• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3 岁唇腭裂儿童使用语境可懂度评估量表的可懂度:来自腭裂队列研究的结果。

Intelligibility in 3-Year-Olds With Cleft Lip and/or Palate Using the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Findings from the Cleft Collective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Sep;58(9):1178-1189. doi: 10.1177/1055665620985747. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1177/1055665620985747
PMID:33530712
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To provide comparison data on the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS) for a sample of 3-year-old English-speaking children born with any cleft type.

DESIGN

Questionnaire data from the Cleft Collective Cohort Study were used. Descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out to determine difference according to children's cleft type and syndromic status.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 412 children born with cleft lip and/or palate whose mothers had completed the ICS when their child was 3 years old.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Mothers' rating of their children's intelligibility using the ICS.

RESULTS

The average ICS score for the total sample was 3.75 ( intelligible; standard deviation [SD] = 0.76, 95% CIs = 3.68-3.83) of a possible score of 5 ( intelligible). Children's speech was reported to be most intelligible to their mothers (mean = 4.33, SD = 0.61, 95% CIs = 4.27-4.39) and least intelligible to strangers (mean = 3.36, SD = 1.00, 95% CIs = 3.26-3.45). There was strong evidence ( < .001) for a difference in intelligibility between children with cleft lip only (n = 104, mean = 4.13, SD = 0.62, 95% CIs = 4.01-4.25) and children with any form of cleft palate (n = 308, mean = 3.63, SD = 0.76, 95% CIs = 3.52-3.71). Children born with cleft palate with or without cleft lip and an identified syndrome were rated as less intelligible (n = 63, mean = 3.28, SD = 0.85, 95% CIs = 3.06-3.49) compared to children who did not have a syndrome (n = 245, mean = 3.72, SD = 0.71, 95% CIs = 3.63-3.81).

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide preliminary comparative data for clinical services using the outcome measures recommended by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement.

摘要

目的

为一组患有各种类型腭裂的 3 岁英语母语儿童提供语境可懂度量表(ICS)的比较数据。

设计

使用来自腭裂队列研究的问卷数据。采用描述性和推论统计方法,根据儿童的腭裂类型和综合征状况确定差异。

参与者

共有 412 名患有唇裂和/或腭裂的儿童,其母亲在孩子 3 岁时完成了 ICS。

主要观察指标

母亲使用 ICS 对其子女清晰度的评价。

结果

总样本的平均 ICS 得分为 3.75(可理解;标准差[SD] = 0.76,95%置信区间[CI] = 3.68-3.83),得分为 5(可理解)。母亲报告说,孩子的语言对母亲来说最容易理解(平均值= 4.33,SD = 0.61,95%CI = 4.27-4.39),对陌生人来说最难理解(平均值= 3.36,SD = 1.00,95%CI = 3.26-3.45)。有充分证据(<0.001)表明,只有唇裂的儿童(n = 104,平均值= 4.13,SD = 0.62,95%CI = 4.01-4.25)和有任何形式腭裂的儿童(n = 308,平均值= 3.63,SD = 0.76,95%CI = 3.52-3.71)之间的可懂度存在差异。患有唇腭裂伴或不伴综合征的腭裂儿童(n = 63,平均值= 3.28,SD = 0.85,95%CI = 3.06-3.49)的清晰度评分低于没有综合征的儿童(n = 245,平均值= 3.72,SD = 0.71,95%CI = 3.63-3.81)。

结论

这些结果为使用国际健康结果测量联合会推荐的结果测量指标的临床服务提供了初步的比较数据。

相似文献

1
Intelligibility in 3-Year-Olds With Cleft Lip and/or Palate Using the Intelligibility in Context Scale: Findings from the Cleft Collective Cohort Study.3 岁唇腭裂儿童使用语境可懂度评估量表的可懂度:来自腭裂队列研究的结果。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021 Sep;58(9):1178-1189. doi: 10.1177/1055665620985747. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
Translation and validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale into Sinhala for adolescents in Sri Lanka with cleft lip and palate.斯里兰卡唇腭裂青少年使用情境可懂度评估量表的翻译和验证。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2023 Jun 3;37(4-6):398-414. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2022.2120417. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Exploring the relationship between cleft type and speech outcome in 4-to-6-year-olds with non-syndromic cleft palate using different measures: A preliminary report.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2025 Feb;39(2):198-213. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2024.2356035. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Relationship Between Intelligibility in Context Scale and Cleft-Related Speech Sound Errors in 3-Year-Olds With Nonsyndromic Cleft (Lip and) Palate.非综合征性唇腭裂三岁儿童的语境可懂度量表与腭裂相关语音错误之间的关系
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2025 Jul 8;68(7):3023-3036. doi: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00873. Epub 2025 May 23.
5
Reliability and validity of a computer-mediated, single-word intelligibility test: preliminary findings for children with repaired cleft lip and palate.计算机辅助单字清晰度测试的信度和效度:唇腭裂修复术后儿童的初步研究结果
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Sep;48(5):538-49. doi: 10.1597/09-166. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
6
Children's Attitudes Toward Peers With Unintelligible Speech Associated With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.儿童对伴有唇腭裂且语音不清的同伴的态度。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017 May;54(3):262-268. doi: 10.1597/15-088. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom--the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3: speech outcomes.英国唇腭裂护理——临床标准咨询小组(CSAG)研究。第3部分:语音结果。
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001 Jan;38(1):30-7. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_2001_038_0030_clapci_2.0.co_2.
8
Using "Real-World Data" to Study Cleft Lip/Palate Care: An Exploration of Speech Outcomes from a Multi-Center US Learning Health Network.利用“真实世界数据”研究唇腭裂护理:对美国一个多中心学习健康网络的语音结果的探索
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Mar;62(3):445-459. doi: 10.1177/10556656231207469. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
9
Orofacial Function, Articulation Proficiency, and Intelligibility in 5-Year-Old Children Born With Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患儿5岁时的口面部功能、发音熟练度及可懂度
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019 Mar;56(3):321-330. doi: 10.1177/1055665618783154. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Rasch Analysis of Patient- and Parent-Reported Outcome Measures in the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Standard Set for Cleft Lip and Palate.Rasch 分析在国际健康结果测量共识标准集用于唇腭裂的患者和家长报告结局测量中的应用。
Value Health. 2021 Mar;24(3):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Quantitative results of SonoSpeech Cleft Pilot: a mixed-methods pilot randomised control trial of ultrasound visual biofeedback versus standard intervention for children with cleft palate ± cleft lip.SonoSpeech腭裂试点研究的定量结果:一项关于超声视觉生物反馈与唇腭裂患儿标准干预措施对比的混合方法试点随机对照试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 May 6;11(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01640-6.
2
Intelligibility in Context Scale: Growth Curves for Typically Developing English-Speaking Children Between Ages 2;6 and 9;11.语境可懂度评估量表:2 岁半至 9 岁 11 个月的以英语为母语的正常发育儿童的生长曲线。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Sep 11;32(5):2021-2039. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00392. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
3
Early speech and language intervention in Brazilian-Portuguese toddlers with cleft lip and/or palate.
巴西葡萄牙语婴幼儿唇腭裂的早期言语和语言干预。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2022 Jan 2;36(1):34-53. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2021.1912187. Epub 2021 Apr 26.