Advanced Food Processing Research Laboratory, Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Tungkru, Bangkok, Thailand.
The Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Dusit, Bangkok, Thailand.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2021 Mar;20(2):1768-1799. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12701. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
Vitamins, peptides, essential oils, and probiotics are examples of health beneficial constituents, which are nevertheless heat-sensitive and possess poor chemical stability. Various encapsulation methods have been applied to protect these constituents against thermal and chemical degradations. Encapsulates prepared by different methods and/or at different conditions exhibit different microstructures, which in turn differently influence the encapsulation efficiency as well as retention of encapsulated core materials. This review provides a summary of various microstructures resulted from the use of selected encapsulation methods or systems, namely, spray coating; co-extrusion; emulsion-, micelle-, and liposome-based; coacervation; and ionic gelation encapsulation, at different conditions. Subsequent effects of the different microstructures on encapsulation efficiency and retention of encapsulated core materials are mentioned and discussed. Encapsulates having compact microstructures resulted from the use of low-surface tension and low-viscosity encapsulants, high-stability encapsulation systems, lower loads of core materials to total solids of encapsulants and appropriate solidification conditions have proved to exhibit higher encapsulation efficiencies and better retention of encapsulated core materials. Encapsulates with hollow, dent, shrunken microstructures or thinner walls resulted from inappropriate solidification conditions and higher loads of core materials, on the other hand, possess lower encapsulation efficiencies and protection capabilities. Encapsulates having crack, blow-hole or porous microstructures resulted from the use of high-viscosity encapsulants and inappropriate solidification conditions exhibit the lowest encapsulation efficiencies and poorest protection capabilities. Compact microstructures and structures formed between ionic biopolymers could be used to regulate the release of encapsulated cores.
维生素、肽、精油和益生菌是对健康有益的成分的例子,但它们对热敏感,化学稳定性差。已经应用了各种封装方法来保护这些成分免受热和化学降解。通过不同的方法和/或在不同的条件下制备的封装体具有不同的微观结构,这反过来又不同地影响封装效率以及封装核心材料的保留。本综述提供了使用选定的封装方法或系统(即喷雾涂层;共挤出;乳液、胶束和脂质体基;凝聚;离子凝胶化封装)在不同条件下产生的各种微观结构的摘要。随后提到并讨论了不同微观结构对封装效率和封装核心材料保留的影响。使用低表面张力和低粘度包封剂、高稳定性包封系统、核心材料对包封剂总固体的低负载和适当的固化条件产生的具有紧凑微观结构的封装体已被证明具有更高的封装效率和更好的封装核心材料保留。另一方面,由于固化条件不当和核心材料负载较高而具有空心、凹痕、收缩微观结构或较薄壁的封装体具有较低的封装效率和保护能力。由于使用高粘度包封剂和不当的固化条件而具有裂纹、气孔或多孔微观结构的封装体表现出最低的封装效率和最差的保护能力。离子生物聚合物之间形成的紧凑微观结构和结构可用于调节封装核心的释放。