• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部佐剂不能完全清除植入材料上附着的金黄色葡萄球菌。

Topical adjuvants incompletely remove adherent Staphylococcus aureus from implant materials.

作者信息

Ernest Emily P, Machi Anthony S, Karolcik Brock A, LaSala Paul R, Dietz Matthew J

机构信息

Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, Department of Orthopaedics, West Virginia University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 9196, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506-9196.

Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 9100, Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506-9100.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 2018 Jun;36(6):1599-1604. doi: 10.1002/jor.23804. Epub 2017 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1002/jor.23804
PMID:29139579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5953801/
Abstract

Adjuvant treatments including Betadine, Dakin's solution (sodium hypochlorite), or hydrogen peroxide (H O ) have been attempted to eradicate prosthetic joint infection caused by biofilm or intracellular bacteria. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro abilities of chemical adjuvants to decrease Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) biofilm presence on orthopaedic implant grade materials, including titanium, stainless steel, and cobalt chrome. S. aureus biofilms were grown for 48 h and evaluated for baseline colony forming units/centimeter squared (CFU/cm ) and compared to treatments with Betadine, Dakin's solution, H O , or 1% chlorine dioxide (ClO ). Control discs (n = 18) across all metals had an average of 4.2 × 10 CFU/cm . All treatments had statistically significant reductions in CFU/cm when compared to respective control discs (p < 0.05). For all metals combined, the most efficacious treatments were Betadine and H O , with an average 98% and 97% CFU/cm reduction, respectively. There were no significant differences between reductions seen with Betadine and H O , but both groups had statistically greater reductions than Dakin's solution and ClO . There was no change in antibiotic resistance patterns after treatment. Analysis of S. aureus biofilms demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in biofilm after a five-minute treatment with the modalities, with an average two log reduction in CFU/cm . Statement of clinical significance: While statistically significant reductions in CFU/cm were accomplished with chemical adjuvant treatments, the overall concentration of bacteria never fell below 10 CFU/cm , leading to questionable clinical significance. Further techniques to eradicate biofilm should be investigated. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:1599-1604, 2018.

摘要

已尝试使用包括碘伏、达金氏溶液(次氯酸钠)或过氧化氢(H₂O₂)在内的辅助治疗方法来根除由生物膜或细胞内细菌引起的人工关节感染。本研究的目的是评估化学辅助剂在体外降低金黄色葡萄球菌(S. aureus)在骨科植入级材料(包括钛、不锈钢和钴铬合金)上形成生物膜的能力。金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜生长48小时,并评估其基线菌落形成单位/平方厘米(CFU/cm²),并与用碘伏、达金氏溶液、H₂O₂或1%二氧化氯(ClO₂)处理后的情况进行比较。所有金属的对照圆盘(n = 18)平均有4.2×10⁵ CFU/cm²。与各自的对照圆盘相比,所有处理的CFU/cm²均有统计学显著降低(p < 0.05)。对于所有金属综合来看,最有效的处理方法是碘伏和H₂O₂,平均CFU/cm²降低分别为98%和97%。碘伏和H₂O₂处理后的降低效果之间没有显著差异,但两组在统计学上的降低幅度均大于达金氏溶液和ClO₂。处理后抗生素耐药模式没有变化。对金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的分析表明,用这些方法处理五分钟后,生物膜有统计学显著减少,CFU/cm²平均减少两个对数。临床意义声明:虽然化学辅助治疗在统计学上显著降低了CFU/cm²,但细菌的总体浓度从未降至10³ CFU/cm²以下,导致临床意义存疑。应研究根除生物膜的进一步技术。© 2017骨科研究协会。由威利期刊公司出版。《矫形外科学研究》36:1599 - 1604,2018年。

