Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue 27-139 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1740, USA.
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue 27-139 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1740, USA.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Apr;38(4):865-871. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02069-5. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
To report the rate of fetal anomalies detected on anatomy ultrasound in pregnant patients who underwent IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) compared to patients who conceived following IVF with unscreened embryos and age-matched patients with natural conceptions.
Retrospective cohort study at a single maternal-fetal medicine practice. Patients with singleton pregnancies who had a mid-trimester anatomy ultrasound between January 2017 and December 2018 were screened for inclusion. A total of 712 patients who conceived after IVF with or without PGT-A were age-matched with natural conception controls. The primary outcome was the rate of fetal and placental anomalies detected on mid-trimester anatomical survey. Secondary outcomes included the rates of abnormal nuchal translucency (NT), second trimester serum analytes, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), and invasive diagnostic testing.
RESULT(S): There were no differences in the rate of fetal anomalies in patients who underwent IVF with PGT-A compared to patients who conceived following IVF with unscreened embryos and age-matched patients with natural conceptions. Rate of abnormal NT, high-risk NIPT, and abnormal invasive diagnostic testing were also similar. Patients who conceived after IVF with or without PGT-A had higher rates of abnormal placental ultrasound findings and abnormal second trimester serum analytes compared to natural conception controls.
The use of PGT-A was not associated with a difference in risk of fetal anomaly detection on a mid-trimester anatomical survey. The results of this study highlight the importance of improved patient counseling regarding the limitations of PGT-A, and of providing standard prenatal care for pregnancies conceived through ART, regardless of whether PGT-A was performed.
报告在接受胚胎植入前遗传学检测非整倍体(PGT-A)的体外受精(IVF)后妊娠患者与接受未经筛选胚胎的 IVF 后妊娠患者和年龄匹配的自然受孕患者相比,中孕期超声检查发现胎儿异常的发生率。
这是在一家母胎医学实践中心进行的回顾性队列研究。筛选了 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间进行中孕期超声检查的单胎妊娠患者。共纳入了 712 名接受过 PGT-A 或未经 PGT-A 的 IVF 受孕的患者,并与自然受孕对照组进行年龄匹配。主要结局是中孕期解剖学调查中发现的胎儿和胎盘异常的发生率。次要结局包括异常颈项透明层(NT)、中期血清分析物、非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)和侵入性诊断性检测的发生率。
与接受未经筛选胚胎的 IVF 受孕患者和年龄匹配的自然受孕患者相比,接受 PGT-A 的 IVF 受孕患者的胎儿异常发生率没有差异。异常 NT、高危 NIPT 和异常侵入性诊断性检测的发生率也相似。与自然受孕对照组相比,接受过 PGT-A 或未经 PGT-A 的 IVF 受孕的患者的异常胎盘超声检查结果和异常中期血清分析物的发生率更高。
PGT-A 的使用与中孕期解剖学检查中胎儿异常检测风险的差异无关。这项研究的结果强调了需要改进对患者的咨询,告知他们 PGT-A 的局限性,并为通过 ART 受孕的妊娠提供标准的产前护理,无论是否进行了 PGT-A。