Suppr超能文献

穴位埋线治疗功能性便秘的系统评价和 Meta 分析方案

Acupoint catgut embedding therapy for functional constipation: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Acupuncture-Moxibustion and Tuina.

School of Nursing.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 29;100(4):e24286. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024286.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This review will assess current evidence related to the effectiveness and safety of acupoint catgut embedding therapy for functional constipation (FC) and provide efficacy assessments for clinical applications.

METHODS

We will search the following databases for relevant trials: PubMed, EMBASE OVID, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, OVID MEDLINE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane library, and Scopus. We will also search the following Chinese databases for trials published in the Chinese literature: China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), Chinese Scientific Journals Database, Wan Fang Database, Chinese Biomedicine and other resources from inception to December 2020. Only randomized controlled trials comparing acupoint catgut embedding versus acupuncture or sham acupuncture or placebo or other therapies will be included. The outcomes involved mean spontaneous bowel movements, complete spontaneous bowel movements, the Bristol Stool Form Scale, the Cleveland Clinic Score, Patient Assessment of Constipation symptom and so on. The risk of bias assessment and quality of evidence for outcomes will be appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. RevMan 5.3 software will be employed for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

This work will compare and arrange the comparative efficacy of acupoint catgut embedding with different treatments for FC by summarizing the current evidences.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis may help doctors determine the best treatments for patients to manage FC.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This is a protocol with no patient recruitment and personal information collection, approval by the ethics committee is not required.

OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER

DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/XTKE2.

摘要

背景

本综述旨在评估穴位埋线疗法治疗功能性便秘(FC)的有效性和安全性的现有证据,并为临床应用提供疗效评估。

方法

我们将检索以下数据库中的相关试验:PubMed、EMBASE OVID、护理学及相关健康学科累积索引、OVID MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Cochrane 图书馆和 Scopus。我们还将检索中国文献中的以下中文数据库中的试验:中国国家知识基础设施数据库(CNKI)、中国科学期刊数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库等,检索时间截至 2020 年 12 月。仅纳入比较穴位埋线与针灸或假针灸或安慰剂或其他疗法的随机对照试验。结局指标包括自发排便次数、完全自发排便次数、布里斯托大便形状量表、克利夫兰诊所评分、患者便秘症状评估等。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具和推荐评估、制定与评价指南对结局的偏倚风险评估和证据质量进行评价。使用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

本研究将通过总结现有证据,比较和整理穴位埋线与不同治疗方法治疗 FC 的比较疗效。

结论

荟萃分析的结果可能有助于医生确定治疗 FC 的最佳方法。

伦理和传播

本研究是一份方案,不涉及患者招募和个人信息收集,不需要伦理委员会的批准。

OSF 注册号:DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/XTKE2。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6063/7850654/89a3604b9229/medi-100-e24286-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验