From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Shanghai Children's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200062, China (CZ, SZ, JD, RW).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Oct 1;38(10):1026-1033. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001451.
Atelectasis is a common postoperative complication. Peri-operative lung protection can reduce atelectasis; however, it is not clear whether this persists into the postoperative period.
To evaluate to what extent lung-protective ventilation reduces peri-operative atelectasis in children undergoing nonabdominal surgery.
Randomised, controlled, double-blind study.
Single tertiary hospital, 25 July 2019 to 18 January 2020.
A total of 60 patients aged 1 to 6 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2, planned for nonabdominal surgery under general anaesthesia (≤2 h) with mechanical ventilation.
The patients were assigned randomly into either the lung-protective or zero end-expiratory pressure with no recruitment manoeuvres (control) group. Lung protection entailed 5 cmH2O positive end-expiratory pressure and recruitment manoeuvres every 30 min. Both groups received volume-controlled ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml kg-1 body weight. Lung ultrasound was conducted before anaesthesia induction, immediately after induction, surgery and tracheal extubation, and 15 min, 3 h, 12 h and 24 h after extubation.
The difference in lung ultrasound score between groups at each interval. A higher score indicates worse lung aeration.
Patients in the lung-protective group exhibited lower median [IQR] ultrasound scores compared with the control group immediately after surgery, 4 [4 to 5] vs. 8 [4 to 6], (95% confidence interval for the difference between group values -4 to -4, Z = -6.324) and after extubation 3 [3 to 4] vs. 4 [4 to 4], 95% CI -1 to 0, Z = -3.161. This did not persist from 15 min after extubation onwards. Lung aeration returned to normal in both groups 3 h after extubation.
The reduced atelectasis provided by lung-protective ventilation does not persist from 15 min after extubation onwards. Further studies are needed to determine if it yields better results in other types of surgery.
Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000033469).
肺不张是一种常见的术后并发症。围手术期肺保护可减少肺不张;然而,其是否能持续到术后尚不清楚。
评估肺保护性通气在非腹部手术患儿中减少围手术期肺不张的程度。
随机、对照、双盲研究。
单中心三级医院,2019 年 7 月 25 日至 2020 年 1 月 18 日。
共纳入 60 例年龄 1 至 6 岁、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况 1 或 2 级、计划在全身麻醉下(≤2 h)行非腹部手术且需机械通气的患儿。
患儿随机分为肺保护性通气组或零呼气末正压(无复张手法)对照组。肺保护性通气采用 5 cmH2O 呼气末正压和每 30 min 进行复张手法。两组均采用容量控制通气,潮气量 6 ml/kg 体重。麻醉诱导前、诱导后、手术中、气管拔管时以及拔管后 15 min、3 h、12 h 和 24 h 行肺部超声检查。
两组在各时间点的肺部超声评分差异。评分越高,肺通气越差。
与对照组相比,肺保护性通气组患儿术后即刻、拔管即刻和拔管后 3 肺部超声评分较低,分别为 4 [4 至 5] 分比 8 [4 至 6] 分,(组间差值的 95%置信区间为-4 至-4,Z=-6.324)和 4 [3 至 4] 分比 8 [4 至 4] 分,95%CI-1 至 0,Z=-3.161。从拔管后 15 min 开始,这一差异不再存在。两组患儿在拔管后 3 h 时肺通气均恢复正常。
肺保护性通气减少的肺不张在拔管后 15 min 后不再持续。需要进一步研究以确定其在其他类型手术中是否能获得更好的结果。
Chictr.org.cn(ChiCTR2000033469)。