• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭环境评估在儿童中期:支持社会、教育和公共卫生干预的工具。

Family Context Assessment in Middle Childhood: A Tool Supporting Social, Educational, and Public Health Interventions.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20018 San Sebastian, Spain.

Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Group of Environmental Epidemiology and Child Development, 20014 San Sebastian, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031094.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18031094
PMID:33530634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7908572/
Abstract

Quality of the family context has an important role in the physical and mental health of children; that is why it is important to have reliable and updated tools. This study aims to design and validate a new tool, the Haezi Etxadi Family Assessment Scale 7-11 (HEFAS 7-11), to assess family context quality in middle childhood. A sample of two cohorts of 772 Spanish families with children aged between 7 and 11 (M = 9.39 years; SD = 1.57; 51.2% girls), participated in the study. Results showed good psychometric properties for the instrument and the confirmatory factor analysis showed a five individual subscales structure: 1. Promotion of Cognitive and Linguistic Development (α = 0.79); 2. Promotion of Socio Emotional Development (α = 0.83); 3. Organization of Physical Environment and Social Context (α = 0.73); 4. Parental Stress & Conflict (α = 0.75); and 5. Parental Profile Fostering Child Development (α = 0.80). The association between HEFAS 7-11 and Trial Making Test was also analyzed to determine the concurrent validity of the instrument. The new scale shows its potential in the fields of research, social and educational, to know those variables that need to be promoted under the approach of positive parenting from a public health perspective.

摘要

家庭环境质量对儿童身心健康起着重要作用;这就是为什么拥有可靠和最新的工具很重要的原因。本研究旨在设计和验证一种新的工具,即 Haezi Etxadi 家庭评估量表 7-11(HEFAS 7-11),以评估儿童中期家庭环境质量。研究共纳入了两个年龄在 7 至 11 岁(M=9.39 岁;SD=1.57;51.2%为女孩)的西班牙儿童家庭样本,共 772 个家庭参与了研究。研究结果表明该工具具有良好的心理测量学特性,验证性因素分析显示该工具具有五个个体分量表结构:1. 促进认知和语言发展(α=0.79);2. 促进社会情感发展(α=0.83);3. 身体环境和社会环境的组织(α=0.73);4. 父母压力和冲突(α=0.75);5. 父母培养儿童发展的特征(α=0.80)。还分析了 HEFAS 7-11 与连线测验之间的关联,以确定该工具的同时效度。新量表显示了其在研究、社会和教育领域的潜力,从公共卫生的角度了解需要促进哪些积极养育的变量。

相似文献

1
Family Context Assessment in Middle Childhood: A Tool Supporting Social, Educational, and Public Health Interventions.家庭环境评估在儿童中期:支持社会、教育和公共卫生干预的工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 26;18(3):1094. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031094.
2
Socioeconomic position, family context, and child cognitive development.社会经济地位、家庭环境与儿童认知发展。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;183(6):2571-2585. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05482-x. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Poverty, social exclusion, and mental health: the role of the family context in children aged 7-11 years INMA mother-and-child cohort study.贫困、社会排斥与心理健康:家庭环境对 7-11 岁儿童的影响——一项 INMA 母婴队列研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;32(2):235-248. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01848-w. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
4
Family context assessment in a public health study.一项公共卫生研究中的家庭环境评估
Gac Sanit. 2014 Sep-Oct;28(5):356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
5
Development and validation of a parenting assessment tool for Chinese parents.中国父母育儿评估工具的开发与验证
Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Jul;38(4):588-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01263.x. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
6
The Mandarin Chinese version of the Beach Centre Family Quality of Life Scale: development and psychometric properties in Taiwanese families of children with developmental delay.海滩中心家庭生活质量量表中文版:台湾发育迟缓儿童家庭中的开发与心理测量特性
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Apr;61(4):373-384. doi: 10.1111/jir.12356. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
7
Validation of a measurement instrument for parental child feeding in a low and middle-income country.在中低收入国家验证一种用于父母养育子女的测量工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 20;15(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0736-7.
8
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 'Families for Health', a family-based childhood obesity treatment intervention delivered in a community setting for ages 6 to 11 years.一项随机对照试验,评估“健康家庭”项目的有效性和成本效益。该项目是一种针对6至11岁儿童的基于家庭的社区肥胖治疗干预措施。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(1):1-180. doi: 10.3310/hta21010.
9
Initial validation of the Spanish childhood trauma questionnaire-short form: factor structure, reliability and association with parenting.西班牙儿童创伤问卷-短式的初步验证:因子结构、信度和与养育方式的关系。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 May;28(7):1498-518. doi: 10.1177/0886260512468240. Epub 2012 Dec 24.
10
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Socioeconomic position, family context, and child cognitive development.社会经济地位、家庭环境与儿童认知发展。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jun;183(6):2571-2585. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05482-x. Epub 2024 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Relations Among Father's Presence, Family Conflict, and Adolescent Adjustment in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰地区父亲的存在、家庭冲突与青少年适应之间的关系。
Child Dev. 2021 May;92(3):904-918. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13446. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
The parenting 'vaccine'.育儿“疫苗”。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):985. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0932-8.
3
Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors and Their Association with Self-Regulation in Chilean Children.智利儿童的健康生活方式行为及其与自我调节的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165676.
4
The Impact of Attachment-Disrupting Adverse Childhood Experiences on Child Behavioral Health.依恋障碍型不良童年经历对儿童行为健康的影响。
J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;221:224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.006.
5
Maternal caregiving and DNA methylation in human infants and children: Systematic review.母婴照料与人类婴儿及儿童的 DNA 甲基化:系统综述。
Genes Brain Behav. 2020 Mar;19(3):e12616. doi: 10.1111/gbb.12616. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Screen Use During Meals Among Young Children: Exploration of Associated Variables.幼儿用餐时的屏幕使用情况:相关变量探究
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Oct 14;55(10):688. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100688.
7
Maternal emotional support but not cognitive support during problem-solving predicts increases in cognitive flexibility in early childhood.在解决问题过程中,母亲给予情感支持而非认知支持,能够预测幼儿期认知灵活性的提高。
Int J Behav Dev. 2019 Jan;43(1):12-23. doi: 10.1177/0165025418757706. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
8
The efficacy of different interventions to foster children's executive function skills: A series of meta-analyses.不同干预措施促进儿童执行功能技能的效果:一系列元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jul;145(7):653-697. doi: 10.1037/bul0000195. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Preschool father-child attachment and its relation to self-reported child socioemotional adaptation in middle childhood.幼儿期父子依恋及其与儿童中期自我报告的社会情绪适应的关系。
Attach Hum Dev. 2020 Feb;22(1):90-104. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2019.1589065. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
10
Adverse childhood experiences: Basics for the paediatrician.儿童期不良经历:儿科医生须知的基本知识。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Feb;24(1):30-37. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxy043. Epub 2018 Apr 5.