Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Department of Infectious Diseases, West German Centre of Infectious Diseases, Universitätsmedizin Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
J Med Virol. 2021 May;93(5):3047-3054. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26840. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
When patients with chronic kidney disease are infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) they can face two specific problems: virus-specific immune responses may be impaired and remdesivir, an antiviral drug described to shorten recovery, is contraindicated. Antiviral treatment with convalescent plasma (CP) could be an alternative treatment option. In this case report, we present two kidney transplant recipients and two hemodialysis patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and received CP. Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain in the S1 subunit of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were determined sequentially by immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutralization assay and specific cellular responses by interferon-gamma ELISpot. Before treatment, in both kidney transplant recipients and one hemodialysis patient antibodies were undetectable by ELISA (ratio < 1.1), corresponding to low neutralizing antibody titers (≤1:40). ELISpot responses in the four patients were either weak or absent. After CP treatment, we observed an increase of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies (IgG ratio and neutralization titer) and of specific cellular responses. After intermittent clinical improvement, one kidney transplant recipient again developed typical symptoms on Day 12 after treatment and received a second cycle of CP treatment. Altogether, three patients clinically improved and could be discharged from the hospital. However, one 83-year-old multimorbid patient deceased. Our data suggest that the success of CP therapy may only be temporary in patients with chronic kidney disease; which requires close monitoring of viral load and antiviral immunity and possibly an adaptation of the treatment regimen.
当慢性肾脏病患者感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 时,他们可能会面临两个具体问题:病毒特异性免疫反应可能受损,且瑞德西韦(一种据称能缩短康复时间的抗病毒药物)被禁用。使用恢复期血浆(CP)进行抗病毒治疗可能是一种替代治疗选择。在本病例报告中,我们介绍了两名肾移植受者和两名血液透析患者,他们感染了 SARS-CoV-2 并接受了 CP 治疗。通过 IgG 酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和中和试验,连续测定针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 S1 亚单位受体结合域的抗体,通过干扰素-γ ELISpot 测定特异性细胞反应。治疗前,两名肾移植受者和一名血液透析患者的 ELISA 检测不到抗体(比值<1.1),对应低中和抗体滴度(≤1:40)。四名患者的 ELISpot 反应均较弱或不存在。CP 治疗后,我们观察到 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体(IgG 比值和中和滴度)和特异性细胞反应增加。在间歇性临床改善后,一名肾移植受者在治疗后第 12 天再次出现典型症状,并接受了第二周期的 CP 治疗。共有三名患者临床状况改善并可出院。然而,一名 83 岁的多系统疾病患者死亡。我们的数据表明,CP 治疗的成功可能在慢性肾脏病患者中只是暂时的;这需要密切监测病毒载量和抗病毒免疫,并可能需要调整治疗方案。