Department of Obstetrics and Food Animal Medicine Clinic, University of Veterinary Medicine, Üllő, Hungary.
MTA-SZIE Large Animal Clinical Research Group, Üllő, Hungary.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2021 Apr;56(4):673-679. doi: 10.1111/rda.13904. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
The objective of this study was to investigate three different calving detection systems in order to assess and compare their efficiency. The study was conducted at a large-scale dairy farm involving 54 Holstein-Friesian dairy cows and heifers. Animals were fitted with multiple devices: a rumination measuring device (Ruminact (RA)), an intravaginal thermometer (Vel'Phone (VP)) and a tail movement sensor (Moocall (MC)) 5 to 7 days before expected calving and were removed after parturition. RA detects rumination time (RT) and calculates it in 2-hr intervals. VP detects a decrease in vaginal temperature that might indicate calving within 48 hr and the drop in temperature resulting from the expulsion of the device at calving (EXP message). MC detected increased tail movements and if they persisted for one hour, 1HA message was sent. If they continued during the subsequent hour, then 2HA message was sent. Messages sent by MC within 4 hr before calving (C4) were selected retrospectively as true positives for the prediction of calving, using the significant changes in RT as a baseline. All other messages were categorized as false positive. The mean value of RT decreased in a non-significant manner between interval -22 and -4 before calving. Significant decrease of RT was detectable between the two intervals of -4 and -2 before calving (24.7 ± 18.6 min/2 hr and 14.0 ± 13.0 min/2 hr, respectively). There was no significant difference between RT of primiparous and multiparous animals. EXP messages were accurate (positive predictive value 100%) indicators of the onset of calving. We received on average 12.7 ± 15.2 messages/animal (11.0 ± 10.1 and 16.6 ± 22.2 for cows and heifers, respectively). Positive predictive value was 12.6%. The number of false-positive messages was significantly higher in heifers. All three automatic systems could be used in a large-scale farm environment.
本研究旨在评估和比较三种不同的产犊检测系统的效率。研究在一家大型奶牛场进行,涉及 54 头荷斯坦奶牛和小母牛。动物身上佩戴了多个设备:反刍测量设备(Ruminact(RA))、阴道温度计(Vel'Phone(VP))和尾部运动传感器(Moocall(MC)),在预计产犊前 5 至 7 天佩戴,并在分娩后移除。RA 检测反刍时间(RT)并以 2 小时为间隔进行计算。VP 检测阴道温度的下降,可能在 48 小时内表明产犊,以及产犊时设备排出导致的温度下降(EXP 消息)。MC 检测到尾部运动增加,如果持续一小时,则发送 1HA 消息。如果在接下来的一小时内继续,则发送 2HA 消息。MC 在产犊前 4 小时内发送的消息(C4)被选为产犊预测的真阳性,以 RT 的显著变化为基线。所有其他消息均归类为假阳性。在产犊前 -22 至 -4 小时之间,RT 的平均值呈非显著下降趋势。在产犊前 -4 至 -2 小时之间,可以检测到 RT 的显著下降(24.7±18.6 分钟/2 小时和 14.0±13.0 分钟/2 小时)。初产动物和经产动物的 RT 没有显著差异。EXP 消息是产犊开始的准确(阳性预测值 100%)指标。我们平均收到每头动物 12.7±15.2 条消息(牛和小母牛分别为 11.0±10.1 和 16.6±22.2)。阳性预测值为 12.6%。小母牛的假阳性消息数量明显更高。所有三种自动系统都可以在大型农场环境中使用。