BCPS, BCIDP, Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy, Auburn, AL.
Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and Center for Value-based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12-a Suppl):S3-S23. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12-a.s3.
(, previously known as ) infections are a major health care concern. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that causes almost half a million illnesses in the United States yearly, and approximately 1 in 5 patients with a infection (CDI) will experience 1 or more recurrent infections. The incidence of infection has risen dramatically in recent years, and infection severity has increased due to the emergence of hypervirulent strains. There have been noteworthy advances in the development of CDI prevention and treatment, including a growth in the understanding of the role a patient's gut microbiome plays. The 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines made a significant change in treatment recommendations for first time CDI episodes by recommending the use of oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin in place of metronidazole as a first-line treatment. The guidelines also included detailed recommendations on the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in those patients who experience 3 or more recurrent CDI episodes. A number of novel therapies for the treatment of CDI are in various stages of development. Treatments currently in phase 3 trials include the antibiotic ridinilazole, the microbiome products SER-109 and RBX2660, and a vaccine. All of these agents have shown promise in phase 1 and 2 trials. Additionally, several other antibiotic and microbiome candidates are currently in phase 1 or phase 2 trials. A qualitative review and evaluation of the literature on the cost-effectiveness of treatments for CDI in the U.S. setting was conducted, and the summary provided herein. Due to the higher cost of newer agents, cost-effectiveness evaluations will continue to be critical in clinical decision making for CDI. This paper reviews the updated CDI guidelines for prevention and treatment, the role of the microbiome in new and recurrent infections, pipeline medications, and comparative effectiveness research (CER) data on these treatments. : Durham and Le have nothing to disclose. Cassano reports consulting fees from Baxter Healthcare. Peer reviewers Drs. Ami Gopalan and Mark Rubin and Ms. Kathleen Jarvis have nothing to disclose. Planners Dr. Christine L. Cooper and Ms. Susan Yarbrough have nothing to disclose.
艰难梭菌(,以前称为)感染是一个主要的医疗保健关注点。疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)估计,每年在美国导致近 50 万人患病,并且大约每 5 名艰难梭菌感染(CDI)患者中就有 1 名或更多名患者会经历 1 次或多次复发感染。近年来,感染的发病率急剧上升,由于高毒力株的出现,感染的严重程度也有所增加。在 CDI 的预防和治疗方面已经取得了显著进展,包括对患者肠道微生物组所起作用的认识不断提高。2017 年传染病学会(IDSA)指南在首次 CDI 发作的治疗建议方面做出了重大改变,建议使用口服万古霉素或非达霉素代替甲硝唑作为一线治疗。该指南还包括了在经历 3 次或更多次复发性 CDI 发作的患者中使用粪便微生物群移植(FMT)的详细建议。许多用于治疗 CDI 的新型疗法正在处于不同的开发阶段。目前正在进行 3 期临床试验的治疗方法包括抗生素利迪尼唑、微生物组产品 SER-109 和 RBX2660,以及一种疫苗。所有这些药物在 1 期和 2 期试验中都显示出了希望。此外,还有其他几种抗生素和微生物组候选药物目前正在 1 期或 2 期临床试验中。对美国艰难梭菌治疗成本效益的文献进行了定性回顾和评估,并提供了本文概述。由于新型药物的成本较高,成本效益评估将继续在艰难梭菌的临床决策中至关重要。本文综述了更新的 CDI 预防和治疗指南、微生物组在新发和复发性感染中的作用、药物研发管道,以及这些治疗方法的比较有效性研究(CER)数据。