相似文献

1
Topical adjuvants incompletely remove adherent Staphylococcus aureus from implant materials.局部佐剂不能完全清除植入材料上附着的金黄色葡萄球菌。
J Orthop Res. 2018 Jun;36(6):1599-1604. doi: 10.1002/jor.23804. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
2
Effectiveness of topical adjuvants in reducing biofilm formation on orthopedic implants: an in vitro analysis.局部赋形剂在减少骨科植入物生物膜形成中的有效性:体外分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Sep;30(9):2177-2183. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.12.009. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
3
Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.氮化锆涂层减少骨科植入物表面表皮葡萄球菌生物膜的形成:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):461-466. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000568.
4
Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation and betadine decontaminate nosocomial pathogens from implant surfaces.阴极电压控制的电刺激和聚维酮碘对植入物表面的医院病原体进行消毒。
mSphere. 2024 Feb 28;9(2):e0058323. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00583-23. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
5
Reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms from implant materials in a diffusion dominated environment.在扩散主导环境下,减少植入材料上铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的形成。
J Orthop Res. 2018 Nov;36(11):3081-3085. doi: 10.1002/jor.24074. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
6
Chlorhexidine Antiseptic Irrigation Eradicates Staphylococcus epidermidis From Biofilm: An In Vitro Study.洗必泰抗菌冲洗液可清除生物膜中的表皮葡萄球菌:一项体外研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Mar;476(3):648-653. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000052.
7
Efficacy of common antiseptic solutions against clinically relevant microorganisms in biofilm.常见消毒剂对生物膜中临床相关微生物的功效。
Bone Joint J. 2021 May;103-B(5):908-915. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B5.BJJ-2020-1245.R2.
8
Rapid degradation and non-selectivity of Dakin's solution prevents effectiveness in contaminated musculoskeletal wound models.达金氏溶液的快速降解和非选择性使其在受污染的肌肉骨骼创伤模型中无法发挥有效作用。
Injury. 2018 Oct;49(10):1763-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
9
Antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate bead and pulse lavage eradicates biofilms on metal implant materials in vitro.载抗生素硫酸钙珠粒与脉冲冲洗在体外可根除金属植入材料上的生物膜。
J Orthop Res. 2018 Sep;36(9):2349-2354. doi: 10.1002/jor.23903. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
10
Vancomycin displays time-dependent eradication of mature Staphylococcus aureus biofilms.万古霉素对成熟的金黄色葡萄球菌生物被膜具有时间依赖性清除作用。
J Orthop Res. 2017 Feb;35(2):381-388. doi: 10.1002/jor.23291. Epub 2016 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Orthopedic Surgery Irrigation: A Review of Traditional Agents and the Emergence of Citrate-Based Solutions.骨科手术冲洗技术的进展:传统冲洗剂及枸橼酸盐基溶液的出现综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 24;14(11):3681. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113681.
2
Not All Antiseptic Solutions Are Equivalent in Removing Biofilm: A Comparison Across Different Orthopaedic Surfaces.并非所有抗菌溶液在去除生物膜方面都等效:不同骨科表面的比较
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Jan 15;107(2):127-133. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01118. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Does a Specific Sequential Combination of Antiseptic Solutions for Chemical Debridement in Periprosthetic Joint Infection Improve Outcomes vs. Solution Alone? An In Vivo Study.与单独使用溶液相比,用于人工关节感染化学清创的特定顺序组合抗菌溶液能否改善治疗效果?一项体内研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 17;13(12):1225. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121225.
4
Enhanced antibiofilm potential of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound combined with 0.35% povidone-iodine in a rat model of periprosthetic joint infection.低强度脉冲超声联合0.35%聚维酮碘在人工关节感染大鼠模型中的抗生物膜潜力增强
Bone Joint Res. 2024 Jul 5;13(7):332-341. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.137.BJR-2023-0339.R1.
5
The stability of Staphylococcal bacteriophages with commonly used prosthetic joint infection lavage solutions.金葡菌噬菌体在常用的人工关节感染灌洗溶液中的稳定性。
J Orthop Res. 2024 Mar;42(3):555-559. doi: 10.1002/jor.25731. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
An In Vitro Study to Assess the Best Strategy for the Chemical Debridement of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.一项评估人工关节周围感染化学清创最佳策略的体外研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Oct 2;12(10):1507. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12101507.
7
Hydrogen Peroxide, Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Fail to Eradicate Biofilm from Infected Implant Materials.过氧化氢、聚维酮碘和氯己定无法清除感染植入材料上的生物膜。
Life (Basel). 2023 May 23;13(6):1230. doi: 10.3390/life13061230.
8
A review of current practices in periprosthetic joint infection debridement and revision arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染清创及翻修关节成形术的当前实践综述
Arthroplasty. 2022 Sep 1;4(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00136-5.
9
The role of hydrogen peroxide in hip arthroplasty: A narrative review.过氧化氢在髋关节置换术中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
J Perioper Pract. 2022 Jul-Aug;32(7-8):178-182. doi: 10.1177/1750458921996259. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
10
Pursuit of the ideal antiseptic irrigation solution in the management of periprosthetic joint infections.寻找用于处理人工关节周围感染的理想抗菌冲洗液。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2021 May 26;6(6):189-198. doi: 10.5194/jbji-6-189-2021. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Acoustic vibration can enhance bacterial biofilm formation.声振动可增强细菌生物膜的形成。
J Biosci Bioeng. 2016 Dec;122(6):765-770. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
2
Enzymatic degradation of in vitro Staphylococcus aureus biofilms supplemented with human plasma.补充人血浆的体外金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜的酶促降解
Infect Drug Resist. 2016 Apr 27;9:71-8. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S103101. eCollection 2016.
3
Antibiotic-tolerant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Persists on Arthroplasty Materials.耐抗生素的金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜在关节置换材料上持续存在。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1649-56. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4720-8.
4
Optimal Irrigation and Debridement of Infected Total Joint Implants with Chlorhexidine Gluconate.使用葡萄糖酸氯己定对感染的全关节植入物进行最佳冲洗和清创
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Oct;30(10):1820-2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 May 15.
5
Comparative proteomic analysis of extracellular proteins expressed by various clonal types of Staphylococcus aureus and during planktonic growth and biofilm development.不同克隆类型金黄色葡萄球菌在浮游生长和生物膜形成过程中表达的细胞外蛋白质的比较蛋白质组学分析。
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jun 3;6:524. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00524. eCollection 2015.
6
The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections.微生物生物膜在人工关节感染中的作用。
Acta Orthop. 2015 Apr;86(2):147-58. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.966290. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
A method for quantitative determination of biofilm viability.一种用于定量测定生物膜活力的方法。
J Funct Biomater. 2012 Jun 1;3(2):418-31. doi: 10.3390/jfb3020418.
8
Clinical presentation and treatment of orthopaedic implant-associated infection.骨科植入物相关感染的临床表现与治疗。
J Intern Med. 2014 Aug;276(2):111-9. doi: 10.1111/joim.12233.
9
Pulse lavage is inadequate at removal of biofilm from the surface of total knee arthroplasty materials.脉冲灌洗在去除全膝关节置换材料表面生物膜方面效果不佳。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun;29(6):1128-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.012. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
10
Mortality after septic versus aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty: a matched-cohort study.感染性与无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术后的死亡率:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):56-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.041. Epub 2013 Aug 9.