Department of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pharmacy Department-Evidence-Based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;45(10):1347-1359. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05751-6. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
To systematically identify predictors of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies including trial cohorts. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and trial registries up to March 2019. Eligible studies assessed potential predictors of clinically important GI bleeding (CIB; primary outcome) or overt GI bleeding (secondary outcome), had > 20 events, and presented adjusted effect estimates. Two reviewers assessed study eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence using GRADE. We meta-analysed adjusted effect estimates if data from ≥ 2 studies were available.
We included 8 studies (116,497 patients). 4 studies (including 74,456 patients) assessed potential predictors of CIB, and we meta-analysed 12 potential predictors from these. Acute kidney injury (relative effect [RE] 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-5.28, moderate certainty) and male gender (RE 1.24, 95% CI 1.03-1.50, low certainty) were associated with increased incidence of CIB. After excluding high risk of bias studies, coagulopathy (RE 4.76, 95% CI 2.62-8.63, moderate certainty), shock (RE 2.60, 95% CI 1.25-5.42, low certainty), and chronic liver disease (RE 7.64, 95% CI 3.32-17.58, moderate certainty) were associated with increased incidence of CIB. The effect of mechanical ventilation on CIB was unclear (RE 1.93, 0.57-6.50, very low certainty).
We identified predictors of CIB and overt GI bleeding in adult ICU patients. These findings may be used to identify ICU patients at higher risk of GI bleeding who are most likely to benefit from stress ulcer prophylaxis.
系统地确定成人重症监护病房(ICU)患者胃肠道(GI)出血的预测因素。
我们对包括试验队列的队列研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和试验注册处,检索截至 2019 年 3 月。合格的研究评估了临床重要的 GI 出血(CIB;主要结局)或显性 GI 出血(次要结局)的潜在预测因素,具有>20 例事件,并提出了调整后的效应估计值。两名审查员评估了研究的合格性,提取数据,并使用 GRADE 评估了偏倚风险和证据的确定性。如果有≥2 项研究提供了数据,则对调整后的效应估计值进行荟萃分析。
我们纳入了 8 项研究(116497 名患者)。4 项研究(包括 74456 名患者)评估了 CIB 的潜在预测因素,我们对这些研究中的 12 个潜在预测因素进行了荟萃分析。急性肾损伤(相对效应 [RE] 2.38,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.07-5.28,中等确定性)和男性性别(RE 1.24,95%CI 1.03-1.50,低确定性)与 CIB 发生率增加相关。在排除高偏倚风险的研究后,凝血功能障碍(RE 4.76,95%CI 2.62-8.63,中等确定性)、休克(RE 2.60,95%CI 1.25-5.42,低确定性)和慢性肝病(RE 7.64,95%CI 3.32-17.58,中等确定性)与 CIB 发生率增加相关。机械通气对 CIB 的影响尚不清楚(RE 1.93,0.57-6.50,极低确定性)。
我们确定了成人 ICU 患者 CIB 和显性 GI 出血的预测因素。这些发现可用于识别 GI 出血风险较高的 ICU 患者,这些患者最有可能从应激性溃疡预防中获益。