SleepWell Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 3;9(2):e24704. doi: 10.2196/24704.
Polysomnography (PSG) is considered the only reliable way to distinguish between different sleep stages. Wearable devices provide objective markers of sleep; however, these devices often rely only on accelerometer data, which do not enable reliable sleep stage detection. The alteration between sleep stages correlates with changes in physiological measures such as heart rate variability (HRV). Utilizing HRV measures may thus increase accuracy in wearable algorithms.
We examined the validity of the Firstbeat sleep analysis method, which is based on HRV and accelerometer measurements. The Firstbeat method was compared against PSG in a sample of healthy adults. Our aim was to evaluate how well Firstbeat distinguishes sleep stages, and which stages are most accurately detected with this method.
Twenty healthy adults (mean age 24.5 years, SD 3.5, range 20-37 years; 50% women) wore a Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 measurement device and a Geneactiv actigraph, along with taking ambulatory SomnoMedics PSG measurements for two consecutive nights, resulting in 40 nights of sleep comparisons. We compared the measures of sleep onset, wake, combined stage 1 and stage 2 (light sleep), stage 3 (slow wave sleep), and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep between Firstbeat and PSG. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy from the 30-second epoch-by-epoch data.
In detecting wake, Firstbeat yielded good specificity (0.77), and excellent sensitivity (0.95) and accuracy (0.93) against PSG. Light sleep was detected with 0.69 specificity, 0.67 sensitivity, and 0.69 accuracy. Slow wave sleep was detected with 0.91 specificity, 0.72 sensitivity, and 0.87 accuracy. REM sleep was detected with 0.92 specificity, 0.60 sensitivity, and 0.84 accuracy. There were two measures that differed significantly between Firstbeat and PSG: Firstbeat underestimated REM sleep (mean 18 minutes, P=.03) and overestimated wake time (mean 14 minutes, P<.001).
This study supports utilizing HRV alongside an accelerometer as a means for distinguishing sleep from wake and for identifying sleep stages. The Firstbeat method was able to detect light sleep and slow wave sleep with no statistically significant difference to PSG. Firstbeat underestimated REM sleep and overestimated wake time. This study suggests that Firstbeat is a feasible method with sufficient validity to measure nocturnal sleep stage variation.
多导睡眠图(PSG)被认为是区分不同睡眠阶段的唯一可靠方法。可穿戴设备提供了睡眠的客观标记;然而,这些设备通常仅依赖于加速度计数据,这使得可靠的睡眠阶段检测变得不可能。睡眠阶段的转换与心率变异性(HRV)等生理测量值的变化相关。因此,利用 HRV 测量值可以提高可穿戴算法的准确性。
我们检验了 Firstbeat 睡眠分析方法的有效性,该方法基于 HRV 和加速度计测量值。Firstbeat 方法与健康成年人的 PSG 进行了比较。我们的目的是评估 Firstbeat 区分睡眠阶段的能力,以及该方法最能准确检测到哪些阶段。
20 名健康成年人(平均年龄 24.5 岁,标准差 3.5,范围 20-37 岁;50%为女性)连续两晚佩戴 Firstbeat Bodyguard 2 测量设备和 Geneactiv 活动记录仪,同时进行 SomnoMedics 动态睡眠描记术(PSG)测量,共进行了 40 晚的睡眠比较。我们比较了 Firstbeat 和 PSG 的睡眠起始、觉醒、合并的 1 期和 2 期(浅睡眠)、3 期(慢波睡眠)和快速眼动(REM)睡眠的测量值。我们根据 30 秒的逐epoch 数据计算了敏感性、特异性和准确性。
在检测觉醒时,Firstbeat 对 PSG 的特异性(0.77)良好,敏感性(0.95)和准确性(0.93)很高。浅睡眠的特异性为 0.69,敏感性为 0.67,准确性为 0.69。慢波睡眠的特异性为 0.91,敏感性为 0.72,准确性为 0.87。REM 睡眠的特异性为 0.92,敏感性为 0.60,准确性为 0.84。Firstbeat 和 PSG 之间有两个差异显著的测量值:Firstbeat 低估了 REM 睡眠(平均 18 分钟,P=.03),高估了觉醒时间(平均 14 分钟,P<.001)。
本研究支持将 HRV 与加速度计结合使用,作为区分睡眠和觉醒以及识别睡眠阶段的手段。Firstbeat 方法能够检测到浅睡眠和慢波睡眠,与 PSG 相比没有统计学上的显著差异。Firstbeat 低估了 REM 睡眠,高估了觉醒时间。本研究表明,Firstbeat 是一种具有足够有效性的可行方法,可用于测量夜间睡眠阶段的变化。