• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部赋形剂在减少骨科植入物生物膜形成中的有效性:体外分析。

Effectiveness of topical adjuvants in reducing biofilm formation on orthopedic implants: an in vitro analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UConn Health, Farmington, CT, USA.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.009
PMID:33529773
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection is complicated by the presence of residual biofilm, which resists eradication owing to bacterial adherence to orthopedic implants. The purpose of this study was to compare Bactisure (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA), povidone-iodine (Betadine), and chlorhexidine gluconate solution (Irrisept; Irrimax, Gainesville, FL, USA) in reducing biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Cutibacterium acnes inoculated on cobalt-chrome, titanium, and stainless steel disks, representing metals commonly used for shoulder arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that there would be no significant difference in biofilm reduction among the 3 topical adjuvants.

METHODS

Strains of S aureus (ATCC 35556), S epidermidis (ATCC 35984), and C acnes (LMG 16711) were grown on cobalt-chrome, titanium, and stainless steel disks. For each strain, the disks were divided into 4 groups: (1) control, (2) povidone-iodine (Betadine), (3) chlorhexidine gluconate (Irrisept), and (4) Bactisure. Bacteria were grown on 5% sheep blood agar plates. Biofilm eradication was quantified using adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence and compared with controls 48 and 72 hours after implementation of the topical adjuvant.

RESULTS

At 72 hours after implementation of the topical adjuvant, a statistically significant reduction in colony-forming units was observed for all topical adjuvants across all tested metals, as compared with their respective control. With respect to the topical adjuvants themselves, Bactisure more consistently demonstrated the most significant reduction in colony-forming units across all bacteria when the tested medium was adjusted for, with the exception of S aureus, which showed similar results to Betadine at 72 hours.

CONCLUSION

By use of commonly encountered topical adjuvants on S aureus-, S epidermidis-, and C acnes-inoculated disks of various implant metals, a significant reduction in biofilm production was observed. Bactisure, a recent Food and Drug Administration-approved topical adjuvant, demonstrated the overall greatest efficacy of the agents studied.

摘要

背景与假说

假体周围关节感染的治疗较为复杂,因为存在残留的生物膜,而生物膜会使细菌黏附于骨科植入物,从而导致其难以被清除。本研究旨在比较 Bactisure(美国 Zimmer Biomet,印第安纳州华沙)、聚维酮碘(Betadine)和葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液(Irrisept;美国 Irrimax,佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔)在减少接种于钴铬、钛和不锈钢盘的金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌生物膜形成方面的效果。假设是这 3 种局部辅助剂在减少生物膜方面没有显著差异。

方法

金黄色葡萄球菌(ATCC 35556)、表皮葡萄球菌(ATCC 35984)和痤疮丙酸杆菌(LMG 16711)菌株在钴铬、钛和不锈钢盘上生长。对于每种菌株,将圆盘分为 4 组:(1)对照组,(2)聚维酮碘(Betadine)组,(3)葡萄糖酸氯己定(Irrisept)组,和(4)Bactisure 组。细菌在 5%羊血琼脂平板上生长。在实施局部辅助剂后 48 小时和 72 小时,使用三磷酸腺苷生物发光法定量检测生物膜清除率,并与对照组进行比较。

结果

在实施局部辅助剂 72 小时后,与各自的对照组相比,所有测试金属上的所有局部辅助剂均观察到细菌的菌落形成单位显著减少。就局部辅助剂本身而言,Bactisure 在调整测试介质后,在所有细菌中表现出更一致的最显著的菌落形成单位减少,除了金黄色葡萄球菌,其在 72 小时时与 Betadine 表现出相似的结果。

结论

在各种植入金属的金黄色葡萄球菌、表皮葡萄球菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌接种盘上使用常见的局部辅助剂,观察到生物膜生成显著减少。Bactisure 是一种最近获得美国食品和药物管理局批准的局部辅助剂,在研究的药物中显示出最高的总体功效。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of topical adjuvants in reducing biofilm formation on orthopedic implants: an in vitro analysis.局部赋形剂在减少骨科植入物生物膜形成中的有效性:体外分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Topical adjuvants incompletely remove adherent Staphylococcus aureus from implant materials.局部佐剂不能完全清除植入材料上附着的金黄色葡萄球菌。
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jun;36(6):1599-1604. doi: 10.1002/jor.23804. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
3
What Is the Duration of Irrigation? An In Vitro Study of the Minimum Exposure Time to Eradicate Bacteria With Irrigation Solutions.冲洗时间是多久?一种评估冲洗液消灭细菌所需最短暴露时间的体外研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):385-389.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.氮化锆涂层减少骨科植入物表面表皮葡萄球菌生物膜的形成:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):461-466. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000568.
5
Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.常见消毒剂对生物膜中临床相关微生物的功效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2.
6
Complete Eradication of Biofilm From Orthopedic Materials.彻底清除骨科材料中的生物膜。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2513-2518. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
7
Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation and betadine decontaminate nosocomial pathogens from implant surfaces.阴极电压控制的电刺激和聚维酮碘对植入物表面的医院病原体进行消毒。
mSphere. 2024 Feb 28;9(2):e0058323. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00583-23. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
8
Ability of adhesion and biofilm formation of pathogens of periprosthetic joint infections on titanium-niobium nitride (TiNbN) ceramic coatings.钛铌氮(TiNbN)陶瓷涂层上人工关节假体感染病原菌的黏附及生物膜形成能力。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Mar 4;15(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01613-w.
9
Sphingosine is able to prevent and eliminate Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation on different orthopedic implant materials in vitro.鞘氨醇能够防止和消除表皮葡萄球菌在不同骨科植入物材料上的生物膜形成。
J Mol Med (Berl). 2020 Feb;98(2):209-219. doi: 10.1007/s00109-019-01858-x. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
10
Nanoparticle ultrasonication outperforms conventional irrigation solutions in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilm from titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.纳米颗粒超声处理在消除钛表面金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜方面优于传统冲洗液:一项体外研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2729-2734. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03982-y. Epub 2024 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Adjunctive Antiseptic Lavage Solution in Managing Acute Hip/Knee Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Comparative Study in a Tertiary Revision Center.辅助性抗菌灌洗溶液在治疗急性髋/膝关节假体周围感染中的疗效:在三级翻修中心的一项对比研究
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jan 21;31:101593. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101593. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Efficacy of the preformulated irrigation solution Bactisure® in acute periprosthetic joint infection debridement surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.预制冲洗液 Bactisure® 在急性人工关节周围感染清创术中的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Nov 16;25(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08637-1.
3
Impact of a Novel Antiseptic Lavage Solution on Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
一种新型抗菌灌洗溶液对髋膝关节置换术后急性假体周围关节感染的影响
J Clin Med. 2024 May 24;13(11):3092. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113092.
4
An In Vitro Study to Assess the Best Strategy for the Chemical Debridement of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.一项评估人工关节周围感染化学清创最佳策略的体外研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 2;12(10):1507. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101507.
5
A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染清创及翻修关节成形术的当前实践综述
Arthroplasty. 2022 Sep 1;4(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00136-5.
6
Preclinical evaluation of a commercially available biofilm disrupting wound lavage for musculoskeletal trauma.商业化生物膜破坏型创伤灌洗液在肌肉骨骼创伤中的临床前评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03199-x.
7
Efficacy of Three Povidone Iodine Formulations against Assessed through In Vitro Studies: A Preliminary Study.通过体外研究评估三种聚维酮碘制剂的疗效:一项初步研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 16;11(5):665. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050665.