study population without sharing of the individual-level external data set. We present results from a simulation study comparing BDF to two common frequentist correction methods for unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding bias in the mediation setting. We use these methods to analyze data on the role of stage at cancer diagnosis in contributing to Black-White colorectal cancer survival disparities.

摘要

贝叶斯因果推断为评估拟议干预措施对中介或时变暴露的政策提供了一种原则性方法。基于 Keil 等人引入的贝叶斯 g 公式方法,我们概述了一种用于估计涉及动态和随机治疗方案的人群水平因果量的一般方法,包括与中介估计量相关的方案,如自然直接和间接效应。我们进一步扩展了这种方法,提出了一种贝叶斯数据融合 (BDF),这是一种当主要数据集未测量混杂因素在外部数据源中可用时执行概率敏感性分析的算法。当两个源人群之间的相关关系可以因果传递时,BDF 可以纠正混杂偏差,并在主要研究人群中支持因果推断和决策,而无需共享外部数据集的个体层面信息。我们从一项模拟研究中展示了结果,该研究将 BDF 与两种常见的在中介设置中纠正未测量中介-结局混杂偏差的频率派校正方法进行了比较。我们使用这些方法来分析癌症诊断阶段在导致黑人和白人结直肠癌生存差异中的作用的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/3769ce4db85c/nihms-1677419-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/8289135a92a2/nihms-1677419-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/6d89cbeea012/nihms-1677419-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/3b353d85fd98/nihms-1677419-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/3769ce4db85c/nihms-1677419-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/8289135a92a2/nihms-1677419-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/6d89cbeea012/nihms-1677419-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/3b353d85fd98/nihms-1677419-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc5/8326294/3769ce4db85c/nihms-1677419-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian data fusion: Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding using informative priors based on secondary data.贝叶斯数据分析融合:基于二次数据的信息先验概率对未测量混杂因素的概率敏感性分析。
Biometrics. 2022 Jun;78(2):730-741. doi: 10.1111/biom.13436. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.贝叶斯敏感性分析在因果中介分析中对未测量混杂因素的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):515-531. doi: 10.1177/0962280217729844. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
3
Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.通过对混杂因素-结局关系的信息先验进行调整,以消除未测量的混杂。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 22;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0634-3.
4
Negative Control Exposures: Causal Effect Identifiability and Use in Probabilistic-bias and Bayesian Analyses With Unmeasured Confounders.阴性对照暴露:有未测量混杂因素时概率偏差和贝叶斯分析中的因果效应可识别性和应用。
Epidemiology. 2022 Nov 1;33(6):832-839. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001528. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
5
Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in dynamic treatment regimes.用于动态治疗方案中未测量混杂因素的蒙特卡罗敏感性分析。
Biom J. 2023 Jun;65(5):e2100359. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100359. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
unmconf : an R package for Bayesian regression with unmeasured confounders.unmconf:一个用于具有未测量混杂因素的贝叶斯回归的 R 包。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02322-2.
7
A Bayesian nonparametric approach for causal mediation with a post-treatment confounder.贝叶斯非参数方法在存在后处理混杂因素时进行因果中介分析。
Biometrics. 2024 Jul 1;80(3). doi: 10.1093/biomtc/ujae099.
8
A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding.贝叶斯分析与蒙特卡洛分析在未测量混杂因素敏感性分析中的比较
Stat Med. 2017 Aug 15;36(18):2887-2901. doi: 10.1002/sim.7298. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
A flexible, interpretable framework for assessing sensitivity to unmeasured confounding.一种用于评估对未测量混杂因素敏感性的灵活、可解释框架。
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3453-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.6973. Epub 2016 May 3.
10
Causal simulation experiments: Lessons from bias amplification.因果模拟实验:从偏差放大中吸取的教训。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Jan;31(1):3-46. doi: 10.1177/0962280221995963. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Data Integration in Causal Inference.因果推断中的数据整合
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2023 Jan-Feb;15(1). doi: 10.1002/wics.1581. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
The role of body mass index at diagnosis of colorectal cancer on Black-White disparities in survival: a density regression mediation approach.诊断时的体重指数在结直肠癌黑-白种生存差异中的作用:密度回归中介方法。
Biostatistics. 2022 Apr 13;23(2):449-466. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxaa034.

本文引用的文献

1
Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language.斯坦:一种概率编程语言。
J Stat Softw. 2017;76. doi: 10.18637/jss.v076.i01. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
2
Bayesian nonparametric generative models for causal inference with missing at random covariates.用于在协变量随机缺失情况下进行因果推断的贝叶斯非参数生成模型。
Biometrics. 2018 Dec;74(4):1193-1202. doi: 10.1111/biom.12875. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
3
A Bayesian approach to the g-formula.贝叶斯方法在 g 公式中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Oct;27(10):3183-3204. doi: 10.1177/0962280217694665. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
4
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.贝叶斯敏感性分析在因果中介分析中对未测量混杂因素的影响。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Feb;28(2):515-531. doi: 10.1177/0962280217729844. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
5
Guided Bayesian imputation to adjust for confounding when combining heterogeneous data sources in comparative effectiveness research.在比较效果研究中合并异质数据源时,采用引导式贝叶斯插补法调整混杂因素。
Biostatistics. 2017 Jul 1;18(3):553-568. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx003.
6
Assessing methods for generalizing experimental impact estimates to target populations.将实验影响估计推广到目标人群的评估方法。
J Res Educ Eff. 2016;9(1):103-127. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2015.1060282. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
7
Causal inference and the data-fusion problem.因果推断与数据融合问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7345-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510507113.
8
Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.未测量的中介变量-结果混杂情况下中介效应的精确灵敏度界限
Biometrika. 2016 Jun;103(2):483-490. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asw012. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
9
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.无假设的敏感性分析。
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):368-77. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000457.
10
Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis.因果中介分析的半参数理论:效率界、多重稳健性和敏感性分析。
Ann Stat. 2012 Jun;40(3):1816-1845. doi: 10.1214/12-AOS990.