Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗和根治性膀胱切除术后局部晚期膀胱癌患者的辅助化疗:一项系统评价和汇总分析

Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

作者信息

Cai Zhiyong, Jin Hang, Chen Jinbo, Hu Jiao, Li Huihuang, Yi Zhenglin, Zu Xiongbing

机构信息

Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Jan;10(1):283-291. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-571.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) could ameliorate the stage of locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) which is defined in pT3/T4 and/or pN+, improve overall survival (OS) before radical cystectomy (RC). However, for LABC, the decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after NAC and RC is still controversial.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for literature that reported prognosis after using AC following NAC and RC. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed. We performed all analyses by Review Manager software, version 5.3, and Stata 15.0.

RESULTS

Six retrospective cohort studies were included, involving 4,346 patients. Pooled analysis results showed that using AC after NAC and RC can improve OS (HR =0.83, 95% CI: 0.74-0.94, P=0.002; I =0%) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR =0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.99, P=0.04; I =0%) but cannot extend recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR =0.52, 95% CI: 0.27-1.01, P=0.05; I =53%) for LABC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis shows that AC after NAC and RC can improve the prognosis for patients with LABC.

摘要

背景

新辅助化疗(NAC)可改善局部晚期膀胱癌(LABC,定义为pT3/T4和/或pN+)的分期,提高根治性膀胱切除术(RC)前的总生存期(OS)。然而,对于LABC,在NAC和RC后使用辅助化疗(AC)的决策仍存在争议。

方法

我们全面检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以查找报告NAC和RC后使用AC的预后的文献。对风险比(HRs)和相应的95%置信区间(CIs)进行累积分析。我们使用Review Manager软件5.3版和Stata 15.0进行所有分析。

结果

纳入了6项回顾性队列研究,涉及4346例患者。汇总分析结果显示,NAC和RC后使用AC可改善LABC患者的OS(HR =0.83,95%CI:0.74-0.94,P=0.002;I²=0%)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)(HR =0.56,95%CI:0.32-0.99,P=0.04;I²=0%),但不能延长无复发生存期(RFS)(HR =0.52,95%CI:0.27-1.01,P=0.05;I²=53%)。

结论

这项汇总分析表明,NAC和RC后使用AC可改善LABC患者的预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1ae/7844510/781947a70b5e/tau-10-01-283-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验