Suppr超能文献

超声引导与常规肺复张手法在胸外科手术中的比较:一项随机对照研究。

Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in thoracic surgery: a randomised controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.

Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, No. 270, Dong'An Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.

出版信息

J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Jun;38(3):731-739. doi: 10.1007/s10877-024-01134-5. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

Abstract

Lung recruitment manoeuvres (RMs) during mechanical ventilation may reduce atelectasis, however, the optimal recruitment strategy for patients undergoing thoracic surgery remains unknown. Our study was designed to investigate whether ultrasound-guided lung RMs is superior to conventional RMs in reducing perioperative atelectasis during thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation. We conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial from August 2022 to September 2022. Sixty patients scheduled for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) under general anaesthesia were enrolled. Subjects were randomly divided into the ultrasound-guided RMs group (manual inflation guided by lung ultrasound) or conventional RMs group (manual inflation with 30 cmHO pressure). Lung ultrasound were performed at three predefined time points (1 min after anaesthetic induction; after RMs at the end of surgery; before discharge from postanesthesia care unit [PACU]). The primary outcome was lung ultrasound score before discharge from the PACU after extubation. In the early postoperative period, lung aeration deteriorated in both groups even after lung RMs. However, ultrasound-guided lung RMs had significantly lower lung ultrasound scores when compared with conventional RMs in bilateral lungs (2.0 [0.8-4.0] vs. 8.0 [3.8-10.3], P < 0.01) at the end of surgery, which remained before patients discharged from the PACU. Accordingly, the lower incidence of atelectasis was found in ultrasound-guided RMs group than in conventional RMs group (7% vs. 53%; P < 0.01) at the end of surgery. Ultrasound-guided RMs is superior to conventional RMs in improving lung aeration and reducing the incidence of lung atelectasis at early postoperative period in patients undergoing VATS. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (No. 220,825,810; date of approval: August 5, 2022) and registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2200062761).

摘要

肺复张手法(RMs)在机械通气中可减少肺不张,然而,在单肺通气下接受开胸手术的患者最佳的复张策略仍不清楚。我们的研究旨在探讨超声引导下的肺 RMs 是否优于传统 RMs,以减少开胸手术中单肺通气期间围手术期的肺不张。我们于 2022 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月进行了一项随机对照临床试验。共纳入 60 例全身麻醉下行电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的患者。受试者随机分为超声引导 RMs 组(肺超声引导的手动充气)或传统 RMs 组(30cmH2O 压力下的手动充气)。在三个预设时间点(麻醉诱导后 1 分钟;手术结束时 RMs 后;离开麻醉后监护室[PACU]前)进行肺超声检查。主要结局为拔管后离开 PACU 前的肺超声评分。在术后早期,两组的肺充气均恶化,即使在肺 RMs 后也是如此。然而,与传统 RMs 相比,超声引导的肺 RMs 在手术结束时双侧肺的肺超声评分显著更低(2.0[0.8-4.0] vs. 8.0[3.8-10.3],P<0.01),在患者离开 PACU 前仍如此。因此,在手术结束时,超声引导的 RMs 组比传统 RMs 组的肺不张发生率更低(7% vs. 53%;P<0.01)。在 VATS 患者中,超声引导的 RMs 组在改善术后早期肺充气和降低肺不张发生率方面优于传统 RMs 组。该研究方案得到了复旦大学附属肿瘤医院机构审查委员会的批准(No. 220,825,810;批准日期:2022 年 8 月 5 日),并在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2200062761)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验