Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, 35-2 Sakae-cho, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa city, Saitama 359-1192, Japan.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 May-Jun;94:104357. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104357. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
Preventing social isolation is essential for promoting healthy aging. This study aims to 1) systematically review and synthesize the predictors of objectively measured social isolation from observational studies that have treated isolation as an outcome in community-dwelling older adults, and 2) overview previous studies in this area and reveal an agenda to develop future research.
Peer-reviewed primary studies published in English or Japanese were identified from PubMed, ScienceDirect, PsycINFO, Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi, and CiNii. We followed the PRISMA statement. Risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Of the 1,161 studies identified, 10 were included in the review. Most studies were cross-sectional and published in the past 20 years. The risk of bias score ranged from 3 to 6 for the individual studies, indicating a moderate to high risk. The assessment measures for social isolation and proportion of isolated subjects varied greatly across studies. Findings on the predictors of social isolation from each study were clustered into four categories: socio-demographic factors, physical health factors, psychological and cognitive factors, and social and cultural factors.
It was difficult to confirm these predictors conclusively because of the cross-sectional study design and a huge variety of assessment tools for social isolation. This result suggests the need to build consensus on the appropriate scales and standard cut-off points for assessing social isolation. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are urgently required. When considering predictors of social isolation, it is also essential to consider the regional and ethnic background of the samples studied.
预防社会隔离对于促进健康老龄化至关重要。本研究旨在:1)系统地回顾和综合观察性研究中客观测量的社会隔离的预测因素,这些研究将隔离作为社区居住的老年人的结果进行了处理;2)概述该领域的以往研究,并揭示制定未来研究议程。
从 PubMed、ScienceDirect、PsycINFO、Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi 和 CiNii 中确定了以英文或日文发表的同行评审的主要研究。我们遵循 PRISMA 声明。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
在确定的 1161 项研究中,有 10 项研究被纳入综述。大多数研究为横断面研究,发表于过去 20 年。个体研究的偏倚风险评分范围为 3 至 6,表明存在中等到高风险。社会隔离的评估测量和孤立对象的比例在研究之间差异很大。每项研究对社会隔离预测因素的研究结果分为四类:社会人口因素、身体健康因素、心理和认知因素以及社会和文化因素。
由于横断面研究设计和社会隔离评估工具种类繁多,因此很难确定这些预测因素。这一结果表明有必要就评估社会隔离的适当量表和标准截止点达成共识。此外,还迫切需要进行纵向研究。在考虑社会隔离的预测因素时,还必须考虑到研究样本的地区和种族背景。