Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.
NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation (Sun Yat-sen University).
J Hypertens. 2021 Jul 1;39(7):1378-1385. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002807.
To determine the associations of long-term SBP (LT-SBP) levels with clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
We analyzed participants from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) study with available different SBP measurements from different follow-ups (n = 3310). LT-SBP was the mean SBP value from 4-week measurement to the last one. The outcome measures are all-cause mortality and a composite of heart failure readmission or all-cause mortality and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) overall summary score. To determine the associations of LT-SBP and outcomes, we used adjusted Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline models. After multivariable adjustment, LT-SBP of 120-129 and 130-139 mmHg were associated with a lower risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87, P = 0.003; hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90, P = 0.007, respectively); LT-SBP of 100-119 mmHg had similar risk of mortality (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.28, P = 0.778) compared with LT-SBP of at least 140 mmHg. There was U-shaped relationship between LT-SBP and all-cause mortality (P < 0.001) with nadir risk occurring around 123 mmHg. Similar relationships were observed between LT-SBP and composite end point of heart failure readmission or all-cause mortality. The adjusted mean improvement in KCCQ score was significantly higher in the 120-129 mmHg group than in the at least 140 mmHg group beginning from the 12-month follow-up visit without significant differences in other groups.
Among patients with HFpEF, long-term control of SBP level at 120-129 mmHg is independently associated with the highest risk reduction of all-cause mortality and improvement of KCCQ score. Future randomized clinical trials need to specifically evaluate optimal SBP treatment goals in patients with HFpEF.
确定长期收缩压(LT-SBP)水平与射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者临床结局和健康相关生活质量的关系。
我们分析了来自治疗保留心脏功能心力衰竭的醛固酮拮抗剂(TOPCAT)研究的参与者,这些参与者有来自不同随访的不同 SBP 测量值(n=3310)。LT-SBP 是从 4 周测量到最后一次测量的平均 SBP 值。结局测量指标是全因死亡率和心力衰竭再入院或全因死亡率和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)总综合评分的复合终点。为了确定 LT-SBP 与结局的关系,我们使用了调整后的 Cox 比例风险模型和限制立方样条模型。经过多变量调整后,120-129mmHg 和 130-139mmHg 的 LT-SBP 与较低的死亡率风险相关(风险比 0.66,95%置信区间 0.51-0.87,P=0.003;风险比 0.68,95%置信区间 0.51-0.90,P=0.007,分别);100-119mmHg 的 LT-SBP 与至少 140mmHg 的 LT-SBP 相比,死亡率风险相似(风险比 0.96,95%置信区间 0.72-1.28,P=0.778)。LT-SBP 与全因死亡率之间呈 U 形关系(P<0.001),最低风险出现在 123mmHg 左右。在心力衰竭再入院或全因死亡率的复合终点方面,也观察到 LT-SBP 与结局之间存在类似的关系。从 12 个月随访开始,120-129mmHg 组的 KCCQ 评分调整后平均改善显著高于至少 140mmHg 组,而其他组之间没有显著差异。
在 HFpEF 患者中,将 SBP 水平长期控制在 120-129mmHg 与全因死亡率降低和 KCCQ 评分改善的风险最高降低独立相关。未来的随机临床试验需要专门评估 HFpEF 患者的最佳 SBP 治疗目标。