Suppr超能文献

减少住院患者应激性溃疡预防中质子泵抑制剂的不适当使用:实施中止研究的系统评价。

Reducing Inappropriate Proton Pump Inhibitors Use for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients: Systematic Review of De-Implementation Studies.

机构信息

Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Research Support, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2065-2073. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06425-6. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A large proportion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) prescriptions, including those for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), are inappropriate. Our study purpose was to systematically review the effectiveness of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing inappropriate PPI use for SUP in hospitalized, non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases (from inception to January 2020). Two authors independently screened references, performed data extraction, and critical appraisal. Randomized trials and comparative observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Criteria developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group were used for critical appraisal. Besides the primary outcome (inappropriate PPI prescription or use), secondary outcomes included (adverse) pharmaceutical effects and healthcare use.

RESULTS

We included ten studies in this review. Most de-implementation strategies contained an educational component (meetings and/or materials), combined with either clinical guideline implementation (n = 5), audit feedback (n = 3), organizational culture (n = 4), or reminders (n = 1). One study evaluating the de-implementation strategy effectiveness showed a significant reduction (RR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-0.55) of new inappropriate PPI prescriptions. Out of five studies evaluating the effectiveness of de-implementing inappropriate PPI use, four found a significant reduction (RR 0.21; 95% CI 0.18-0.26 to RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.68-0.86). No significant differences in the occurrence of pharmaceutical effects (n = 1) and in length of stay (n = 3) were observed. Adverse pharmaceutical effects were reported in two studies and five studies reported on PPI or total drug costs. No pooled effect estimates were calculated because of large statistical heterogeneity between studies.

DISCUSSION

All identified studies reported mainly educational interventions in combination with one or multiple other intervention strategies and all interventions were targeted at providers. Most studies found a small to moderate reduction of (inappropriate) PPI prescriptions or use.

摘要

背景

很大比例的质子泵抑制剂(PPI)处方,包括应激性溃疡预防(SUP)的处方,都是不适当的。我们的研究目的是系统地回顾旨在减少住院非重症监护病房(非 ICU)患者中不适当 PPI 用于 SUP 的去执行策略的有效性。

方法

我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 Embase 数据库(从建库到 2020 年 1 月)。两位作者独立筛选参考文献、进行数据提取和批判性评价。纳入的研究包括随机试验和比较观察性研究。采用 Cochrane 有效实践和组织护理(EPOC)组制定的标准进行批判性评价。除了主要结局(不适当的 PPI 处方或使用)外,次要结局还包括(不良)药物作用和医疗保健使用。

结果

我们共纳入了 10 项研究。大多数去执行策略都包含教育组成部分(会议和/或材料),结合临床指南实施(n = 5)、审核反馈(n = 3)、组织文化(n = 4)或提醒(n = 1)。一项评估去执行策略效果的研究显示,新的不适当 PPI 处方显著减少(RR 0.14;95%CI 0.03-0.55)。在评估去执行不适当 PPI 使用效果的五项研究中,四项研究发现显著减少(RR 0.21;95%CI 0.18-0.26 至 RR 0.76;95%CI 0.68-0.86)。未观察到药物作用(n = 1)和住院时间(n = 3)的显著差异。两项研究报告了不良药物作用,五项研究报告了 PPI 或总药物费用。由于研究之间存在很大的统计学异质性,因此没有计算汇总效果估计值。

讨论

所有确定的研究都报告了主要的教育干预措施,结合了一种或多种其他干预策略,所有干预措施都针对提供者。大多数研究发现(不适当的)PPI 处方或使用量略有减少或中度减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/791b/8298652/8acdb8341f77/11606_2020_6425_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验