Combat Wound Care Department, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Building 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX, 78234, USA.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jul 15;17(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03199-x.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of open fractures remains a significant challenge in trauma care as these fractures are accompanied by extensive soft tissue damage, exposing the wound site to contaminants and increasing infection risk. Formation of biofilm, a capsule-like environment that acts as a barrier to treatment, is a primary mode by which infecting pathogens persist at the wound site. Therefore, a pressing need exists to identify irrigation methods that can disrupt biofilm and expose pathogens to treatment. This study aims to evaluate the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, in comparison with saline for care of severe musculoskeletal wounds and elucidate potential effects on antibiotic treatment success. METHODS: UAMS-1 Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were formed in vitro and treated with Bactisure™ wound lavage or sterile normal saline, alone, or in combination with sub-biofilm inhibitory levels of vancomycin. Characterization methods included quantification of biofilm biomass, quantification of viable biofilm bacteria, and biofilm matrix imaging. For in vivo assessment, a delayed treatment model of contaminated open fracture was used wherein a critical-sized defect was created in a rat femur and wound site inoculated with UAMS-1. Following a 6 h delay, wounds were debrided, irrigated with lavage of interest, and antibiotic treatments administered. Bacterial enumeration was performed on bone and hardware samples after two weeks. RESULTS: An immediate reduction in biofilm biomass was observed in vitro following antibiofilm lavage treatment, with a subsequent 2- to 3- log reduction in viable bacteria achieved after 24 h. Furthermore, biofilms treated with antibiofilm lavage in combination with vancomycin exhibited a minor, but statistically significant, decrease in viable bacteria compared to irrigation alone. In vivo, a minor, not statistically significant, decrease in median bioburden was observed for the antibiofilm lavage compared to saline when used in combination with antibiotics. However, the percentage of bone and hardware samples with detectable bacteria was reduced from 50 to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the antibiofilm wound lavage, Bactisure™, may hold promise in mitigating infection in contaminated musculoskeletal wounds and warrants further investigation. Here, we proposed multiple mechanisms in vitro by which this antibiofilm lavage may help mitigate infection, and demonstrate this treatment slightly outperforms saline in controlling bioburden in vivo.
背景:开放性骨折的治疗仍然是创伤护理中的一个重大挑战,因为这些骨折伴随着广泛的软组织损伤,使伤口部位暴露于污染物中,增加了感染的风险。生物膜的形成是一种胶囊状的环境,作为治疗的屏障,它是感染病原体在伤口部位持续存在的主要模式。因此,迫切需要确定能够破坏生物膜并使病原体暴露于治疗的冲洗方法。本研究旨在评估抗菌膜伤口冲洗液 Bactisure™与生理盐水相比,在严重肌肉骨骼伤口护理中的效果,并阐明其对抗生素治疗成功的潜在影响。
方法:在体外形成 UAMS-1 金黄色葡萄球菌生物膜,并单独或联合亚生物膜抑制水平的万古霉素处理 Bactisure™伤口冲洗液或无菌生理盐水。特征描述方法包括生物膜生物量的定量、活生物膜细菌的定量和生物膜基质成像。在体内评估中,使用污染性开放性骨折的延迟治疗模型,在大鼠股骨中创建临界尺寸缺陷,并将 UAMS-1 接种到伤口部位。在 6 小时的延迟后,清创伤口,用感兴趣的冲洗液冲洗,并给予抗生素治疗。两周后,对骨和硬件样本进行细菌计数。
结果:体外抗菌膜冲洗处理后,生物膜生物量立即减少,24 小时后活细菌数量减少 2-3 对数级。此外,与单独冲洗相比,用抗菌膜冲洗液联合万古霉素处理的生物膜活细菌数量略有减少,但具有统计学意义。在体内,与生理盐水相比,当与抗生素联合使用时,抗菌膜冲洗液对生物膜的中位数生物负荷的降低较小,但无统计学意义。然而,可检测到细菌的骨和硬件样本的百分比从 50%降低到 38%。
结论:这些结果表明,抗菌膜伤口冲洗液 Bactisure™可能有希望减轻污染性肌肉骨骼伤口的感染,并值得进一步研究。在这里,我们提出了体外多种可能有助于减轻感染的抗菌膜冲洗机制,并证明这种治疗方法在控制体内生物负荷方面略优于生理盐水。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022-7-15
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018-3-15
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019-11-13
J Orthop. 2024-1-30
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023-7-29
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021-9
Front Immunol. 2019-7-23
EFORT Open Rev. 2018-5-21
N Engl J Med. 2015-10-8